The "winner" due to the Bulaga injury (and continued absence of Sherrod) is probably Greg Van Roten. I thought he might be the odd man out this year, but with Barclay now probably taking more reps at Tackle, his role should become more prominent. The top 8 now are probably EDS, Lang, Sitton, Van Roten, Bakhtiari, Datko, Newhouse and Barclay. They might keep 9 if Sherrod is on the roster.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bulaga hurt?
Collapse
X
-
Losing Bulaga sucks pretty hard but what REALLY sucks is when the next tackle goes down. Season hasn't even started yet. We'll probably get to see a Bandaid on top of a bandaid on top of a premium line position at some point.70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.
Comment
-
Without Rodgers, we're better than a bottom 10 team??Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostAs much as I want top agree with things you say, you lose all credibility saying we will pick in the top ten
We're a QB driven team - so much so that even our defense is built, to whatever extent, on the assumption that our offense is going to get us off to an early and big lead; hence, no need to play run defense, right??
What does this team look like with Graham Harrell, BJ Coleman, or Vince Young under center??
We can't run the ball, we can't stop the run, and our defense is prone to mind-numbing breakdowns that send Pop Warner turning over in his grave.
No, make no mistake - if Rodgers went down week 1, I don't see any way we could even go 8-8.wist
Comment
-
I think most NFL teams are in danger of being bottom 10 if they lose their starting QB for an extended period of time.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
I agree... don't know why my saying that would send the homers into a tizzy.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostI think most NFL teams are in danger of being bottom 10 if they lose their starting QB for an extended period of time.
Unless they truly believe that every player that dons the G&G really is a HOF'er.
Rodgers for the Packers, even moreso than QB's for other teams, masks a lot of our shortcomings - even as I mentioned on defense. Take Rodgers out of the equation, and you have a very pedestrian roster, with a lot of problems on the OL and defense.
The rest of the roster would be exposed for what it is if Rodgers went down - and MM wouldn't be able to coach and gameplan his way around it, there simply isn't enough talent in other areas of the roster.wist
Comment
-
Sorry, my mistake reading your post. I thought you had said it was a foregone conclusion Rodgers was going to get injured and we'd be drafting in the top ten. I agree with you that if Rodgers were to go down week 1 we'd be picking top 10..but I think that's true for every team in the league as well.Originally posted by wist43 View PostWithout Rodgers, we're better than a bottom 10 team??
We're a QB driven team - so much so that even our defense is built, to whatever extent, on the assumption that our offense is going to get us off to an early and big lead; hence, no need to play run defense, right??
What does this team look like with Graham Harrell, BJ Coleman, or Vince Young under center??
We can't run the ball, we can't stop the run, and our defense is prone to mind-numbing breakdowns that send Pop Warner turning over in his grave.
No, make no mistake - if Rodgers went down week 1, I don't see any way we could even go 8-8.Go PACK
Comment
-
Another take on Bakhitiari from Doug Farrar: http://nfl.si.com/2013/08/05/the-all...y-left-tackle/
Interesting quote:
As Greg Cosell of NFL Films and ESPN’s NFL Matchup recently told me, Bakhtiari plays shorter than he is – he’s 6-foot-4 and 300 pounds, but he comes off the ball like a 6-foot-2 guy, because he tends to bend at the waist at times. However, I would also say that he plays heavier than he is – because he has an excellent understanding of leverage, he’s able to move people in ways you’d expect of a man 25 pounds heavier.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment
-
Translation: looks like Manute Bol, plays like Robert "Tractor" Traylor.Originally posted by denverYooper View PostAnother take on Bakhitiari from Doug Farrar: http://nfl.si.com/2013/08/05/the-all...y-left-tackle/
Interesting quote:As Greg Cosell of NFL Films and ESPN’s NFL Matchup recently told me, Bakhtiari plays shorter than he is – he’s 6-foot-4 and 300 pounds, but he comes off the ball like a 6-foot-2 guy, because he tends to bend at the waist at times. However, I would also say that he plays heavier than he is – because he has an excellent understanding of leverage, he’s able to move people in ways you’d expect of a man 25 pounds heavier.
Comment
-
Its entirely possible I posted otherwise in 2009 because I tend to root for the best athletes to outright win positions as it helps the overall talent level of the team (see Sherrod Derek, or McMillan, Jerome).Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostI'm just saying that you don't know a damn thing until real game conditions.
But as I recall, Barbre had trouble all camp long and in preseason too. His best practices were always in shorts.
The one that got away is Giacomini, who starts and apparently plays well for the Seahawks at RT.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Credit to you pitt, you called it that the Bulaga injury would reshuffle players to their strengths, at least Datko. But it was even better in some ways.Originally posted by pittstang5 View PostI read that article too. Made me feel a little better, but maybe that's McGinn's job. We can only wait and see. Like most have said, at least they have about a month to get this fixed.
We're all tired of the o-line woes, year after year. The shuffling of lineman in the off-season gave a very small sense of hope, but now, we're just right back to where we have been.
Barclay got some first team reps at RT (still played C and G), Datko got 2nd team reps at LT and GVR was the primary backup center.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
MM says no final decision made yet on Bulaga. Still waiting for diagnosis.
Jordy out rest of TC. Hope to have him for start of season. Had procedure done on his knee.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Right. My recollection is that Barbre was basically anointed the starting RT based on OTA's. His struggles in preseason were somewhat overshadowed by Rodgers' lights out performance in preseason games. I remember being surprised that they gave up on Giaco as early as they did.Originally posted by pbmax View PostIts entirely possible I posted otherwise in 2009 because I tend to root for the best athletes to outright win positions as it helps the overall talent level of the team (see Sherrod Derek, or McMillan, Jerome).
But as I recall, Barbre had trouble all camp long and in preseason too. His best practices were always in shorts.
The one that got away is Giacomini, who starts and apparently plays well for the Seahawks at RT.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
-
WTF is wrong with McGinn?Originally posted by Joemailman View Posthttp://www.jsonline.com/sports/packe...218460911.html
McGinn with an upbeat, "the sky is not falling article. That's what I like about McGinn. He tries to offer a different perspective on things. And he's often right.
He's all happy and shit.
Comment

Comment