Originally posted by The Leaper
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers make feeler offer for now retired Keyshawn Johnson
Collapse
X
-
Favre also had Sharpe to throw to. I truly think that having a top WR like that helped his progression as a QB. It gave him alot of confidence, which is key. That was one of the biggest reasons why I wanted Moss to come here, for Rodgers. I think a top WR can do wonders for bringing a young QB along.
-
back to keshawn, he turned down 8m to play for the Titans and didn't really like the offer by GB (whatever it was) and play with Favre. More than likely he wanted 8M and play with Favre, but Gb said we will have incentives rather than guarantee you the money. With Johnson it isthe money, he already has a ring so it just money. ESPN must be showing a better cash value than the NFL.
Comment
-
The whole deal about whether Rodgers has 'it' or not has been hashed out a million times on this board alone.
While I don't agree with the direction TT has taken in building this team, I have to think he and MM see something in Rodgers. At minimum the ability to be a competant starter.
They wouldn't keep him around, and cut their own necks, just to be obstinate. And MM has no reason to hold on to him at all. There'll be camp bodies, etc around this fall. If Rodgers is as bad as some think he is, he'll be gone by the end of TC this fall.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
At best, Keyshawn would have been a large target in the red zone. If one of our young guys cannot fill that need this year, I certainly wont be crying about how we should have picked up Keyshawn. On the other hand, Moss in my opinion still had some wheels, and would have complimented not just Driver, but Jennings as well.
Again, its a moot point, however if Moss returns to his Pro Bowl form with NE, Thompson is going to be looking pretty damned stupid.
Comment
-
No, because he was a TT first round pick. GM's are to stubburn to admit when they have effed up. Now i, like you guiness, dont agree with the way that TT is takin the team, but we disagree on Rodgers. The little times hes gotten to play , has he dont anything? Yes i know its shit time but still i havent seen a glimpse of anything from this kid. And personally i think TT's throat would be cut faster if they released him now and admited he was a bust(not saying that he is) but its smarter for TT to keep him for a while because first fans arent real happy with TT to start of with and secound he would take even more shit.Originally posted by GuinessThe whole deal about whether Rodgers has 'it' or not has been hashed out a million times on this board alone.
While I don't agree with the direction TT has taken in building this team, I have to think he and MM see something in Rodgers. At minimum the ability to be a competant starter.
They wouldn't keep him around, and cut their own necks, just to be obstinate. And MM has no reason to hold on to him at all. There'll be camp bodies, etc around this fall. If Rodgers is as bad as some think he is, he'll be gone by the end of TC this fall.
Comment
-
To be honest with you, I cannot see why they got rid of Craig Nall. He looked a hell of a lot better than Rogers did. In my opinion anyway. Shit for all that it matters up to this point, lol.......they could have kept Pederson and used that first round pick on a player or position that we actually needed.
Comment
-
"To be honest with you, I cannot see why they got rid of Craig Nall. He looked a hell of a lot better than Rogers did."
Someone get Gureski on the Nall Phone!
[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
Punctuation is good.........Originally posted by Charles WoodsonNo, because he was a TT first round pick. GM's are to stubburn to admit when they have effed up. Now i, like you guiness, dont agree with the way that TT is takin the team, but we disagree on Rodgers. The little times hes gotten to play , has he dont anything? Yes i know its shit time but still i havent seen a glimpse of anything from this kid. And personally i think TT's throat would be cut faster if they released him now and admited he was a bust(not saying that he is) but its smarter for TT to keep him for a while because first fans arent real happy with TT to start of with and secound he would take even more shit.
"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
Comment
-
BH, when do you finish school? We finished todayOriginally posted by BallHawkPunctuation is good.........Originally posted by Charles WoodsonNo, because he was a TT first round pick. GM's are to stubburn to admit when they have effed up. Now i, like you guiness, dont agree with the way that TT is takin the team, but we disagree on Rodgers. The little times hes gotten to play , has he dont anything? Yes i know its shit time but still i havent seen a glimpse of anything from this kid. And personally i think TT's throat would be cut faster if they released him now and admited he was a bust(not saying that he is) but its smarter for TT to keep him for a while because first fans arent real happy with TT to start of with and secound he would take even more shit.

Comment
-
Valid points, but rumor has it that Moss only wanted to sign a one-year contract (which is what he signed with NE), so he could prove his worth and get one last decent payday. Very little chance, IMHO, that Moss would have resigned here if Favre wasn't here.Originally posted by GBRulzFavre also had Sharpe to throw to. I truly think that having a top WR like that helped his progression as a QB. It gave him alot of confidence, which is key. That was one of the biggest reasons why I wanted Moss to come here, for Rodgers. I think a top WR can do wonders for bringing a young QB along."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment


Comment