Perfect Match for WR issue

[Partial]

I would say you have responded with a fair amount of contentless responses when I raised the question of who we should have signed. Greg's a good guy, lay off.

I'll not back off. I'm sick of being attacked, and having the "rules of the majority" not apply to the minority.

Partial, if you don't know what I WANTED through free agency, you don't know how to read.

I have listed SEVERAL positions that I saw as positions of need, and further stated that if the RB position is not addressed there is no point to sign ANYONE, we should just let the young guys play and develop.

I guess Greg needs your help, because he shows up here unarmed everyday in the battle of wits because he has none.

And I have continually asked WHO to sign to fill those needs, because having a need to fill and signing any player to do it is not the right idea. Also, Greg has an opinion then differs then yours. Why does that make him an idiot?

[b bulldog]

Everyone settle down, don't allow the lack of signings to get the best of you.

[retailguy]

And I have continually asked WHO to sign to fill those needs, because having a need to fill and signing any player to do it is not the right idea. Also, Greg has an opinion then differs then yours. Why does that make him an idiot?

When will you figure out that I don't have to march to your drum? I've listed POSITIONS that I see as weakness.

The one thing that I trust Thompson to do is FILL POSITIONS WITH TALENT. In my opinion, it's the best skill he has. The rest of his "GM'ing" is pretty poor.

Greg flip flops more than a fish on the beach. Search his archives. Two days ago, he's talking about how I'm consistent, a couple of weeks back he talks about me moderating his opinion of Sherman. Then today, this shit.

He's devoid of thought, and has ZERO consistency. Plus, it's about time for another of his legendary meltdowns. You know the ones, where he winds up arguing with himself, and the rest of us swear he's about 12.

[MJZiggy]

I would say you have responded with a fair amount of contentless responses when I raised the question of who we should have signed. Greg's a good guy, lay off.

I'll not back off. I'm sick of being attacked, and having the "rules of the majority" not apply to the minority.

Partial, if you don't know what I WANTED through free agency, you don't know how to read.

I have listed SEVERAL positions that I saw as positions of need, and further stated that if the RB position is not addressed there is no point to sign ANYONE, we should just let the young guys play and develop.

I guess Greg needs your help, because he shows up here unarmed everyday in the battle of wits because he has none.

I haven't attacked you. And I disagree with your FA idea right now, but I also agree with what Patler said about not knowing the results of our offseason adventures until the next season. You may be right. I may be right. It doesn't make the one who wasn't an idiot. It simply means they were wrong. I am simply willing to wait and see. I don't see you as "the minority" for thinking that Sherman was a good GM. He took a shot. It didn't work. It ultimately cost him his job, but to suggest that his replacement is intentionally not doing anything and suggesting that he MUST do something you want him to as part of his job description, I believe is wrong as well. It's TT's job and he will do it the way he sees best, just like Sherman did. Just like you do your job even when your decisions aren't popular.

[b bulldog]

I'm about due for a good Favre meltdown with the usual folks in here

[GrnBay007]

I'm about due for a good Favre meltdown with the usual folks in here

:P

[retailguy]

I haven't attacked you. And I disagree with your FA idea right now, but I also agree with what Patler said about not knowing the results of our offseason adventures until the next season. You may be right. I may be right. It doesn't make the one who wasn't an idiot. It simply means they were wrong. I am simply willing to wait and see. I don't see you as "the minority" for thinking that Sherman was a good GM. He took a shot. It didn't work. It ultimately cost him his job, but to suggest that his replacement is intentionally not doing anything and suggesting that he MUST do something you want him to as part of his job description, I believe is wrong as well. It's TT's job and he will do it the way he sees best, just like Sherman did. Just like you do your job even when your decisions aren't popular.

Zig, I don't recall accusing you of attacking me. However, there has been plenty of attacks and piling on. When I've decided to fight back, and respond as I've been responded to, I'm accused of dirty pool.

The mob mentality is alive and well. If you disagree with the majority, there is a price to pay. Ziggy, St. Lou is right. there's a clique here, and if you don't "play by the rules" there is a price to pay.

Go read what people have posted about me in the last two months. Go ahead, READ IT. Just today, Guerski posts about his bachelors degree in econ. Then I post my credentials, and the "masses" mock me.

What about him, Zig? What about him? The only diff is that he's on the "right" side of the mob opinion. That's it.

[Partial]

And I have continually asked WHO to sign to fill those needs, because having a need to fill and signing any player to do it is not the right idea. Also, Greg has an opinion then differs then yours. Why does that make him an idiot?

When will you figure out that I don't have to march to your drum? I've listed POSITIONS that I see as weakness.

The one thing that I trust Thompson to do is FILL POSITIONS WITH TALENT. In my opinion, it's the best skill he has. The rest of his "GM'ing" is pretty poor.

