Reggie Bush a Packer in 2010?

[Lurker64]

take Bush unless too expensive

I thought you wanted to cut Jarrett...

[bobblehead]

I do think he would be a good fit though, we need a really good check down back (and screen reciever) and return guy. I do think he helps us more than a lot of teams, but like many said, he probably thinks he deserves a lot more than he does.

[Fritz]

take Bush unless too expensive

Is this your general philosophy of life, Bretsky?

[gbgary]

take Bush unless too expensive

Is this your general philosophy of life, Bretsky?

evidently it's tiger's.

[Brandon494]

Watch him go to Detroit.

Prob the Skins

I won't have him.

Judging by your recent avatars I kinda figured you didn't like bush

[Brandon494]

take Bush unless too expensive

Is this your general philosophy of life, Bretsky?

evidently it's tiger's.

I'm so sick of hearing about Tiger Woods on every channel and radio station. People need to get over it, he did what pretty much every athlete, rock star, or movie star has done but they are just smarter about it. I mean really, your worth over billion dollars and you can't buy a seperate phone and your leaving voice mails and text messages, come on man, rookie mistake.

[SnakeLH2006]

Bottom Line, if Joe Arrigo and Randolph "WERE" right, (they weren't) and is the reason Snake left PackerChatters for PackerRats...Bush would be the ace that TT wanted over Hawk in that draft. He's stated his love for some Reggie Bush in various quotes pre-post-and post-post draft.

LOL, either way, I loved him in college and the dude (despite knee probs) is very explosive. I'd love to solve our PR and KR with him (STUDLY THERE) and bring him split as the 4th wide (insanely good pass-catcher) and turn of pace back for the right price (maybe $6 million tops and he'd be worth it..gamechanger wise on ST and as a passcatcher). No probs there. Sign the bastard, and you know TT has had a hard-on for some Bush.

Bush is really a top 50 player when healthy in the NFL...given his injuries..he's bound to have a deece rate at FA, but he STILL could explode given he's young and full of talent. I'd sign the guy to rape some ST at PR and KR (he's proven to beast there) and some change of pace at RB/WR. I still don't feel they use him right at NO. We could use some playmakers....Look what Percy Harvin does for Minn.????

[Fritz]

Bottom Line, if Joe Arrigo and Randolph "WERE" right, (they weren't) and is the reason Snake left PackerChatters for PackerRats...Bush would be the ace that TT wanted over Hawk in that draft. He's stated his love for some Reggie Bush in various quotes pre-post-and post-post draft.

LOL, either way, I loved him in college and the dude (despite knee probs) is very explosive. I'd love to solve our PR and KR with him (STUDLY THERE) and bring him split as the 4th wide (insanely good pass-catcher) and turn of pace back for the right price (maybe $6 million tops and he'd be worth it..gamechanger wise on ST and as a passcatcher). No probs there. Sign the bastard, and you know TT has had a hard-on for some Bush.

Bush is really a top 50 player when healthy in the NFL...given his injuries..he's bound to have a deece rate at FA, but he STILL could explode given he's young and full of talent. I'd sign the guy to rape some ST at PR and KR (he's proven to beast there) and some change of pace at RB/WR. I still don't feel they use him right at NO. We could use some playmakers....Look what Percy Harvin does for Minn.????

But Snakey, TT is also a faithful kinda guy, and he's already got his bush: Jarrett Bush. He only wants one Bush at a time.

[Partial]

I would love to see Reggie Bush. I'm a huge fan of his. I would be pretty darn happy with the off-season if they kept Collins and Pickett as well as signing Bush.

I've been calling for an "athlete" for a few years now, from Teddy Ginn, to Harvin. We really need a versatile player that creates match-up problems. Grant isn't a game breaker but he has shown this year that when running angry he can be good enough to rely on to keep the chains moving. Bush could be used as a punt returner (though I think Blackmon is pretty good at this), a receiver, a wildcat QB, in many formations really.

Personally, I'd love to see a formation with three receivers on one side. Jermichael, Bush, Nelson. Sooo much flexibility! I honestly believe that Bush can be a better wideout than Harvin. He's not as fast and a little shorter, but he's built thicker and could be killer on some routes with that agility and stopping ability.

Sign me up. I'll all in for Bush!

[Brandon494]

Dont see how you think Bush would make a good wildcat QB when we don't run the wildcat nor has he ever run it. I agree he is a game changer that this team could really use.

[bobblehead]

BUSH IN 2012

gonna be my bumber sticker.

[The Shadow]

Don't get the fascination with Reggie Bush.

[packerbacker1234]

Whats all this pub about bush? He's a very minimal factor for the saints, and when all RB's are healthy he barely sees the field.

Why do we all suddenly have a hardon for the kid? He was special in college, but it was White who did all the real work for the trojans, not Bush. Bush just had a lot of flash.

He is a talent, but he wont come here just to play special teams. He wants a shot to start at RB, not become a #4 WR and a king return specialist. He wants to start at his position, and thats not happening with us folks. Grant is a much better RB then Bush has been in the NFL, period.

Also, Green looked pretty good at returns before he pulled a hamstring.

[Partial]

I don't think he'll start anywhere as a traditional running back. I think you could woo him if you promised him plenty of touches (performance pending, obviously).

I don't think he's consistently a receiver or a back. You've gotta line him up all over the field to create mismatches. He's a faster, slightly bigger, quicker but less tough version of DD. I don't think he has burner speed like Ted Ginn, but he is quick as can be.

I think he'd be a good wild cat direct-snap kind of guy because he is so good in space. The problem with him as a traditional RB is rarely is he going to get the space needed to juke somebody out of their jock when running between the tackles. NFL LB's have too good of closing speed to pitch it outside for him.

I think the key will be lining him out wide and getting him isolated with a CB. If you can get him behind a pick and give him a few feet he'll be able to get some yards.

He's faster, bigger, stronger, more athletic and has better vision and hands than Westbrook of the Eagles. I have little reason to believe that he can't be as successful, if not moreso. I haven't done any thorough analysis or anything like that but I would be interested in a compare and contrast of how the Eagles have used Westie over the past several years in comparison to how the Saints have used Bush. I would think we'd see some pretty big differences. I cannot imagine that they're setting him up for success and he's failing with his athletic ability. I could be wrong, though.

[Brando19]

I don't think he'll start anywhere as a traditional running back. I think you could woo him if you promised him plenty of touches (performance pending, obviously).

I don't think he's consistently a receiver or a back. You've gotta line him up all over the field to create mismatches. He's a faster, slightly bigger, quicker but less tough version of DD. I don't think he has burner speed like Ted Ginn, but he is quick as can be.

I think he'd be a good wild cat direct-snap kind of guy because he is so good in space. The problem with him as a traditional RB is rarely is he going to get the space needed to juke somebody out of their jock when running between the tackles. NFL LB's have too good of closing speed to pitch it outside for him.

I think the key will be lining him out wide and getting him isolated with a CB. If you can get him behind a pick and give him a few feet he'll be able to get some yards.

Good post. I agree.