Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What if this team goes 10-6?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by mraynrand
    Originally posted by The Leaper
    What if I wake up and Jenna Jamison is sitting on my cock?

    Both have about the same chance of happening at this point.
    Jenna is knocking at the door!
    Check yourself for std's afterwards

    Comment


    • In his dreams....

      10-6 could easily be reality...like others have said, if it doesn't, this whole place will explode...
      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Airin' Rodgers
        Originally posted by mraynrand
        Originally posted by The Leaper
        What if I wake up and Jenna Jamison is sitting on my cock?

        Both have about the same chance of happening at this point.
        Jenna is knocking at the door!
        Check yourself for std's afterwards
        Leaper is the one who has to worry! Probably after that Seattle game, but maybe next week.
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • Originally posted by mraynrand
          Originally posted by Airin' Rodgers
          Originally posted by mraynrand
          Originally posted by The Leaper
          What if I wake up and Jenna Jamison is sitting on my cock?

          Both have about the same chance of happening at this point.
          Jenna is knocking at the door!
          Check yourself for std's afterwards
          Leaper is the one who has to worry! Probably after that Seattle game, but maybe next week.
          I know i was directing my comment at him! maybe next week??? This team is going 12-4

          Comment


          • The defense is stepping up beyond what I thought they could achieve... due to the fact that Capers is actually running a multi-front, unbalanced attack which is what makes the 3-4 effective.

            My main concern about Capers was conservativism... and we saw an awful lot of that earlier in the season - but, as someone on this board pointed out, Capers did make a comment about the conservative nature of his game plans and play calling being due to the players not being fully up to speed and comfortable with the scheme. I did not see where Capers had said that, but I accept it as being valid.

            Matthews has made a believer out of me, Raji is getting better every week... and the multi-front looks Capers is showing is creating confusion for the opponents offense.

            Don't know how far we can go... but we're making more progress than I could have hoped for.
            wist

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wist43
              The defense is stepping up beyond what I thought they could achieve... due to the fact that Capers is actually running a multi-front, unbalanced attack which is what makes the 3-4 effective.

              My main concern about Capers was conservativism... and we saw an awful lot of that earlier in the season - but, as someone on this board pointed out, Capers did make a comment about the conservative nature of his game plans and play calling being due to the players not being fully up to speed and comfortable with the scheme. I did not see where Capers had said that, but I accept it as being valid.

              Matthews has made a believer out of me, Raji is getting better every week... and the multi-front looks Capers is showing is creating confusion for the opponents offense.

              Don't know how far we can go... but we're making more progress than I could have hoped for.

              Alright - who hacked into Wist's account?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                Originally posted by wist43
                The defense is stepping up beyond what I thought they could achieve... due to the fact that Capers is actually running a multi-front, unbalanced attack which is what makes the 3-4 effective.

                My main concern about Capers was conservativism... and we saw an awful lot of that earlier in the season - but, as someone on this board pointed out, Capers did make a comment about the conservative nature of his game plans and play calling being due to the players not being fully up to speed and comfortable with the scheme. I did not see where Capers had said that, but I accept it as being valid.

                Matthews has made a believer out of me, Raji is getting better every week... and the multi-front looks Capers is showing is creating confusion for the opponents offense.

                Don't know how far we can go... but we're making more progress than I could have hoped for.

                Alright - who hacked into Wist's account?
                I was going to say the same thing after I read his post.
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Bossman641
                  Originally posted by ThunderDan
                  Well... 5 in a row and 9-4. 1 more win to get 10 with 3 to go.
                  I still think 5-11 is more likely than 10-6.
                  What do you think now? :P
                  --
                  Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                  Comment


                  • 5 down, 3 to go. The Pack are 9-4. Five in a row is a good thing, especially on the road.

                    Illegal Formation - declined
                    False Start (Tausch) - 5 yards
                    False Start (Lee) - 5 yards
                    Facemask (Jolly) - 15 yards
                    False Start (Bush) - 5 yards
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Guiness
                      Originally posted by Bossman641
                      Originally posted by ThunderDan
                      Well... 5 in a row and 9-4. 1 more win to get 10 with 3 to go.
                      I still think 5-11 is more likely than 10-6.
                      What do you think now? :P
                      I believe Bossman was echoing Partial's page three comment about it being much more likely that the Pack would go 5 - 11 than 10 - 6.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • I'm keeping a wide array of STD-fighting defenses handy these days.

                        That said, our offense continues to buck and clank more often than an early vintage Model T. Pittsburgh is a cornered, wounded animal...and if Arizona has anything to play for, I don't like our chances.

                        However, Seattle coming to GB in December should be a W.

                        Next year, I'll try to remember to pull out a Tiger Woods caliber reference when critiquing the Packers chances.
                        My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                        Comment


                        • If this team goes 10-6 it means losing 2 of 3.

                          Have more confidence than that.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                            If this team goes 10-6 it means losing 2 of 3.

                            Have more confidence than that.
                            I'll drink to that

                            Comment


                            • We have Pittsburgh, Seattle, and Arizona left. Going 3-0 is not out of the question and if we want to be considered a serious contender, we will have to take care of two mediocre teams and one division winner. Pittsburgh is in a tailspin right now. Seattle isn't very good, and Arizona can hang with anyone.

                              However, we have some big issues to worry about. First of all, consistency in the secondary by anyone named Williams and Bush. Secondly, Rodgers has thrown some really bad balls the past two weeks and he has taken some pretty hard hits. The play calling was once again, horrible. With how much we ran the ball against Chicago, you would think we would have done something to slow down the blitz but yet only 1 quick slant the entire game. Why? Lastly, special teams, especially Crosby.
                              "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
                              – Benjamin Franklin

                              Comment


                              • I just simple do not for the life of me understand the goal to go distance playcalling. How in the hell are we so bad all year and still so bad? Throw the fad to Finley. I've recalled it twice, last week and in the preseason Cardinal game, both times it worked. Yet we refuse to run it? Or the 2 point conversion play today, Driver BARELY runs a route. Yet we can't run that from the 5 and just have Driver do the same thing except go 3 yards deeper? What gives? I have no confidence that we will score a TD when we get in goal line situations, and with how Crosby has been kicking, I've got no confidence we'll get the field goal either.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X