Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chew on this Hawk Lovers!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hawk played a very physical game on Sunday. He looked like he really wanted to play. let's all hope he continues this for the rest of the season, great job AJ.
    Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Brandon494
      Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.

      That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
      "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ND72
        Originally posted by Brandon494
        Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.

        That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
        Like the troll will still be here.
        "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ND72
          Originally posted by Brandon494
          Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.

          That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
          You need to get over your hard on for AJ Hawk.

          Hawk wants to return to Packers next season
          Regardless of his current role, linebacker A.J. Hawk says he would like to remain with the Packers beyond this season.

          That decision, though, almost surely will come down to whether he’s willing to take a major pay cut from the $4.1 million he’s scheduled to make in base salary next year.

          Hawk, who has played only in the Packers’ base defense the last two games, was on the field for only nine snaps against the Detroit Lions last week because defensive coordiator Dom Capers deployed nickel personnel most of the game.

          It’s a given the Packers won’t bring back Hawk next year at that pay. They presumably would ask him to take a pay cut before releasing him, and if they do, it will be up to Hawk to accept their new offer or force them to cut him so he can sign with another club.

          “I don’t know, if that happens we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it,” Hawk said of a pay cut. “I like it here. Definitely. Regardless of how many reps I’m getting right now I still want to be here. I’d much rather be not playing as much as I’d like on a good winning team and a solid organization than starting for a team going 2-14.”

          -- Pete Dougherty, pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com

          Comment


          • What is posting that article supposed to prove?
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              What is posting that article supposed to prove?
              That insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                What is posting that article supposed to prove?
                Every article you read in the paper comes true about 2010 written in Oct 2009. What else could it prove?
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SkinBasket
                  Originally posted by ND72
                  Originally posted by Brandon494
                  Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.

                  That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
                  Like the troll will still be here.
                  I'm a troll now? I've been a member of his board since 2006 dick face, just don't post as much.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    What is posting that article supposed to prove?
                    That insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.
                    Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.

                    Comment


                    • pb-

                      I did some more digging.

                      In 2006, Hawk was the 6th leading OLB tackler behind Bulluck, June, Briggs, Sims and Brooks.

                      In 2007, Hawk was the 9th leading OLB tackler.

                      Hard to compare 2008 with him playing both OLB and MLB.
                      But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                      -Tim Harmston

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Brandon494
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        What is posting that article supposed to prove?
                        That insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.
                        Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.
                        How about those August columns saying the Packers were SuperBowl bound?
                        But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                        -Tim Harmston

                        Comment


                        • Hawk will have to take a pay cut from $4.1 million when we will be either millions of dollars under the salary cap, or will have an uncapped year??? He got a $13 million dollar roster bonus in March of 2008, pretty sure $4.1 million is nothing, especially since Ted loves him, Moss loves him, and McCarthy love him.

                          My "hard on" for Hawk has nothing to do with common sense.
                          "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ND72
                            Hawk will have to take a pay cut from $4.1 million when we will be either millions of dollars under the salary cap, or will have an uncapped year??? He got a $13 million dollar roster bonus in March of 2008, pretty sure $4.1 million is nothing, especially since Ted loves him, Moss loves him, and McCarthy love him.

                            My "hard on" for Hawk has nothing to do with common sense.
                            I don't think they love him as much as you think. I've never heard MM say anything glowing about him this year. In fact I've only heard things with a negative connotation like (paraphrase) "We'd like him to let loose and play more aggressively", etc.

                            Moss basically said the same thing the other day in the JSO article.

                            I don't think they're as high on him as you think.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by ND72
                              My "hard on" for Hawk has nothing to do with common sense.
                              So you admit it?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ThunderDan
                                Originally posted by Brandon494
                                Originally posted by Partial
                                Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                                What is posting that article supposed to prove?
                                That insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.
                                Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.
                                How about those August columns saying the Packers were SuperBowl bound?
                                Serioulsy dude, your posts are horrible. Just like most of you posts what does that have to do with anything?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X