Tweet
Going the other route with this poll
-
0Green Bay did not win the division0%0Green Bay Did not make the playoffs and win at least 9 games0%0Gren Bay just matches the 2006 8-8 record0%0Green Bay is competitive but finishes with 5-7 wins0%0They are too young to measure failure and I will support TT regardless of record because he's rebuilding0%0TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER -
None of the above.
-
Feel free to suggest a criteria and I'll try to add itOriginally posted by the_idle_threatNone of the above.
For those who love the Snapper I'd be interested in seeing them post what they voted forTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
Criteria
For me, as I've stated before, it's pretty basic. If Thompson has this team headed in the right direction, we should improve upon 8-8. Also, anyone with half a brain can see we have had problems scoring points. The red zone anemia has to be fixed period. No more BS standard pat answers from MM or TT.
Another thing that must be improved upon are the # of drops from our receiving corps. A GM's job is to fix known problems in order that they do not repeat themselves.Comment
-
I would vote for the 4th choice if it said "Green Bay is NOT competitive and finishes with 5-7 wins."
Really, all I ask for is that they are competitive. If they can't do that, they're a failure in my book, and TT would bear a great deal of responsibility for it. If they are competitive but manage to win just 6 or 7 games due to some close losses, I'm not gonna get all bent outta shape and call them a failure. Other teams are expected to be competitive too.
I think the way a team competes in games and the degree to which they appear to be improving over time are the true measures of success, especially for a young team. Win-loss record is not irrelevant, but it's not my primary criterion.Comment
-
If they don't win the SB... and, of course, they have no chance of winning the SB.
After Favre is gone, they'll have no chance for many, many years... at least as long as it takes them to find another franchise QB.wistComment
-
Originally posted by the_idle_threat
I'd like to see some sort of measurables myself.
P.S.- I'd love to have your grading system as my teacher
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
Positive attitude. Yup, that's what we need.Originally posted by wist43
Comment
-
PIPL, this is Wist. It's like having Eeyore on the forum."Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg JenningsComment
-
Wist is Eeyore Rat?Originally posted by 3irty1Comment
-
Thanks for noticing.Comment
-
I do my best... and, surely I must get bonus pts for consistency!!!
wistComment
-
Eeyore Rat! I like it. Mad, this is an official request to change Wist's rat name...--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...Comment
-
Year Three - gotta expect at least .500 or better given the weak division we're in. I'm in for 9-7 with no home blowouts. If that's good enough to make the playoffs - fine. If not I'm okay with a winning record and respectibility at home.60% of the time it works every time.Comment
-
Whats funny is that it isnt the first time Wist was called a jackass.
7-9 or worse would be a failure. Also the OL not gelling and protecting giving #4 time would be a failure IMO.
I dont see the defense being the reason why woudl fail so basically the offense sucks, TT failed.Comment
Comment