Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANOTHER TYPICAL NATIONAL ARTICLE-----MY QUESTION

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
    We don't have the cap space to sign our own next year. If we traded for JuJu I assume it would be a one and done.
    Great point and how much can you give up for a one and done ? Probably not what Pitt wants
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
      Great point and how much can you give up for a one and done ? Probably not what Pitt wants
      We could give a 3rd and 6th. Pitt would get a 4th next year if he walked after 2020.
      But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

      -Tim Harmston

      Comment


      • #18
        Juju would just be more of what we already have - a pretty good but not very fast WR. I'd still like to see us get a speed guy, but we absolutely don't need just more of the same.
        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

        Comment


        • #19
          If you think JuJu compares to anyone on our roster but Adams you are completely ignorant.
          But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

          -Tim Harmston

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
            Juju would just be more of what we already have - a pretty good but not very fast WR. I'd still like to see us get a speed guy, but we absolutely don't need just more of the same.
            Absolutely Not and please don’t insult him that way. He can get separation and “get open”. He has tons of “chunk plays”

            That is not more of what we have.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
              Looks like they didn’t need to trade up to get Jordan Love. Seahawks were working a trade with Packers too per John Schnieder.

              https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...2020-nfl-draft
              There is no mention of the Seahawks in this article.
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                After reading about sources post draft this is what I had come to believe.

                And giving up that 4th cost us the chip needed for a WR in round 2
                I'd like the pick back, but you have NO idea if they would have grabbed a WR.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                  There is no mention of the Seahawks in this article.
                  There ya go. I don’t make things up.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
                    There ya go. I don’t make things up.

                    https://www.fieldgulls.com/2020/4/23...nfl-draft-news
                    The other story of the Colts possibly not moving up is more damning. This just means the target wasn't the Seahawks.

                    Gute says he got a better deal. Was that the one pick higher or less compensation? Who knows.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                      The other story of the Colts possibly not moving up is more damning. This just means the target wasn't the Seahawks.

                      Gute says he got a better deal. Was that the one pick higher or less compensation? Who knows.
                      I think the Packer brain trust believes they got the “2nd coming of Patrick Mahommes” and they weren’t gonna take any chance of not getting him once he became available in lower 20’s. They had to have him.

                      Time will tell.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
                        I think the Packer brain trust believes they got the “2nd coming of Patrick Mahommes” and they weren’t gonna take any chance of not getting him once he became available in lower 20’s. They had to have him.

                        Time will tell.
                        That is entirely possible.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          That is entirely possible.
                          Seems like the most likely scenario to me. They fell in love with a guy they thought they had no chance of getting. It's going to be a tenure defining pick.
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Zool View Post
                            Seems like the most likely scenario to me. They fell in love with a guy they thought they had no chance of getting. It's going to be a tenure defining pick.
                            The trade up is what kills me about it.

                            At least it wasn't a punter.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                              The trade up is what kills me about it.

                              At least it wasn't a punter.
                              Once again if you think your getting a “Patrick Mahommes Level Talent” what’s a 4th round pick?

                              This Love guy is gonna be watched so so closely with eye balls on every move. It will be interesting how a kid playing at Utah State and basically under the radar will handle this pressure. If things don’t start off at least in the good direction the wheels could come off quickly. Many say the Browns destroyed Kizer’s psyche forever and killed him mentally making him toast. There are a lot of unknown doors too this whole thing. I am also very curious too how far the Packers played this whole tape. I’m hoping and excited to get see him at camp this summer.

                              The time element of waiting is what makes a lot of this so difficult.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I don't mind the pick at all but I really dislike the Mahomes comparison because the odds of that actually playing out are just astronomical. If it's just a "pro-bowl level talent that can consistently lead a good org to the playoffs" I think we'd all be overjoyed. Mahomes may be the best QB ever when all is said and done, as crazy as that sounds when Peyton Manning and Tom Brady exist.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X