Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official 2026 Free Agency/Offseason/Non-Draft Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bobblehead
    replied
    Originally posted by Joemailman View Post

    He let Quay Walker go. Let Hobbs go after 1 year. He is capable of cutting his losses.
    But not this time. Van Mess got the 5th

    Leave a comment:


  • Joemailman
    replied
    Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
    No brainer at that price, IMO.

    I may be in the minority, but I thought he played better last year. In the playoff loss he was pretty active.
    He did player better last year when he was in there. But he's gotta stay healthy. Really played in only 8 games last year. With Parsons out and Gary gone, he should be a starter for the 1st time in his career.

    Leave a comment:


  • George Cumby
    replied
    No brainer at that price, IMO.

    I may be in the minority, but I thought he played better last year. In the playoff loss he was pretty active.

    Leave a comment:


  • pbmax
    replied
    The Leviathon has had his option exercised. LVN signed through 2027.

    Acme Packers Company reporting The Athletic's Matt Schneiderman reporting:

    According to The Athletic’s Matt Schneidman, the Green Bay Packers will be picking up edge rusher Lukas Van Ness’ fifth-year option, which means he will make $13.8 million in guaranteed money in 2027.​

    Leave a comment:


  • Teamcheez1
    replied
    The answer was Yea.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bretsky
    replied
    Originally posted by Fritz View Post

    He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.

    Do it, Guter!

    Have you went insane on me ?

    You don't offer Lucas Van Ness because he sucks

    No production, and a horrible decision by an overrated GM

    Leave a comment:


  • MadScientist
    replied
    Originally posted by Fritz View Post

    He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.

    Do it, Guter!
    He's a year older than the oldest draft pick and 4 years older than the youngest. Age is not the thing, production and projected production is. The reason not to keep him is if the Packers think they can replace what they expect out of LVN in 27 with someone cheaper. I don't know what he's like behind the scenes, and I don't have any clue what the Packers' evaluation of him is. So far he hasn't shown much and he's been inconsistent.

    I won't be upset if they do pay him for year 5, because the Packers know a hell of a lot more about him than I do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joemailman
    replied
    Originally posted by NewsBruin View Post
    Is the 5th year a team option? If we offer it, LVN does not get to decline it to play for another team, correct? I've never heard of a player declining the rookie extension, and surely there would have been one whose opinion is higher than the 5y offer.
    It's a team offer. The player can't decline it, and it's 100% guaranteed so the team can't change their mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • NewsBruin
    replied
    Is the 5th year a team option? If we offer it, LVN does not get to decline it to play for another team, correct? I've never heard of a player declining the rookie extension, and surely there would have been one whose opinion is higher than the 5y offer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joemailman
    replied
    I originally said Nay, but I'm starting to shift a bit. He's not yet 25, and the 5th year option isn't as expensive as what I originally thought, before I went all crazy and looked it up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fritz
    replied
    Originally posted by MadScientist View Post
    What was invested in him is irrelevant. He really hasn't produced much in 3 years, so the only case that can be made for keeping him is what the staff sees in him. Maybe there's something there, but I'd say no from what I've seen.
    He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.

    Do it, Guter!

    Leave a comment:


  • Joemailman
    replied
    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
    Oh....and I think Gutes pays him. Cuz he won't admit he fucked it up.
    He let Quay Walker go. Let Hobbs go after 1 year. He is capable of cutting his losses.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobblehead
    replied
    Oh....and I think Gutes pays him. Cuz he won't admit he fucked it up.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobblehead
    replied
    This is why you don't draft as many projects in todays game (my opinion). They perform just in time to pay them. And if thats the case why not pay a free agent but get 4-5 years of production out of a more ready player?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joemailman
    replied
    IF LVN believes in himself, he might prefer free agency. With a good year, he could be signing a 4 year deal worth 15-20M per year.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X