Originally posted by Sparkey
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL BRETT THE LIVING LEGEND THREAD
Collapse
X
-
No idea, this thread is about Favre and the the vikings, and then people come in here and complain were talking about favre and the vikings.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
I mean, thats the idea of this thread, is it not?
Comment
-
The thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.
Comment
-
While you make a compelling argument here, I would offer that perhaps it's better to see him get oh so close one more time and flame out in grand style in the NFCC--thus leaving him a game short of the "reason he came back" (this time)Originally posted by SparkeyWe all want the Vikings to win the NFC Championship so that they can lose in the Super Bowl.
NOT BECAUSE BF is their QB. But because the only team that should ever have the distinction of LOSING 5 SUPER BOWLS should be the Queens!!
"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
No, the thread is about Bert. Nobody said it was a lovefest. Nobody proclaimed this the official dicksucking Bert thread.Originally posted by packerbacker1234No idea, this thread is about Favre and the the vikings, and then people come in here and complain were talking about favre and the vikings.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
I mean, thats the idea of this thread, is it not?
Nobody is complaining about talking about Bert. People are laughing, complaining, etc..about a stupid post telling them that it is fine now to root for the Vikings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.
Actually the title of the thread is aobut Brett Favre and one could certainly argue it's childish to refer to him by using BertTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Agreed. And, it has been going on for months in this thread. So, why now wonder about childish behavior?Originally posted by BretskyOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.
Actually the title of the thread is aobut Brett Favre and one could certainly argue it's childish to refer to him by using Bert
Quite simply, no freaking packer fan is going to be rooting for the vikes to win the superbowl. At best, one could say that a pack fan should/could root for the NFC over the AFC, but that still leaves plenty of NFC teams to root for before having to cheer for the vikes.
Comment
-
Damn, your good at what you do.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsAgreed. And, it has been going on for months in this thread. So, why now wonder about childish behavior?Originally posted by BretskyOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.
Actually the title of the thread is aobut Brett Favre and one could certainly argue it's childish to refer to him by using Bert
Quite simply, no freaking packer fan is going to be rooting for the vikes to win the superbowl. At best, one could say that a pack fan should/could root for the NFC over the AFC, but that still leaves plenty of NFC teams to root for before having to cheer for the vikes.
Actually I didnt' bring up the childish behavior and I rarely wonder about it although we all witness plenty of it. You brought it up a couple posts above, and it was only after you pointed it out to another poster that I decided to point out another example.
I completely disagree with your last paragraph. I know several diehard Packer fans who will now be rooting for MN now that Green Bay has been eliminated. I know some find it hard to believe that not every Packer fan hates the Vikings and Brett Favre; I've never bought into it.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
SERIOUS question Ty; why do you want bert to be humiliated at all? Forget all the banter, im just curiousOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsHmm, which is more humiliating to Bert. Losing in the Superbowl...putting him the 2x loser category OR flaming out before he can even get to the NFC championship game.Originally posted by SparkeyWe all want the Vikings to win the NFC Championship so that they can lose in the Super Bowl.
NOT BECAUSE BF is their QB. But because the only team that should ever have the distinction of LOSING 5 SUPER BOWLS should be the Queens!!
And I actually think the bert or brent thing is kinda funny. asanine, yet funnyThey said God has a Tim Tebow complex!
Brew Crew in 2011!!!
Comment
-
I'm not Ty, but I'll bite.Originally posted by MOBB DEEPSERIOUS question Ty; why do you want bert to be humiliated at all? Forget all the banter, im just curiousOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsHmm, which is more humiliating to Bert. Losing in the Superbowl...putting him the 2x loser category OR flaming out before he can even get to the NFC championship game.Originally posted by SparkeyWe all want the Vikings to win the NFC Championship so that they can lose in the Super Bowl.
NOT BECAUSE BF is their QB. But because the only team that should ever have the distinction of LOSING 5 SUPER BOWLS should be the Queens!!
