The way I interpret the Rodgers pick is TT took the BPA.
Suggesting a different player would have made the 2005 Packers a SB contender is ludicrous. One player will not vastly improve what turned out to be a 4-12 team.
Favre was definitely not commited to playing under a TT led front office. Sherman would have pouted whomever TT picked; he'd recently been stripped of the GM duties.
The Packers under Sherman/Favre were only close in the 4th & 26 season and both Sherman and Favre botched big time against Phillie. I believe the term "choked" is appropriate.
I highly doubt Rodgers would have faired any better than #1 overall, Alex Smith, had he been thrust into play as a rookie. His first two pre-seasons were anything but encouraging to Packer fans and probably coaching.
The Packers got lucky in that Favre played three more seasons to allow Rodgers to ripen and mature. M3 had ample time to prepare for the post Favre era and, the results have proven that the time was spent wisely.
I don't consider TT a genious for picking Rodgers, nor do I consider him woeful for picking Harrell or Hawk. I admire him for sticking to his BPA philosophie.
What I admire him more for is his ballsy stance vis a vis Bert. He rightly refused to be held hostage again. He relied obviously heavily on the coaching staff.
Favre has no one but himself and probably Bus Cooke to blame for his image demise. He should have been second string to the Almighty in Packerland. Instead he has become the most polarizing figure in the history of the game.
Great legacy.
Suggesting a different player would have made the 2005 Packers a SB contender is ludicrous. One player will not vastly improve what turned out to be a 4-12 team.
Favre was definitely not commited to playing under a TT led front office. Sherman would have pouted whomever TT picked; he'd recently been stripped of the GM duties.
The Packers under Sherman/Favre were only close in the 4th & 26 season and both Sherman and Favre botched big time against Phillie. I believe the term "choked" is appropriate.
I highly doubt Rodgers would have faired any better than #1 overall, Alex Smith, had he been thrust into play as a rookie. His first two pre-seasons were anything but encouraging to Packer fans and probably coaching.
The Packers got lucky in that Favre played three more seasons to allow Rodgers to ripen and mature. M3 had ample time to prepare for the post Favre era and, the results have proven that the time was spent wisely.
I don't consider TT a genious for picking Rodgers, nor do I consider him woeful for picking Harrell or Hawk. I admire him for sticking to his BPA philosophie.
What I admire him more for is his ballsy stance vis a vis Bert. He rightly refused to be held hostage again. He relied obviously heavily on the coaching staff.
Favre has no one but himself and probably Bus Cooke to blame for his image demise. He should have been second string to the Almighty in Packerland. Instead he has become the most polarizing figure in the history of the game.
Great legacy.


Comment