Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fatties banned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fatties banned

    California Is First State to Ban Trans Fats
    By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
    Published: July 26, 2008
    LOS ANGELES — California, a national trendsetter in all matters edible, became the first state to ban trans fats in restaurants when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill Friday to phase out their use over the next few years.

    Under the new law, the fats must be excised from restaurant products beginning in 2010, and from all retail baked goods by 2011. Packaged manufactured foods will be exempt.

    New York City passed a regulation banning the fats in 2006, which became fully effective on July 1, and Philadelphia, Stamford, Conn., and Montgomery County, Md., have passed similar laws.

    But placing a mandatory ban on the roughly 88,000 restaurants, bakeries and other food purveyors in the nation’s most populous state provides a major legislative boost for the movement against trans-fats. The effort has been led by scientists, doctors and consumer advocates who trace the largely-synthetic fat to a host of health woes, principally heart disease.

    In recent years trans-fats have become almost the new cigarettes among public health policy makers, with consumer behavior as much in the crosshairs as the product itself in governments’ attempt to curb harmful effects.

    “I think the potential here is real for a far greater understanding of the harms of trans-fats,” said Dr. Clyde Yancy, the incoming president of the American Heart Association. “And to encourage more states to do the same.”

    Trans fats are created by pumping hydrogen into liquid oil at high temperature, a process called partial hydrogenation. The process results in an inexpensive fat that prolongs the shelf-life and appearance of packaged foods, but it has repeatedly been found in scientific studies to increase bad cholesterol, which can lead to diabetes and heart disease, California’s leading cause of death.

    Dr. Yancy said that a 2 percent increase in trans-fat intake can result in a 25 percent increase in the likelihood of developing coronary artery disease. “These are data we are just now beginning to understand,” he said. “It is pretty clear now that it was a mistake for us to embrace these fats.”

    Under the new law, restaurants, bakeries, delicatessens, cafeterias and other businesses classified as “food facilities” will have to discontinue use of oils, margarine and shortening containing trans fats in preparing all foods.

    These purveyors will have to keep the labels on their cooking products so that they can be inspected for trans fat, a process that will become part of the duties of local health inspectors. Violators will face fines beginning at $25, and increasing as high as $1,000 for multiple violations.

    The bill was written by Democratic Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, a former 4th grade teacher from southern California who said he was inspired by the number of obese children he saw in school.

    “They are heavy,” Mr. Mendoza said. “They eat out a lot and you realize there are trans fats out there — you don’t want kids to start off on the wrong foot.”

    Opposition to the move came largely from the state’s restaurant association, which argued that singling out trans fats as a singularly harmful food product was arbitrary, and that a mandate would be expensive to implement. Further, the California Restaurant Association asserted that such a ban for health reasons was the purview of the federal government, not the states.

    “We don’t doubt the health findings surrounding trans-fats,” said Lara Dunbar, the senior vice president of government affairs for the association. “Our opposition was philosophical. Banning one product isn’t necessarily the right solution.” Further, Ms. Dunbar said, many of the state’s restaurants have eliminated trans-fats already. “We don’t think you need a mandate,” she said. “Restaurants responded to a consumer demand.”

    Among national chains, Wendy’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Taco Bell, the Cheesecake Factory and McDonalds have all begun to move away from trans fats because of consumer concerns.

    In many high-end restaurants in this state — where the organic foods movement began and where many a food trend has been born — chefs would no more use trans-fats in their cooking than use paper tablecloths in their dining rooms.

    For some restaurateurs, however, the change has been costly, they say, because there are fewer distributors of the alternative oils.

    “The only effect it is going to have on the consumer is that we are going to have to raise our prices,” said Tina Pantazis, the manager of Dino’s Burgers, which operators two hamburger joints, one in Los Angeles and other in Azusa. Ms. Pantazis said that the restaurant’s french fries, which now cost $1.75 per order, will likely be bumped up to at least $2.75.

    The Los Angeles branch of Dino’s has already moved to use the new oils, she said, adding that there were no customer complaints even though she could taste the difference. The Azusa location will move to be compliant soon.

    “I think this is good for the health of the consumer,” Ms. Pantazis said. “On the other hand, people who eat french fries are not concerned with their health that much.”

    New York’s anti-trans-fat movement, led by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, is still in its early days. The first phase began last year, targeting fry oils and spreads. This month, it extended to baked goods. In that time, nearly all the 25,000 restaurants that have been inspected have proved compliant, according to city’s health department. New York also offered a “Trans Fat Help Center” where bakers were schooled in the workability of alternative fats.

    California, which supplies a great deal of the nation’s specialty crops and other goods, already has some of the toughest food restrictions in the nation, including a ban on junk food, and on trans-fats in school meals.

    On Friday, Governor Schwarzenegger, whose consumer interests often align closely with those of Democrats, praised the new law after signing it.

    “California is a leader in promoting health and nutrition, and I am pleased to continue that tradition by being the first state in the nation to phase out trans fats,” he said in a statement. “Consuming trans fat is linked to coronary heart disease, and today we are taking a strong step toward creating a healthier future for California.”

  • #2
    I am totally down with this. Trans fats are so unhealthy, and tough for consumers to avoid. And they aren't necessary.

