Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brian Gutekunst, Making No Sense

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
    Janis is an Unrestricted Free Agent . Who's to say they even bring him back at the minimum, or otherwise? I guess we'll find out.
    I'm all for playing Janis at receiver, but if the Packers are serious about special teams, Janis is a must resign. If there's a prototype gunner, Janis is it - the perfect combination of size and speed. Deserves at least $2M/yr.

    Belichick keeps 2-3 players solely for special teams every season, and I'm not talking about the kicker, punter and long snapper. Matthew Slater, for example, can't hold Janis' jockstrap as a receiver, but he continues to win rings with the Pats b/c of his special teams kung fu.

    Comment


    • #47
      Janis doesn't deserve anywhere near $2M a year. Vet minimum with a small signing bonus or he can be sent packing.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
        I'm all for playing Janis at receiver, but if the Packers are serious about special teams, Janis is a must resign. If there's a prototype gunner, Janis is it - the perfect combination of size and speed. Deserves at least $2M/yr.

        Belichick keeps 2-3 players solely for special teams every season, and I'm not talking about the kicker, punter and long snapper. Matthew Slater, for example, can't hold Janis' jockstrap as a receiver, but he continues to win rings with the Pats b/c of his special teams kung fu.
        Is he making 2+ mil per year?
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          Is he making 2+ mil per year?
          Not sure, but Bush's last contract with the Packers averaged about $1.75 M/yr (3 yrs/ $5.25, $1M signing bonus, according to spotrac.com). Janis is just as good, if not better, a gunner/special teams ace as Bush was.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
            McCarthy should've played Janis over that sloth Allison. Barr's monstrous hit didn't end the Packers' season. Allison's fumble did. Odds are, Janis would've caught the rock in that instance and then, via his awesome speed, dashed into the endzone.
            That could be true. More likely the season would have ended several plays earlier with Janis running the wrong route. But the coaches know he doesn't know the offense from previous stints on the field in games - and in practice.
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
              That could be true. More likely the season would have ended several plays earlier with Janis running the wrong route. But the coaches know he doesn't know the offense from previous stints on the field in games - and in practice.
              Janis scored 30 on the Wonderlic. Dude's smart enough to run a deep post if they need him to run a deep post.

              The more logical explanation: the coaches failed to utilize Janis, much in the same manner that Thompson failed to utilize Belichickism.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                Janis scored 30 on the Wonderlic. Dude's smart enough to run a deep post if they need him to run a deep post.

                The more logical explanation: the coaches failed to utilize Janis, much in the same manner that Thompson failed to utilize Belichickism.
                There are a lot of smart players who cannot play pro football well. Its muscle memory, not immediate recall.

                Knowing what route is called and actually running it against physical equals are two different things. I cannot find the video, but last year Janis ran a slant and a LB read it and stood in his way. Janis' entire body reacted with surprise and like he had no idea what to do if things on the field did not look like the whiteboard.

                He half heartedly continued after a slight pause, bumped into the LB and fell backward in an attempt to draw a flag. It might have been the worst slant route I have ever seen in my life. Brutal. He is used to dominating the opposition and has not adjusted to the level of resistance he meets on offense.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                  There are a lot of smart players who cannot play pro football well. Its muscle memory, not immediate recall.

                  Knowing what route is called and actually running it against physical equals are two different things. I cannot find the video, but last year Janis ran a slant and a LB read it and stood in his way. Janis' entire body reacted with surprise and like he had no idea what to do if things on the field did not look like the whiteboard.

                  He half heartedly continued after a slight pause, bumped into the LB and fell backward in an attempt to draw a flag. It might have been the worst slant route I have ever seen in my life. Brutal. He is used to dominating the opposition and has not adjusted to the level of resistance he meets on offense.
                  Yes, Nick Collins scored 5 or something like that on the Wonderlic, and he didn't do too bad on the football field.

                  But just cos Janis is raw and makes a few mental mistakes doesn't mean he can't play. Pretty sure Adams and Nelson made a tons of them too in their first few seasons. And Janis has speed, something that can't be taught, or so the saying goes. When the guys you're playing are as slow as sloths, it doesn't hurt to add some speed.

                  As I stated previously, the coaches should've played Janis over Allison, a slothish JAG. Players like Allison are a dime a dozen. Janis has speed, and when he's on the field with the rock, good things usually happen.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by pbmax View Post

                    He's the perfect receiver for Tebow though.
                    Speaking of Tebow, there's a good chance he might play pro football again. I read somewhere that Vince McMahon is bringing "black" the XFL.

                    Hope to see Tebow and Johhnny Football play pro ball again. I rooted for the two of them to dominate the NFL. (I hope to see Kap back in the NFL next season.)

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                      Janis scored 30 on the Wonderlic. Dude's smart enough to run a deep post if they need him to run a deep post.

                      The more logical explanation: the coaches failed to utilize Janis, much in the same manner that Thompson failed to utilize Belichickism.
                      So you're saying they used Janis better than 30 other teams would. OK, I agree with you.
                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Problem with Belichickism.

                        Every team does it. And it fails most of them miserably, and most of them are far worse off than the Packers over the long run.

                        I think Tank has not quite sussed out the unique quality of the process that gives the Patriots the edge.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          That is the Marty training in him.

                          But you can carry the above preferences too far in analyzing any of those coaches on GMs. Davis loved speed, but he would always take speed with hands if he could get it. As he got older he lost his fastball and took some possibly unwarranted risks.

                          I don't know much about Jerry's adventures, except that his son seems to have had a solid influence.

                          McCarthy might have hesitated to play Bishop, but Bishop wasn't a cure all either. M3 has a preference but he's not into harming himself.
                          agreed, which is why i said they have biases. I guess adding the second part of each one was confusing. Clearly a bias towards a fast physical freak who is assignment perfect is ideal. But given only certain things available coaches and GMs have a bias towards certain guys. My bias is towards instinctual football players with high motors. You cna continue to work on physical traits. A guy with no motor or instincts is limited in a way you can't overcome.
                          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                            Not sure, but Bush's last contract with the Packers averaged about $1.75 M/yr (3 yrs/ $5.25, $1M signing bonus, according to spotrac.com). Janis is just as good, if not better, a gunner/special teams ace as Bush was.
                            Did Bush ever get any All Pro votes for his ST work?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                              Did Bush ever get any All Pro votes for his ST work?
                              Not according to pro football reference.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                                Problem with Belichickism.

                                Every team does it. And it fails most of them miserably, and most of them are far worse off than the Packers over the long run.

                                I think Tank has not quite sussed out the unique quality of the process that gives the Patriots the edge.
                                With all due respect, you are incorrect.

                                Not every team subscribes to Belichickism. For starter, the Packers under Thompson subscribed to Polar Bearism, also known as Draft and Develop, not Belichickism.

                                And that unique quality that makes the Pats successful? Tom Brady, an elite QB. Put Belichick on the 2017 Browns with Hundley-clone Kizer at QB and no way the Browns are in the Super Bowl. J-Mac subscribed to Belichickism in Denver, but failed mainly b/c he lacked an elite QB.

                                Belichickism works best with an elite QB. Belichick's 6 rings with Brady are proofs.

                                The Packers have an elite QB.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X