Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Woodson still unsigned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Pugger View Post
    It will be interesting to see what kind of salary these teams are offering Charles. I would think he'd prefer Denver seeing that is the only playoff caliber team expressing any interest in him these days.
    My guess is incentive based which is what TT did initially with CW.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
      My guess is incentive based which is what TT did initially with CW.
      Ya, don't know how you could do anything else with his history. A couple broken legs, a couple broken collar bones, a toe issue that seems to be chronic, shoulders that have cause him to miss practices, etc. Might play all 16, might play only 1 or 2 at his age with his history.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Patler View Post
        Ya, don't know how you could do anything else with his history. A couple broken legs, a couple broken collar bones, a toe issue that seems to be chronic, shoulders that have cause him to miss practices, etc. Might play all 16, might play only 1 or 2 at his age with his history.
        Sounds like a pro football warrior.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
          Sounds like a pro football warrior.
          No doubt.

          Comment


          • #80
            I can't believe that Mckenzie would be interested, given that he is blowing up that team. He knows better than taking away practice reps and game time from young bucks he's trying to develop.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
              I can't believe that Mckenzie would be interested, given that he is blowing up that team. He knows better than taking away practice reps and game time from young bucks he's trying to develop.
              Demonstrates McKenzie believes CW can still play. Plus CW when facing veteran dvision rival qbs Manning and Brees.

              Recall Mike McKenzie comments about Shermy -- it will be interesting if CW says something about Capers once signed.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                Demonstrates McKenzie believes CW can still play.
                do we have the details on the contract offer yet?

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                  do we have the details on the contract offer yet?
                  Why would an agent release this stuff when he is still negotiating with other teams? Time is on the side of CW.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                    Why would an agent release this stuff when he is still negotiating with other teams? Time is on the side of CW.
                    to increase the value of his client, assuming an actual offer exists. I suspect McKenzie is just doing a favor for an old friend and formerly great player, going along with the fiction of a real tryout and real offer. That being said, I can still see a team signing Woodson, much like I thought Driver might get signed last year by a team like Cleveland, had the Packers released him. If you have a depleted roster at a specific position, it can be OK to bring in a totally spent veteran with a lot of experience to be a leader in the locker room, during practice, run a few downs, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                      to increase the value of his client, assuming an actual offer exists. I suspect McKenzie is just doing a favor for an old friend and formerly great player, going along with the fiction of a real tryout and real offer. That being said, I can still see a team signing Woodson, much like I thought Driver might get signed last year by a team like Cleveland, had the Packers released him. If you have a depleted roster at a specific position, it can be OK to bring in a totally spent veteran with a lot of experience to be a leader in the locker room, during practice, run a few downs, etc.
                      This is an expected response from you.

                      We shall hopefully find out soon about the "fictional" contract.

                      Tell you what if you win -- I promise you a date with Lenay Kekua

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                        Tell you what if you win -- I promise you a date with Lenay Kekua
                        She is certainly too young - and too insubstantial - for Cleft Crusty. Note that my heart probably cannot survive extended periods above 50bpm.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                          She is certainly too young - and too insubstantial - for Cleft Crusty. Note that my heart probably cannot survive extended periods above 50bpm.
                          Don't worry -- promise to coach her to go slow and easy. BTW Lenay is in the top 100 of hottest Maxim women

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Post
                            Why would an agent release this stuff when he is still negotiating with other teams? Time is on the side of CW.
                            Because that is how they increase offers teams have made, or will make. Contract language (or failing that, a contract demand) leaks for a reason and it isn't because of respect for the media or the public's right to know.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                              Because that is how they increase offers teams have made, or will make. Contract language (or failing that, a contract demand) leaks for a reason and it isn't because of respect for the media or the public's right to know.
                              Good point -- trust CW's agent will get the best offer possible for client whatever methods he desires.

                              Comment


                              • #90


                                Giants also interested.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X