DNC

[HowardRoark]

I hope to write some books that guys like Rush and Hannity will read and deliver to the public in a straightforward manner (particularly on the philosophy of science).

Post a link when you do.

[retailguy]

Man, you just can't read this whole thread and not see what a truly empty person Tyrone is. Arguing with him is like nailing jello to a tree. 20 posts and I've got NO IDEA what his core values are. I do know he can argue like a 5 year old though.

[Maxie the Taxi]

I hope to write some books that guys like Rush and Hannity will read and deliver to the public in a straightforward manner (particularly on the philosophy of science).

Post a link when you do.

mraynrand, have you read any Ludwig von Mises?

[SkinBasket]

[Maxie the Taxi]

Is that Brian Brohm?

[mraynrand]

I hope to write some books that guys like Rush and Hannity will read and deliver to the public in a straightforward manner (particularly on the philosophy of science).

Post a link when you do.

mraynrand, have you read any Ludwig von Mises?

Yep. I even have a LvM T shirt (no shit, I really do. LOL). Ever Read Stanley Jaki? That shit will blow your mind.

[SkinBasket]

Is that Brian Brohm?

Just your average Obama sheep in a state of sexual jubilation at the notion that maybe her mangod might have looked in her general direction during his indoctrination speech.

I guess that's not saying that it isn't Brohm.

[mraynrand]

Did you notice the thing on her finger? Is that a little donkey (ass)?

[texaspackerbacker]

I submit that you are the equivalent of Buckley and I am the equivalent of /Rush or Hannity. Who does more to help the pro-American cause?

I'll accept that. I hope to write some books that guys like Rush and Hannity will read and deliver to the public in a straightforward manner (particularly on the philosophy of science). But I submit to you that I never hear Hannity or Rush celebrate The death of an American lib like Russert, or joke about an airstrike on the dem convention. That's more in Michael Savage territory. What say you?

I'll give you that. Being so big in the public eye make it necessary for them to choose their words more cautiously i.e. a small touch of p.c. I, on the other hand, do not suffer the same restriction. Thus, I choose honesty.

[texaspackerbacker]

"Worthless politicians" would be the absolute LEAST I would call those assholes.

That’s easy, but what does it accomplish? I think it is much more important to attack the idea.

I happen to think that there is a whole group of people out there that doesn’t really care about the idea, they just don’t ever want to be identified as Conservative….it would not be “cool” (probably not a cool enough word for these folks I admit).

It accomplishes the virtue of HONESTY/TRUTH! Do you have something against honesty/truth?

You talk about winning over moderates. Do you think insulting their intelligence with phoniness and leaving leftist propaganda unchallenged is a better way to win them over?

[HowardRoark]

It accomplishes the virtue of HONESTY/TRUTH! Do you have something against honesty/truth?

You talk about winning over moderates. Do you think insulting their intelligence with phoniness and leaving leftist propaganda unchallenged is a better way to win them over?

I think that this can be accomplished without calling them assholes. And I NEVER leave Leftist propaganda unchallenged.

[HowardRoark]

The Lefty media is already getting their story together. No experience, terrible pick.

Who has more experience? Sarah or Obama?

EDIT: Sorry, wrong room......

[Maxie the Taxi]

I hope to write some books that guys like Rush and Hannity will read and deliver to the public in a straightforward manner (particularly on the philosophy of science).

Post a link when you do.

mraynrand, have you read any Ludwig von Mises?

Yep. I even have a LvM T shirt (no shit, I really do. LOL). Ever Read Stanley Jaki? That shit will blow your mind.

Cool. I've got a LvM Institute T-shirt. I attended one summer longtime ago at Stanford.

No, I haven't read Stanley Jaki, I'll look into it.

I mentioned von Mises because you expressed an interest in writing about the Philosophy of science. The book I most value of von Mises' (and I've read them all) is the least known: THE ULTIMATE FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE. It'll blow your mind.

[texaspackerbacker]

It accomplishes the virtue of HONESTY/TRUTH! Do you have something against honesty/truth?

You talk about winning over moderates. Do you think insulting their intelligence with phoniness and leaving leftist propaganda unchallenged is a better way to win them over?

I think that this can be accomplished without calling them assholes. And I NEVER leave Leftist propaganda unchallenged.

If it's the profanity that bothers you, I'll call them "rectums"--or maybe "ani"--is that the plural of anus?

[HowardRoark]

It accomplishes the virtue of HONESTY/TRUTH! Do you have something against honesty/truth?

You talk about winning over moderates. Do you think insulting their intelligence with phoniness and leaving leftist propaganda unchallenged is a better way to win them over?

I think that this can be accomplished without calling them assholes. And I NEVER leave Leftist propaganda unchallenged.

If it's the profanity that bothers you, I'll call them "rectums"--or maybe "ani"--is that the plural of anus?

OK Tex.

This page is a perfect example of the point I am trying to make. If there is a 24 year old kid with a malleable and curious mind out there reading this thread, which posts are more likely to turn him/her into a Conservative? Yours, or Maxie’s and Rand’s?