I want him to be humiliated because he doesn't seem like a standup guy. He has shown that he is all about himself and has no problem throwing others under the bus. He is a diva and things he is above the system. Anyone who can't see how he gamed and schemed his way out of the Packers and then the Jets is blind. Simply put, the way he acted was wrong. It's the same reason I have no respect for Eli Manning, Michael Vick, Vince Carter, etc.Go PACK
Comment
-
I want the girls to knock the snot out of him because he chose to play for the hated Vikings. If all he wanted to do was 'just play football' he should have stayed in NY for the final year of his contract. But no, he 'retired' yet again, got his release and sauntered over to Minneapolis. I didn't root for the bears a few years ago when they last played in the Super Bowl and I won't root for BF as long as he is wearing that hideous purple getup. :P Comprende?
Comment
-
Um, wrong. The word childish was used by Gex. Ty then responded to that word and used it.Originally posted by BretskyOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsAgreed. And, it has been going on for months in this thread. So, why now wonder about childish behavior?Originally posted by BretskyOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe thread is titled Bert favre.Originally posted by gexWhat the title of this thread again?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBecause you wrote a childish post. Get over yourself and stop bringing up Bert.Originally posted by gexKids these daysOriginally posted by PackerarcherWhy I am flattered,I didn't think anyone had noticed. Get over it people,just because I see without G&G tinted glasses does not make me a troll. I am a realist,and I call them like I see em.Originally posted by JoemailmanGex battling Packerarcher for Troll Of The Year.
I write this,
"Well, now that the conflict of the Packers and Favre both in the playoffs are no longer an issue, everyone should feel free to root for the Packers all time record holder to get himself another ring and finally ride off into the sunset."
And get childish name calling in return
If you can't see that just because the Pack lost that the conflict isn't an issue then you are clueless.
Hint: Bert plays for the vikings. Nobody hear wants to root for the vikings.
Why are you (or anyone for that matter) even opening the Favre thread if you cant stand to read about him?
Does anyone have a logical answer to that?
That doesn't mean you can be childish and not expect to get called on it.
Who said we can't stand to read about him. Who said this thread was supposed to be a positive thread? this thread was about feelings one way or the other about him.
If you want logic, what logic is there in rooting for a vikings QB and team to win a SuperBowl if you are a pack fan.
Actually the title of the thread is aobut Brett Favre and one could certainly argue it's childish to refer to him by using Bert
Quite simply, no freaking packer fan is going to be rooting for the vikes to win the superbowl. At best, one could say that a pack fan should/could root for the NFC over the AFC, but that still leaves plenty of NFC teams to root for before having to cheer for the vikes.
Actually I didnt' bring up the childish behavior and I rarely wonder about it although we all witness plenty of it. You brought it up a couple posts above, and it was only after you pointed it out to another poster that I decided to point out another example.
I completely disagree with your last paragraph. I know several diehard Packer fans who will now be rooting for MN now that Green Bay has been eliminated. I know some find it hard to believe that not every Packer fan hates the Vikings and Brett Favre; I've never bought into it.
Diehard pack fans that are rooting for MN. Um, they aren't diehard pack fans.
Pack fans should hate/detest/loathe/etc. the vikes. How they feel about Favre isn't the issue. He is a viking now.
Ty would suggest you stay away from those "diehard" fans. Bad influence on you and your family.
Comment
-
Ty doesn't care if he is humiliated. A loss is just fine.Originally posted by MOBB DEEPSERIOUS question Ty; why do you want bert to be humiliated at all? Forget all the banter, im just curiousOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsHmm, which is more humiliating to Bert. Losing in the Superbowl...putting him the 2x loser category OR flaming out before he can even get to the NFC championship game.Originally posted by SparkeyWe all want the Vikings to win the NFC Championship so that they can lose in the Super Bowl.
NOT BECAUSE BF is their QB. But because the only team that should ever have the distinction of LOSING 5 SUPER BOWLS should be the Queens!!
And I actually think the bert or brent thing is kinda funny. asanine, yet funny
Ty wants him to lose for the same reason others want to see him win.
Comment
-
I think it would be poetic justice if the NYJ make it to the SuperBowl and win!Originally posted by PuggerI want the girls to knock the snot out of him because he chose to play for the hated Vikings. If all he wanted to do was 'just play football' he should have stayed in NY for the final year of his contract. But no, he 'retired' yet again, got his release and sauntered over to Minneapolis. I didn't root for the bears a few years ago when they last played in the Super Bowl and I won't root for BF as long as he is wearing that hideous purple getup. :P Comprende?But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment


Comment