Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who says Dems play at demagoguery politics?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by mraynrand
    strict constructionist judges that don't legislate from the bench
    rich


    your platitude list is too much to deal with.

    The social conservative issues ought to be appealing to a lot of blacks and hispanics. But it doesn't seem to be enough.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
      The social conservative issues ought to be appealing to a lot of blacks and hispanics. But it doesn't seem to be enough.
      Gee. I wonder what it could be.
      "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
        Originally posted by mraynrand
        strict constructionist judges that don't legislate from the bench
        rich


        your platitude list is too much to deal with.

        The social conservative issues ought to be appealing to a lot of blacks and hispanics. But it doesn't seem to be enough.
        Funny. To Harlan, less government intrusion is a platitude. Rub the veneer off a 'civil libertarian' and you'll uncover a fascist.
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by SkinBasket
          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
          The social conservative issues ought to be appealing to a lot of blacks and hispanics. But it doesn't seem to be enough.
          Gee. I wonder what it could be.
          no theories? I'd suggest that the Republicans do not fight for the economic interests of working people. And they have a long and deep history of resisting emerging groups: blacks in the 60's, women in the 70's, and now gays and mexicans.
          They'll come around, they always do, but about 20 years late.

          how are Republicans doing with black, women, gay and hispanic voters? not so well, not so well.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by mraynrand
            Funny. To Harlan, less government intrusion is a platitude. Rub the veneer off a 'civil libertarian' and you'll uncover a fascist.
            what else is on your list that I am now against? Was motherhood on there?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              Originally posted by SkinBasket
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              The social conservative issues ought to be appealing to a lot of blacks and hispanics. But it doesn't seem to be enough.
              Gee. I wonder what it could be.
              no theories? I'd suggest that the Republicans do not fight for the economic interests of working people. And they have a long and deep history of resisting emerging groups: blacks in the 60's, women in the 70's, and now gays and mexicans.
              They'll come around, they always do, but about 20 years late.

              how are Republicans doing with black, women, gay and hispanic voters? not so well, not so well.


              Face it, boys. HH's got you whipped.

              The Republicans did ignore blacks until the 60's.

              Republican president Abraham Lincoln did not issue the Emancipation Proclamation until 1863 and push through the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution banning slavery until 1865.

              Comment

              Working...
              X