Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Josh Sitton.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I despise the phrasing "put some positions in front of the others". I understand the sentiment he was getting at, but that choice of wording doesn't sound very good.

    Just say that in the era of the salary cap, it is sometimes necessary to forego a large contract to an aging veteran so you can have the resources to keep younger, team-developed talent who also require a payday. While it is true that Sitton's position was one that made him more expendable than other positions might have, it was also his age and injury potential. If Sitton was 26, he'd likely still be playing for the Packers...OG or not.
    It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by King Friday View Post
      Sitton just made himself an enemy to the Green Bay fans, which he will come to regret in time...just as others who pulled similar stunts have.
      Unreal. Sitton is an enemy of the people because the Packers cut him? You have zero idea what actually happened.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by King Friday View Post
        Just say that in the era of the salary cap, it is sometimes necessary to forego a large contract to an aging veteran so you can have the resources to keep younger, team-developed talent who also require a payday.
        Fine. so why are you blaming Sitton?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by King Friday View Post
          For the Packer brass, it sends an important message to the TEAM that griping about contracts and looking out for yourself isn't tolerated. While the Packers take it in the shorts a bit on this one, they may head off a larger problems down the road due to how they handled this one. This was an unfortunate situation, but that is how the NFL works and it isn't the last time we'll see it.
          Wilde asked the question about the locker room post-Sitton, phrasing it in terms of potential effect. McCarthy did answer that everyone, players included, are evaluated in terms of the effect it might have on the locker room.

          I'm not sure this was a confirmation of the haughty and uncommunicative report that it looks out of context. He didn't deny to or go around the question, but he also didn't address it directly. The most I would glean from this is that Sitton *might* have become a problem and that was a cause for concern.

          So I don't think we have any confirmation that he was a locker room cancer.

          Video: http://www.packers.com/media-center/...6-495e3cc50510
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by King Friday View Post
            For the Packer brass, it sends an important message to the TEAM that griping about contracts and looking out for yourself isn't tolerated.
            So we are in agreement that the PAcker brass was probably sending a message. It is a little funny that Sitton is accused of being both non-communicative and doing excessive griping.

            This is all bullshit. The GM gets compared to Vince Lombardi when he plays hardball. The player's character is damned based on no evidence when there is a contract dispute. Always works this way, especially in WI's authoritarian culture.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
              Pugger, I generally agree with what you say, but Colledge was not a bad player. He had a long career as an NFL starter.
              He was average and yes, a lot of guys like him carve out a nice career playing like he did.

              Sitton wasn't the player he is today when he started his career so perhaps Taylor can be developed just like Josh was.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                Yes, but Sitton being mad about management refusing to negotiate could be how McCarthy defines a "locker room issue."

                We're judging a situation from afar.

                I agree with you Sitton agreed to give his best in 2016 as part of his contract and owes it to the team. BTW, why would he not do that when he is in a critical contract year?
                I'm happy for Josh for the deal he got from the Bears. There was no way he was gonna get that from us in 2017. But maybe now we can keep the rest of our line intact in 2017 and beyond.

                Comment


                • Only way I can see Sitton as the bad guy in this is if he was getting shitty specifically to be released and become a free agent. If he has a bad attitude (**if**) and it was earnest and not strategic, he's really no different than any other high-profile player.

                  Comment


                  • I would prefer strategic bad attitude, actually.

                    Easier to deal with the predictable than the unpredictable folks losing their heads. For examples, watch any Bengals playoff game.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
                      I'll bet Sitton doesn't make it to the end of the season.

                      I virtually guarantee he doesn't finish out this contract.
                      I would not be at all surprised if he contracted AIDS.

                      Sitton got too big for his britches. He was disloyal.


                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                        Sitton wasn't the player he is today when he started his career so perhaps Taylor can be developed just like Josh was.
                        Could be, could be. We'll give him a mulligan for this preseason.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          Wilde asked the question about the locker room post-Sitton, phrasing it in terms of potential effect. McCarthy did answer that everyone, players included, are evaluated in terms of the effect it might have on the locker room.

                          I'm not sure this was a confirmation of the haughty and uncommunicative report that it looks out of context. He didn't deny to or go around the question, but he also didn't address it directly. The most I would glean from this is that Sitton *might* have become a problem and that was a cause for concern.

                          So I don't think we have any confirmation that he was a locker room cancer.

                          Video: http://www.packers.com/media-center/...6-495e3cc50510
                          This is bordering on unbelievable. They didn't cut him because they think Taylor's better. It could have all started last year, but if Sitton was a model teammate and wasn't a disruptive presence regarding his position at the bottom of the new contract priority list - or some other reason - then why WOULD they cut him? And THEN make up stuff about his attitude? That's not a sound strategy for team unity.
                          Last edited by vince; 09-05-2016, 03:25 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                            So we are in agreement that the PAcker brass was probably sending a message. It is a little funny that Sitton is accused of being both non-communicative and doing excessive griping.

                            This is all bullshit. The GM gets compared to Vince Lombardi when he plays hardball. The player's character is damned based on no evidence when there is a contract dispute. Always works this way, especially in WI's authoritarian culture.
                            I can't discern any bias whatsoever there.

                            Comment


                            • You got to go with the player today, it's Labor Day.

                              Comment


                              • Comment

                                Working...
                                X