Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green Bay Packers - What are our members saying?
Collapse
vBulletin 4.0 Publishing Suite with CMS
-
Matthews Greene wired for sound
-
Created by:
KYPack
- Published: 02-12-2011, 08:52 AM
- 0 comments
Matthews Greene wired for sound
(Long post, those with short attention spans, please ignore) I’ve been enjoying the hell out of this SB aftermath. NFL films has come up with their “wired for sound” features called ‘Sound FX’ which really sheds some great insights on the Pack’s fabulous Super victory. Thought I’d present some analysis based on the conversations on the field that I gleaned from these various shows. Firstly, I thought I’d focus on the two defenses. All week all we heard about was of two DC’s... -
Created by:
-
Aaron Rodgers, the most complete Packer QB ever?
-
Created by:
Patler
- Published: 02-09-2011, 06:09 PM
- 0 comments
Aaron Rodgers, the most complete Packer QB ever?
I read this description recently, and thought it was good. I wish I remembered who wrote it, but I don't; so my apologies for not properly crediting it.
The gist of the article was that AR is the best ever for Green Bay because he is:
Bart Starr with a better arm,
Lynn Dickey with better legs.
Brett Favre with a better head.
You know what? It might be true -
Created by:
-
Rodgers and the Championship Belt
-
Created by:
CaptainKickass
- Published: 02-09-2011, 06:03 PM
- 0 comments
Rodgers and the Championship Belt
.
I read a rumor somewhere that either the belt that Clay Matthews III draped over Rodgers shoulder while hoisting the Lombardi trophy... and/or the belt that appeared with Rodgers on Letterman last night... was supplied by none other than the legendary WWE/WWF wrestling icon "Nature Boy" Ric Flair.
This was the closest thing I could find to verification:
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/...ship-belt.html ... -
Created by:
-
We Expect To Win
-
Created by:
VegasPackFan
- Published: 02-09-2011, 05:52 PM
- 0 comments
We Expect To Win
Imagine my friends that you are a fan of almost any other team. You hope for a winning season, you hope for a win against a heated rival (if you have one). The playoffs are a worthy goal, win or lose. If your team just so happens to make it to a conference championship game, then all the better. Super Bowl win? - well at least you made it. Packer fans: Nothing short of an outright Galactic Championship (if it existed) is enough. We dont settle for Division Titles or for Conference Championshi... -
Created by:
-
Two more, just two more.
-
Created by:
Patler
- Published: 02-09-2011, 05:50 PM
- 0 comments
Two more, just two more.
Have been watching some replays.
Rodgers was 24/39 for 304 yards, 3 TDs. Rating of 111.48 Nelson's first drop, for which he stretched more than he had to, went between his elbows and hands. He could/should have caught it in stride for a 51 yard TD, or at worst a 35 yard gain, or so. Jones' drop should have been a 75 yard TD. Just those two plays, if completed would have given Rodgers: 26 of 39 for about 414, 4 TDs if Nelson went to the ground catching it. ... -
Created by:
-
Packers - Steelers -- Superbowl 45
-
Created by:
Sparkey
- Published: 01-24-2011, 12:55 PM
- 0 comments
Packers - Steelers -- Superbowl 45
Opening line is Packers by 2 1/2 points.
Could this be any better of a match up ? Dom Capers vs Dick Le Beau
This is the game I had always hoped for in a Super Bowl. The team with the most Lombardi trophy's against the team with the most Titles. Awesome! -
Created by:
-
Truly Special Teams
-
Created by:
Little Whiskey
- Published: 01-24-2011, 12:49 PM
- 0 comments
Truly Special Teams
for all the crap they took this year. its time they get their own attaboy thread. for all the talk this week about how the bears were going to have the advantage in field position due bears superior special teams. the packers were clearly better in all aspects of special teams yesterday. masthey 5 punts inside the 20 with a long of 65 Hester with only 13 punt return yards on 3 returns. Coverage was great. if i remember right there were 2 or 3 downed inside the 10. (the last touchba... -
Created by:
-
Why no FG's?
-
Created by:
Patler
- Published: 01-24-2011, 12:46 PM
- 0 comments
Why no FG's?
Gould has attempted only 9 FGs of 50+ in six years, and four of them were this year. I suspect most were either in the best of conditions, or situations when there was really no other choice. I have seen the Bears pass up 45-50 yarders in not horrible conditions. Gould does not have a strong leg for FGs, but he is accurate under 45 yards or so. In contrast, Crosby has attempted 21of 50+ in just 4 years. The overall league average for FGs of 50+ has been about 50-55% the last 10 seasons. I... -
Created by:
-
wow. lots of talk about the running games
-
Created by:
pbmax
- Published: 01-22-2011, 12:33 PM
- 0 comments
wow. lots of talk about the running games
Discounting the D's run game numbers is a dangerous game. Now I am all for limiting big pass plays even if it means giving something up in the run D. The improvement in scoring D this year is evidence that this has been worth it. But there is a danger in the tradeoff. Some dope at JSO today subtracted the QB rushing statistics from the Packers Run D and proclaimed them second best in the league. I couldn't find a clear headed individual that mentioned the comparison no longer was meaningful since... -
Created by:
-
How good can Sam Shields become?
-
Created by:
BobDobbs
- Published: 01-22-2011, 12:15 PM
- 0 comments
How good can Sam Shields become?
Sam Shields is absolutely the real deal. After the season he has had he would start for the majority of teams in the NFL. If you're not sold yet you will be soon enough, doubt not. I'm not at all convinced that Underwood or Lee could have held their own. Playing cornerback in the NFL is a hard job where weakness will be exposed (see the Vikings secondary). The fact that he never had a brutal game, and in fact was rarely beaten over an entire season is proof that he is a good cornerback. Furthermore... -
Created by:
There are no articles in this category.
Please log in to your account to view your subscribed posts.
Categories
Collapse
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by JoemailmanIt passed 29-3. Packers were one of 3 teams voting against it.
Kickoffs will remain at the 35-yard line, but the remaining 10 players on the kicking unit will line up at the opposing team's03-26-2024, 11:16 AM -
by FritzWell, this is the year - or so 99% of the fans in Detroit think - that the Lions get a big, meaningful "W" on Thanksgiving Day. Many many talking heads have reminded folks that this is reminiscent of the 1962 Turkey Day game - the 10 - 0 Packers coming in to town - and in that game the Lions' defensive line, lead by Alex Karras, shredded the Packer offensive line, dumping Bart Starr over and over and leading the Leos to a whupping of the Pack. The Lions feature a talented, deep defensive line. Ndama...11-25-2011, 02:28 PM
-
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (Undefeated)
2) 49'ers (2) (Winning % .889 > Saints .700)
Division Winners
3) Saints (4) (Winning % .700 > Giants .667)
4) Giants (3) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Divisional winning % .667 > Bears .500)
6) Bears (6) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
The Rest in Order: 7) Cowboys (8) (Conference Winning % .667 > Falcons .500) 8) Falc...11-15-2011, 09:33 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (5) (Better record than anyone)
2) 49'ers (2) (5-1, Buccaneers + Giants 4-2)
Division Winners
3) Buccaneers (7) (Head to head win over Saints; SOV .333 > Giants .300)
4) Giants (6) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (1) (5-1 > Saints 4-2)
6) Saints (3) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
The Rest in Order:
7) Redskins (4) (3-2 > Bears 3-3)
8) Bears (10)...10-18-2011, 01:36 PM -
Week 5
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Lions (5) (SOV .420 > Packers .400)
2) 49'ers (3) (Conf Winning % .750 > Saints .666)
Division Winners
3) Saints (7) (Winning % .800 > Redskins .750)
4) Redskins (2) (Winning % .750 > Giants .600)
Wild Cards
5) Packers (1) (Winning % 1.00 > Giants .600)
6) Giants (6) (Conf winning % .600 > Buccaneers .500)
The Rest in Order: 7) Buccaneers (4) (...10-11-2011, 12:55 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (SOV .438 > Lions .375; Better record than anyone else)
2) Redskins (6) (SOV .333 > Giants .167; Conf % .750 > 49'ers .667)
Division Winners
3) 49'ers (4) (SOV .333 > Buccaneers .167)
4) Buccaneers (3) (Conference winning % .667 > Saints .500)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Winning % 1.000 > Giants .750)
6) Giants (7) (Conference winning % .750 > Saints .500)
The Rest in Order: 7)...10-04-2011, 10:38 AM
