Originally posted by Joemailman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official 2026 Free Agency/Offseason/Non-Draft Thread
Collapse
X
-
He did player better last year when he was in there. But he's gotta stay healthy. Really played in only 8 games last year. With Parsons out and Gary gone, he should be a starter for the 1st time in his career.Originally posted by George Cumby View PostNo brainer at that price, IMO.
I may be in the minority, but I thought he played better last year. In the playoff loss he was pretty active.
Leave a comment:
-
No brainer at that price, IMO.
I may be in the minority, but I thought he played better last year. In the playoff loss he was pretty active.
Leave a comment:
-
The Leviathon has had his option exercised. LVN signed through 2027.
Acme Packers Company reporting The Athletic's Matt Schneiderman reporting:
According to The Athletic’s Matt Schneidman, the Green Bay Packers will be picking up edge rusher Lukas Van Ness’ fifth-year option, which means he will make $13.8 million in guaranteed money in 2027.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fritz View Post
He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.
Do it, Guter!
Have you went insane on me ?
You don't offer Lucas Van Ness because he sucks
No production, and a horrible decision by an overrated GM
Leave a comment:
-
He's a year older than the oldest draft pick and 4 years older than the youngest. Age is not the thing, production and projected production is. The reason not to keep him is if the Packers think they can replace what they expect out of LVN in 27 with someone cheaper. I don't know what he's like behind the scenes, and I don't have any clue what the Packers' evaluation of him is. So far he hasn't shown much and he's been inconsistent.Originally posted by Fritz View Post
He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.
Do it, Guter!
I won't be upset if they do pay him for year 5, because the Packers know a hell of a lot more about him than I do.
Leave a comment:
-
It's a team offer. The player can't decline it, and it's 100% guaranteed so the team can't change their mind.Originally posted by NewsBruin View PostIs the 5th year a team option? If we offer it, LVN does not get to decline it to play for another team, correct? I've never heard of a player declining the rookie extension, and surely there would have been one whose opinion is higher than the 5y offer.
Leave a comment:
-
Is the 5th year a team option? If we offer it, LVN does not get to decline it to play for another team, correct? I've never heard of a player declining the rookie extension, and surely there would have been one whose opinion is higher than the 5y offer.
Leave a comment:
-
I originally said Nay, but I'm starting to shift a bit. He's not yet 25, and the 5th year option isn't as expensive as what I originally thought, before I went all crazy and looked it up.
Leave a comment:
-
He is still quite young - as young as a few of the guys the Packers just drafted. Presumably, he's advanced from where he was when they drafted him, yet is still young. He's primed for a breakout year - why wouldn't you keep him? He's young and talented and apparently $13 mill a year is not all that much for an EDGE defender. Enagbare got $11 mill a year.Originally posted by MadScientist View PostWhat was invested in him is irrelevant. He really hasn't produced much in 3 years, so the only case that can be made for keeping him is what the staff sees in him. Maybe there's something there, but I'd say no from what I've seen.
Do it, Guter!
Leave a comment:
-
He let Quay Walker go. Let Hobbs go after 1 year. He is capable of cutting his losses.Originally posted by bobblehead View PostOh....and I think Gutes pays him. Cuz he won't admit he fucked it up.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh....and I think Gutes pays him. Cuz he won't admit he fucked it up.
Leave a comment:
-
This is why you don't draft as many projects in todays game (my opinion). They perform just in time to pay them. And if thats the case why not pay a free agent but get 4-5 years of production out of a more ready player?
Leave a comment:
-
IF LVN believes in himself, he might prefer free agency. With a good year, he could be signing a 4 year deal worth 15-20M per year.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: