Hawk played a very physical game on Sunday. He looked like he really wanted to play. let's all hope he continues this for the rest of the season, great job AJ.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chew on this Hawk Lovers!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Brandon494Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.
That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself."I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh
Comment
-
Like the troll will still be here.Originally posted by ND72Originally posted by Brandon494Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.
That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
You need to get over your hard on for AJ Hawk.Originally posted by ND72Originally posted by Brandon494Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.
That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
Hawk wants to return to Packers next season
Regardless of his current role, linebacker A.J. Hawk says he would like to remain with the Packers beyond this season.
That decision, though, almost surely will come down to whether he’s willing to take a major pay cut from the $4.1 million he’s scheduled to make in base salary next year.
Hawk, who has played only in the Packers’ base defense the last two games, was on the field for only nine snaps against the Detroit Lions last week because defensive coordiator Dom Capers deployed nickel personnel most of the game.
It’s a given the Packers won’t bring back Hawk next year at that pay. They presumably would ask him to take a pay cut before releasing him, and if they do, it will be up to Hawk to accept their new offer or force them to cut him so he can sign with another club.
“I don’t know, if that happens we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it,” Hawk said of a pay cut. “I like it here. Definitely. Regardless of how many reps I’m getting right now I still want to be here. I’d much rather be not playing as much as I’d like on a good winning team and a solid organization than starting for a team going 2-14.”
-- Pete Dougherty, pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com
Comment
-
That insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat is posting that article supposed to prove?
Comment
-
Every article you read in the paper comes true about 2010 written in Oct 2009. What else could it prove?Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat is posting that article supposed to prove?But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
I'm a troll now? I've been a member of his board since 2006 dick face, just don't post as much.Originally posted by SkinBasketLike the troll will still be here.Originally posted by ND72Originally posted by Brandon494Anyway I'm done with this topic, Hawk has been a disappointment for where he was drafted and there is nothing you can say to me to prove otherwise. Unless he suddenly starts to break out in the new 3-4 scheme you won't be seeing him in GB next season unless he takes a paycut.
That's pretty laughable...Can't wait until next season when Hawk is still inthe starting lineup in Green Bay so I can reference back and let you "chew" on that yourself.
Comment
-
Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.Originally posted by PartialThat insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat is posting that article supposed to prove?
Comment
-
pb-
I did some more digging.
In 2006, Hawk was the 6th leading OLB tackler behind Bulluck, June, Briggs, Sims and Brooks.
In 2007, Hawk was the 9th leading OLB tackler.
Hard to compare 2008 with him playing both OLB and MLB.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
How about those August columns saying the Packers were SuperBowl bound?Originally posted by Brandon494Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.Originally posted by PartialThat insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat is posting that article supposed to prove?But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
Hawk will have to take a pay cut from $4.1 million when we will be either millions of dollars under the salary cap, or will have an uncapped year??? He got a $13 million dollar roster bonus in March of 2008, pretty sure $4.1 million is nothing, especially since Ted loves him, Moss loves him, and McCarthy love him.
My "hard on" for Hawk has nothing to do with common sense."I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh
Comment
-
I don't think they love him as much as you think. I've never heard MM say anything glowing about him this year. In fact I've only heard things with a negative connotation like (paraphrase) "We'd like him to let loose and play more aggressively", etc.Originally posted by ND72Hawk will have to take a pay cut from $4.1 million when we will be either millions of dollars under the salary cap, or will have an uncapped year??? He got a $13 million dollar roster bonus in March of 2008, pretty sure $4.1 million is nothing, especially since Ted loves him, Moss loves him, and McCarthy love him.
My "hard on" for Hawk has nothing to do with common sense.
Moss basically said the same thing the other day in the JSO article.
I don't think they're as high on him as you think.
Comment
-
Serioulsy dude, your posts are horrible. Just like most of you posts what does that have to do with anything?Originally posted by ThunderDanHow about those August columns saying the Packers were SuperBowl bound?Originally posted by Brandon494Thank you, its not that hard to figure out.Originally posted by PartialThat insiders believe that Hawk is going to have to take a paycut to remain on the Packers. I agree with them if he plays like he typically has the past two years. If he continues like he did yesterday he will be a Packer for awhile.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersWhat is posting that article supposed to prove?

Comment


Comment