Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Woodson still unsigned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
    its not the players choice. front office signed a rams 27 yo safety and drafted reid in round one.
    So the 49ers front office didn't realize how well Woodson had played against them?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Patler View Post
      So the 49ers front office didn't realize how well Woodson had played against them?
      You weigh out other factors which at the end of the day the front office determines its not worth it.

      It's not black and white like you want to make it.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
        You weigh out other factors which at the end of the day the front office determines its not worth it.

        It's not black and white like you want to make it.
        Nah, I've never been one to make it a b/w issue. I just think in Woodson's case he really did not play that well in 2012. You seem to be of an opinion that he did. That's all.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
          this is not dd -- plays at a much higher level when on the field. mentioned other issues. it is not always about the level of play.

          recall in 2006, woodson had little interest with many speculating career was over.

          cw has something left in the tank in a specialized role.
          Motivational speaker.
          When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by denverYooper View Post
            Motivational speaker.
            did you watch the playoff games?

            are you a motivational speaker?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
              Sure, Woodson can still make a play here or there, just like Driver last year. Unlike Driver however, the Packers don't want him back, even it seems, at a discount. Maybe the Packers player personnel guys know more than 49er players.
              Cleft, ever the voice of reason

              +1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
              --
              Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Guiness View Post
                Cleft, ever the voice of reason

                +1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
                Yes but $$THAT CONTRACT$$ was for alot of $$COIN$$.

                Charles Woodson would 'reasonably' need to get his head set on a conservative minimum 70-80% reduction in that Packer salary....more.

                PACKERS !
                ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Guiness View Post
                  Cleft, ever the voice of reason

                  +1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
                  Agreed -- not worth 10 million per year.

                  Play is another story.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Guiness View Post
                    Cleft, ever the voice of reason

                    +1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
                    BTW Packer Personnel do make mistakes -- just ask this board.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Visiting the Denver Broncos today.

                      Charles Woodson is set to visit with the Broncos on Wednesday for both sides to determine whether Denver is a good fit.

                      Comment


                      • #71


                        Offer from the Raiders and interest from the Panthers.

                        Amazing the board missed this...

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                          http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...fer-agent-says

                          Offer from the Raiders and interest from the Panthers.

                          Amazing the board missed this...
                          Good thing agents never put out false information about offers from other teams when their player is visiting a different team.
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                            http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...fer-agent-says

                            Offer from the Raiders and interest from the Panthers.

                            Amazing the board missed this...
                            Didn't miss it. Saw it this morning, came to post it, and saw that you already had.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Zool View Post
                              Good thing agents never put out false information about offers from other teams when their player is visiting a different team.
                              It is all about commissions baby.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                It will be interesting to see what kind of salary these teams are offering Charles. I would think he'd prefer Denver seeing that is the only playoff caliber team expressing any interest in him these days.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X