Originally posted by rbaloha1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Woodson still unsigned
Collapse
X
-
-
Nah, I've never been one to make it a b/w issue. I just think in Woodson's case he really did not play that well in 2012. You seem to be of an opinion that he did. That's all.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View PostYou weigh out other factors which at the end of the day the front office determines its not worth it.
It's not black and white like you want to make it.
Comment
-
Motivational speaker.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Postthis is not dd -- plays at a much higher level when on the field. mentioned other issues. it is not always about the level of play.
recall in 2006, woodson had little interest with many speculating career was over.
cw has something left in the tank in a specialized role.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment
-
Cleft, ever the voice of reasonOriginally posted by Cleft Crusty View PostSure, Woodson can still make a play here or there, just like Driver last year. Unlike Driver however, the Packers don't want him back, even it seems, at a discount. Maybe the Packers player personnel guys know more than 49er players.
+1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
Yes but $$THAT CONTRACT$$ was for alot of $$COIN$$.Originally posted by Guiness View PostCleft, ever the voice of reason
+1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
Charles Woodson would 'reasonably' need to get his head set on a conservative minimum 70-80% reduction in that Packer salary....more.
PACKERS !** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
Agreed -- not worth 10 million per year.Originally posted by Guiness View PostCleft, ever the voice of reason
+1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
Play is another story.
Comment
-
BTW Packer Personnel do make mistakes -- just ask this board.Originally posted by Guiness View PostCleft, ever the voice of reason
+1 to the Packer personnel guys having a better idea. I can't think of too many (non-QB) old FAs that switch teams and go on to play well elsewhere. I would think the evaluation done by their current team is generally a pretty accurate one, and if they decide he's not worth a contract, he probably isn't.
Comment
-
Good thing agents never put out false information about offers from other teams when their player is visiting a different team.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Posthttp://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...fer-agent-says
Offer from the Raiders and interest from the Panthers.
Amazing the board missed this...
Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
Didn't miss it. Saw it this morning, came to post it, and saw that you already had.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Posthttp://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/92...fer-agent-says
Offer from the Raiders and interest from the Panthers.
Amazing the board missed this...
Comment

Comment