Greg flip flops more than a fish on the beach. Search his archives. Two days ago, he's talking about how I'm consistent, a couple of weeks back he talks about me moderating his opinion of Sherman. Then today, this shit.

He's devoid of thought, and has ZERO consistency. Plus, it's about time for another of his legendary meltdowns. You know the ones, where he winds up arguing with himself, and the rest of us swear he's about 12.

Positions of Needs + Players available != good signing.

This is the point I have been trying to make. They are a young team that is going to take a couple years to be solid across the board. Once you see what you have out of these guys, then you fill the holes. Anything now is overzealous because we know no matter what happens they're going to be bad. The above equation is why Minnesota and Washington fail at being successful teams.

I would argue that everyone has their moments and it is not just Greg. Your response to Collins post was equally immature.

TITTIES BOOBIES ZONGAS MELONS LOVEBAGS TATS FUNBAGS CANS JUGS FACEPILLOWS HOOTERS KNOCKERS SWEATER-PUPPIES

[b bulldog]

I deal with this whenever I go on my usual rants, it is all part of it and it is fun. I enjoy the banter, don't take it so serious.

[Partial]

I deal with this whenever I go on my usual rants, it is all part of it and it is fun. I enjoy the banter, don't take it so serious.

What he said, or else I will start shouting out all the slang terms for my weiner that I can think of.

[retailguy]

Positions of Needs + Players available != good signing.

This is the point I have been trying to make. They are a young team that is going to take a couple years to be solid across the board. Once you see what you have out of these guys, then you fill the holes. Anything now is overzealous because we know no matter what happens they're going to be bad. The above equation is why Minnesota and Washington fail at being successful teams.

I would argue that everyone has their moments and it is not just Greg. Your response to Collins post was equally immature.

TITTIES BOOBIES ZONGAS MELONS LOVEBAGS TATS FUNBAGS CANS JUGS FACEPILLOWS HOOTERS KNOCKERS SWEATER-PUPPIES

Partial, that's where we disagree. There is plenty of available talent. This team could make a run if it chose to. It hasn't.

There are holes to fill. Free agents could have helped. That's not the plan. I'm not happy about that. I don't respect those decisions by Thompson. I don't doubt that rookies can fill the roles, HOWEVER, the odds of that in 2007 aren't high.

I don't understand all the words related to female body parts, but whatever. Maybe it's a statement of your immaturity?

[retailguy]

I deal with this whenever I go on my usual rants, it is all part of it and it is fun. I enjoy the banter, don't take it so serious.

What he said, or else I will start shouting out all the slang terms for my weiner that I can think of.

that's a mature response. Very impressed.

[retailguy]

I deal with this whenever I go on my usual rants, it is all part of it and it is fun. I enjoy the banter, don't take it so serious.

You deal with it your way, I'll deal with mine. Good luck with it. I've done that for a year, and now, I'm done with it.

[MJZiggy]

I haven't attacked you. And I disagree with your FA idea right now, but I also agree with what Patler said about not knowing the results of our offseason adventures until the next season. You may be right. I may be right. It doesn't make the one who wasn't an idiot. It simply means they were wrong. I am simply willing to wait and see. I don't see you as "the minority" for thinking that Sherman was a good GM. He took a shot. It didn't work. It ultimately cost him his job, but to suggest that his replacement is intentionally not doing anything and suggesting that he MUST do something you want him to as part of his job description, I believe is wrong as well. It's TT's job and he will do it the way he sees best, just like Sherman did. Just like you do your job even when your decisions aren't popular.

Zig, I don't recall accusing you of attacking me. However, there has been plenty of attacks and piling on. When I've decided to fight back, and respond as I've been responded to, I'm accused of dirty pool.

The mob mentality is alive and well. If you disagree with the majority, there is a price to pay. Ziggy, St. Lou is right. there's a clique here, and if you don't "play by the rules" there is a price to pay.

Go read what people have posted about me in the last two months. Go ahead, READ IT. Just today, Guerski posts about his bachelors degree in econ. Then I post my credentials, and the "masses" mock me.

What about him, Zig? What about him? The only diff is that he's on the "right" side of the mob opinion. That's it.

You don't accuse me, but it seems that there are attacks and piling on going in both directions and your suggestion of "mob mentality" seems to include us all in the mob. I don't see the mob or the clique, but maybe that's just me. I have read everything posted about you and by you and when you posted your credentials as gureski did, I did not see the "masses" mock you, I saw SC mock you. He does not represent the clique to me, more someone who saw very good credentials and a couple of people making fun with the joke. I (and many others here) am not against you. We merely have differing opinions and I have been finding the attacking of each other rather than attacking of the information that people are posting (with fact of our own) to be bothersome no matter who does it.

[b bulldog]

What was said that pissed you off so?