Tweet
We can have a meta-discussion on bashing but it extends past just the topic of he-who-can't-be-named and the grouping of principals involved. And that's fine. It's not like that hasn't been done several times with no result. The discussion should not even exist in the Packers forum and I think that if we're going to have the bashing discussion over again within the context of a polarizing figure and an internet crush, the discussion should at least be moved to the RR or the GC.
Last I checked, also, this was a public forum. If you guys wanted to have your private discussion on the morality of bashing there are ways to do so. There are those of us who have had this discussion in the past at length and those of us who have been up all night tending to a fussy baby and wanted to post their feelings without expatiating at length regarding the fact that they feel that:
a.) a case can be made that this discussion should indeed take place in the Favre thread;
b.) the morality and bashing discussion has been had with little effect, much to the frustration of those virtual Spinozans among us and
c.) this one thread starts off with very specific principals in the example and there is an interaction history of said principals. the OP has been at times less than kind to other posters that lack certain anatomical features, going so far as to post and say extremely offensive things about them.
So forgive my purposefully obscure posts but color me skeptical regarding the actual motivations behind this thread.
Last I checked, also, this was a public forum. If you guys wanted to have your private discussion on the morality of bashing there are ways to do so. There are those of us who have had this discussion in the past at length and those of us who have been up all night tending to a fussy baby and wanted to post their feelings without expatiating at length regarding the fact that they feel that:
a.) a case can be made that this discussion should indeed take place in the Favre thread;
b.) the morality and bashing discussion has been had with little effect, much to the frustration of those virtual Spinozans among us and
c.) this one thread starts off with very specific principals in the example and there is an interaction history of said principals. the OP has been at times less than kind to other posters that lack certain anatomical features, going so far as to post and say extremely offensive things about them.
So forgive my purposefully obscure posts but color me skeptical regarding the actual motivations behind this thread.
Comment