Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Official Gameweek Discussion thread: 2013 Season Opener: Packers v 49ers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I read House and Hyde will both see time.

    Comment


    • #62
      Music to my ears "Matthews says Packers ready to test rules on hitting option quarterbacks"
      http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/222386531.html

      Now back up that attitude and plant that QB.
      2025 Ratpickers champion.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by MadScientist View Post
        Music to my ears "Matthews says Packers ready to test rules on hitting option quarterbacks"
        http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/222386531.html

        Now back up that attitude and plant that QB.
        Which of course has Douchebaugh concerned:
        No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

        Comment


        • #64
          "Well, my opinion is when a quarterback, before he is declared being a runner, he should be afforded protection that all quarterbacks are afforded until he declares and gets out of the pocket and starts running the ball or running the option or carrying out a bootleg and attempting a run or a pass when he’s outside the pocket," Harbaugh said.

          I thinks that's actually spot on. The minute it looks like he's running the option, he's fair game.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
            Which of course has Douchebaugh concerned:
            http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/222403721.html
            What a tool

            Originally posted by Hairball
            You’re hearing a lot of tough talk right now, intimidating type of talk, the kind of things, the same thing we were hearing a couple of years ago. It sounds like targeting a specific player. You definitely start to wonder.
            Hairball is using loaded words, trying to make this look like the bounty scandal without the bounty. on his side: The NFL, who wants to keep dynamic players like Kap healthy. It's good for the bottom line. Against him: The rule book, that cannot protect a QB, like a QB once he becomes a runner or a potential runner On his side: The gray area before a QB 'declares' himself a runner, especially outside the pocket.

            Bottom line is that the refs are going to protect Kap until and unless he is obviously running the ball. Ultimately, if he is in the pocket and still has the ball, he is a QB. Outside the pocket is where it gets interesting. Since he can still pitch the ball, run or throw, he has to be treated like a runner. Michael Vick always complained that he was being beaten up and didn't get the same protection as other QBs. This is why: because once you're outside the pocket, the defense has no way of knowing what you will do and must treat you as a run threat.

            Will the NFL protect Kap from hard, crushing hits outside the pocket? Will the Packers actually be able to deliver such hits? Find out Sunday.
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by VegasPackFan View Post
              Jason Wilde says no Casey Heyward Sunday - OUT.
              This is starting to feel like one of those injuries that is going to hang on all year, or one they will play around with for a month or two, before pulling the plug on his season.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by VegasPackFan View Post
                "Well, my opinion is when a quarterback, before he is declared being a runner, he should be afforded protection that all quarterbacks are afforded until he declares and gets out of the pocket and starts running the ball or running the option or carrying out a bootleg and attempting a run or a pass when he’s outside the pocket," Harbaugh said.

                I thinks that's actually spot on. The minute it looks like he's running the option, he's fair game.
                I think once outside the pocket, they have to allow him to be hit like a runner, period. Anything else will be a joke. Re-read the way Hairball phrases it though - as if there is a way of being outside the pocket and not yet 'declared' as a runner.
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Patler View Post
                  This is starting to feel like one of those injuries that is going to hang on all year, or one they will play around with for a month or two, before pulling the plug on his season.
                  Return IR!
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Clay seems to think the rules will allow hits on QB in the pocket, if Kap fakes the option

                    Originally posted by claymaker
                    it looks like as long as that quarterback carries out that play fake, he loses his right as a pocket passer and the rules that govern that.
                    How is that fundamentally different from a play action pass?
                    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      As long as they allow what the Ravens and Seahawks did, it should be fine. Just don't hit him in the head.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Good conversation on this topic. HOWEVER, it assumes we do something other than arm-flailing and wild over-pursuit type BS this time around. You actually have to get to him and hit him solidly for any of this to be relevant.

                        /sarcasm off

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                          Clay seems to think the rules will allow hits on QB in the pocket, if Kap fakes the option



                          How is that fundamentally different from a play action pass?
                          Play-action is a fake hand off. At no time does the QB pretend to run the ball. In the read option, the QB fakes running the ball (or just actually runs the ball). When the QB is faking being a runner, he can get planted like a runner. It may not matter if he is still in the pocket. There may still be some protection if he throws a pass, in regards to being hit after the pass, but less so if he pitches the ball. With this talk, it would be great if the refs came out with the specifics.
                          2025 Ratpickers champion.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by MadScientist View Post
                            Play-action is a fake hand off. At no time does the QB pretend to run the ball. In the read option, the QB fakes running the ball (or just actually runs the ball). When the QB is faking being a runner, he can get planted like a runner. It may not matter if he is still in the pocket. There may still be some protection if he throws a pass, in regards to being hit after the pass, but less so if he pitches the ball. With this talk, it would be great if the refs came out with the specifics.
                            That definition works for the defense and is logical, but how is the ref supposed to know the difference.

                            Rodgers fakes the same mesh handoff and throws a stick route. Is he not a passer?
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Patler View Post
                              This is starting to feel like one of those injuries that is going to hang on all year, or one they will play around with for a month or two, before pulling the plug on his season.
                              I certainly hope not. With an early season bye, you wonder if they will just hold Hayward out through week 4 and then bring him back.
                              Go PACK

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                                That definition works for the defense and is logical, but how is the ref supposed to know the difference.

                                Rodgers fakes the same mesh handoff and throws a stick route. Is he not a passer?
                                Exactly. you don't know until after the QB 'declares' himself a runner or passer - that is, after the fact. Kinda like Bugs Bunny figuring out if a bomb is a dud by hitting it with a hammer.
                                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X