    I really like Arnold, I would vote for him for president if he wasn't an Australian.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
      I am totally down with this. Trans fats are so unhealthy, and tough for consumers to avoid. And they aren't necessary.
      I'm inclined to agree. When Lays switched from Trans fats I could tell the difference, but it doesn't matter anymore. I still eat 'em.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        HH, I am personally offended that you referred to overweight transgendered persons as "trans fat."

        You don't condemn use of the "N" word and then whisper it under your breath like Jesse did, do you?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
          =I really like Arnold, I would vote for him for president if he wasn't an Australian.
          Then you can vote for him, because he's AUSTRIAN.... Right Tarlam!? :P

          Comment


          • #6
            The God damned nutrition Nazis and compassion Fascists strike again. More government interfering in our lives.

            Oh well, if the taste is a little less good, I'll just load things up with a little more salt.
            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by texaspackerbacker
              The God damned nutrition Nazis and compassion Fascists strike again. More government interfering in our lives.

              Oh well, if the taste is a little less good, I'll just load things up with a little more salt.
              Ya, I figured there'd be some libertarian complaints. I see this as different from banning ice cream sundaes or chocolate-covered coffee beans. Trans Fats are snuck into so many products, the consumer really doesn't know just how nasty that twinky is.

              Trans Fats are the super stars of bad foods. They increase bad cholesterol and reduce good cholesterol. They're pretty close to poison. We do have an FDA to protect the public.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kiwon
                HH, I am personally offended that you referred to overweight transgendered persons as "trans fat."
                no, trans fatties are happy to use that expression, just like the word "queer" and "nigger" can be used by their communities to take ownership of the word.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                  Originally posted by Kiwon
                  HH, I am personally offended that you referred to overweight transgendered persons as "trans fat."
                  no, trans fatties are happy to use that expression, just like the word "queer" and "nigger" can be used by their communities to take ownership of the word.
                  Oh, I stand corrected.

                  Actually, as a perspective member of the Obama nation (pronounced "abomination"), I expect a push to get society to avoid such labels as male/female, fat/skinny, etc., and I was practicing feigned outrage at anything close to anti-PC language.

                  By the way, which forbidden words can WASPs take ownership of?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                    Trans Fats are the super stars of bad foods. They increase bad cholesterol and reduce good cholesterol. They're pretty close to poison. We do have an FDA to protect the public.
                    How about some mandatory exercise instead of punishing businesses for all the fatties too busy to notice what they're eating? Oh that's right, that would infringe on their personal rights. Better to modify their behavior in a passive aggressive manner and make them pay for it with their wallet.
                    "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I don't understand the offense here, people. It's not like your grandma was cooking with transfats to make your birthday cake taste good when you were little. They're caused by chemical additives in your food and they are horrible for you. Didn't you notice that as soon as they noticed how wretched the things were and started making companies put them on the nutrition labels that all the foodmakers started touting their removal? That's even without banning them, but the restaurants were still able to use them without telling you about it. I don't see a problem with making my restaurant use real food without chemical additives like the MSG that I'm overly sensitive to. Can't you just make the food with flavor from the get-go?
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Kiwon
                        By the way, which forbidden words can WASPs take ownership of?
                        Porch Monkey.



                        Kidding. Ofay.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MJZiggy
                          I don't see a problem with making my restaurant use real food without chemical additives like the MSG that I'm overly sensitive to. Can't you just make the food with flavor from the get-go?
                          If you're willing to pay a much higher price for it. Personally I don't like paying twice as much for anything that needs to be cooked in oil because some other people have trouble not stuffing their fat faces with it until they're just about dead from being too fat and then blaming the food instead of their own lack of self respect and will power.

                          What it comes down to is that I like cheap, tasty food. I hate fatties who blame everyone else for them being fat. If it's a real concern for you, then you educate yourself in the smallest degree and you can easily avoid most food that uses transfat or MSG. You don't expect the government to protect you from yourself and hurt an industry (small business restaurants) that already has a high failure rate.
                          "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                            Originally posted by texaspackerbacker
                            The God damned nutrition Nazis and compassion Fascists strike again. More government interfering in our lives.

                            Oh well, if the taste is a little less good, I'll just load things up with a little more salt.
                            Ya, I figured there'd be some libertarian complaints. I see this as different from banning ice cream sundaes or chocolate-covered coffee beans. Trans Fats are snuck into so many products, the consumer really doesn't know just how nasty that twinky is.

                            Trans Fats are the super stars of bad foods. They increase bad cholesterol and reduce good cholesterol. They're pretty close to poison. We do have an FDA to protect the public.
                            Then why do they put them in? Do you think it could be because it makes things taste better? You don't really think it is purely an anti-health conspiracy, do you?

                            It's all a matter of supply and demand. People apparently like to eat the stuff with trans fats in--just like driving without seat belts or cycling without helmets. And you want the God damned government to stick its nose in and REGULATE us? No thanks.

                            I think the true libertarians--Howard and BHead--will get a kick out of you calling me one.

                            Oh yeah, and as a Twinkie lover, I can tell you, the great majority of us don't give a damn about any nasty stuff in them--just how good they taste.
                            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Transfats were not put into food to make them taste better. They were put in so that they could produce the food cheaper without losing flavor, considerations of your health be damned. Skin, have you not noticed that the foods which are suddenly trans fat free do not automatically double in price? Margarine comes to mind as the first obvious example. As soon as they said not to use it because it was full of trans fat, it suddenly became trans fat free and at the same price it was before.
                              "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X