NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND

[Harlan Huckleby]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

so what do you have against feminine hygiene? Douching is a good thing, I agree that cpk is a breath of fresh air.

[cpk1994]

Re: NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND

This is why you don't trade Favre. Rodgers goes down and the Pack is screwed.

TT should have brought in a vet backup.

Why did you not create a thread "NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND" after Rodgers had good games? Aren't the lessons there equally valid.

This is loser stuff.

Becuae he is one that has been raking TT over the coasls for Favre and now the gutless wonder has come to gloat. Kind of funny he was nowhere to be found when ARod was doing well. Until they do, these idiots have no credibility.

DUDE. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FACTS:

A-Rod had a decent game against the Vikes. One passing TD, and one rushing TD. Not exactly a day of offensive fire power.

He started out hot against Detroit. Detroit. One more time. Detroit. Then, the offense stalled so bad Detroit took the lead with 5 minutes left. Had it not been for Chuck, we would have LOST and been the joke of the league for giving up a huge lead to Detroit. Sure, statistically it was a fine outting, but stats don't tell the whole story when the team starts out hots then cools down to ice.

Against Dallas he played pretty bad imo. He didn't lose the game but he certainly didn't do anything to make it close.

Today he was awful. Say what you will, but I'm a realist. He's been OK so far after a dynamic preseason.

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about LEWCWA and his ilk who were mysteriously missing when ARod was doing well but suddenly show up and bash when ARod has struggled. If you don't have the guts to come on when ARod is doing well and say so, you have no right to bash him when he struggles.

show me where I bashed arod......I think he is good, I think Favre is better.

Lewcwa... you are not alone my friend...


i've been here the entire time, talked good about arod when he did well but anytime you say a bad thing about him... ur a troll! haha it makes zero sense...

. You have even admitting you are a troll. There is a difference between critiquing ARods performance, which is fine, and blatant trolling like the pathetic little weasel you are. You want me to pull up all your cheap shots and gloating?

[cpk1994]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

[Pacopete4]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

i dunno about ur but id rather be a dick head...

[Scott Campbell]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

I thought I was the dick head. Or was that Harlan?

[Pacopete4]

Re: NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND

This is why you don't trade Favre. Rodgers goes down and the Pack is screwed.

TT should have brought in a vet backup.

Why did you not create a thread "NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND" after Rodgers had good games? Aren't the lessons there equally valid.

This is loser stuff.

Becuae he is one that has been raking TT over the coasls for Favre and now the gutless wonder has come to gloat. Kind of funny he was nowhere to be found when ARod was doing well. Until they do, these idiots have no credibility.

DUDE. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FACTS:

A-Rod had a decent game against the Vikes. One passing TD, and one rushing TD. Not exactly a day of offensive fire power.

He started out hot against Detroit. Detroit. One more time. Detroit. Then, the offense stalled so bad Detroit took the lead with 5 minutes left. Had it not been for Chuck, we would have LOST and been the joke of the league for giving up a huge lead to Detroit. Sure, statistically it was a fine outting, but stats don't tell the whole story when the team starts out hots then cools down to ice.

Against Dallas he played pretty bad imo. He didn't lose the game but he certainly didn't do anything to make it close.

Today he was awful. Say what you will, but I'm a realist. He's been OK so far after a dynamic preseason.

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about LEWCWA and his ilk who were mysteriously missing when ARod was doing well but suddenly show up and bash when ARod has struggled. If you don't have the guts to come on when ARod is doing well and say so, you have no right to bash him when he struggles.

show me where I bashed arod......I think he is good, I think Favre is better.

Lewcwa... you are not alone my friend...


i've been here the entire time, talked good about arod when he did well but anytime you say a bad thing about him... ur a troll! haha it makes zero sense...

. You have even admitting you are a troll. There is a difference between critiquing ARods performance, which is fine, and blatant trolling like the pathetic little weasel you are. You want me to pull up all your cheap shots and gloating?

I would love for u to pull up things I said wrong about Arod... love for it

I am no troll, I am a packer fan that supports each and every player on that team....

I am also a fan that does not just say oh whatever TT does is great, we're gonna be awesome, and have my head in the clouds...

we made a big mistake, favre is better... he will always be better... even when Arod is in his prime... if he ever gets there(that is no shot, its reality with that kid).... favre will most likely be still better at 39... its that simple, really...

[Pacopete4]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

I thought I was the dick head. Or was that Harlan?

no, you were a jock sniffer

[cpk1994]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

I thought I was the dick head. Or was that Harlan?

No, Pete is the dickhead. You are a good guy. I can actually debate with you becuase don't lack IQ like Pete does.

[Pacopete4]

cpk is a douche.. hands down

ANd you're a dick head.

I thought I was the dick head. Or was that Harlan?

No, Pete is the dickhead. You are a good guy. I can actually debate with you becuase don't lack IQ like Pete does.

debate me cpk... please... i really want to hear anything u have to say about favre/rodgers....

[Scott Campbell]

It's like this every year. We lose a game or two, and the Chicken Littles start wetting the bed.

[cpk1994]

Re: NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND

This is why you don't trade Favre. Rodgers goes down and the Pack is screwed.

TT should have brought in a vet backup.

Why did you not create a thread "NOW WE SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND" after Rodgers had good games? Aren't the lessons there equally valid.

This is loser stuff.

Becuae he is one that has been raking TT over the coasls for Favre and now the gutless wonder has come to gloat. Kind of funny he was nowhere to be found when ARod was doing well. Until they do, these idiots have no credibility.

DUDE. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FACTS:

A-Rod had a decent game against the Vikes. One passing TD, and one rushing TD. Not exactly a day of offensive fire power.

He started out hot against Detroit. Detroit. One more time. Detroit. Then, the offense stalled so bad Detroit took the lead with 5 minutes left. Had it not been for Chuck, we would have LOST and been the joke of the league for giving up a huge lead to Detroit. Sure, statistically it was a fine outting, but stats don't tell the whole story when the team starts out hots then cools down to ice.

Against Dallas he played pretty bad imo. He didn't lose the game but he certainly didn't do anything to make it close.

Today he was awful. Say what you will, but I'm a realist. He's been OK so far after a dynamic preseason.

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about LEWCWA and his ilk who were mysteriously missing when ARod was doing well but suddenly show up and bash when ARod has struggled. If you don't have the guts to come on when ARod is doing well and say so, you have no right to bash him when he struggles.

show me where I bashed arod......I think he is good, I think Favre is better.

Lewcwa... you are not alone my friend...


i've been here the entire time, talked good about arod when he did well but anytime you say a bad thing about him... ur a troll! haha it makes zero sense...

. You have even admitting you are a troll. There is a difference between critiquing ARods performance, which is fine, and blatant trolling like the pathetic little weasel you are. You want me to pull up all your cheap shots and gloating?

I would love for u to pull up things I said wrong about Arod... love for it

I am no troll, I am a packer fan that supports each and every player on that team....

I am also a fan that does not just say oh whatever TT does is great, we're gonna be awesome, and have my head in the clouds...

we made a big mistake, favre is better... he will always be better... even when Arod is in his prime... if he ever gets there(that is no shot, its reality with that kid).... favre will most likely be still better at 39... its that simple, really...

Who the fuck cares if Brett is still better? HE IS GONE! GET THE FUCK OVER IT! When ARod leads this team to a SB, does it matter if Brett is still better? NO! Why? Becuase Arod lead us to the damn SB. HOw about supporting the team instead of comparing every little thing ARod does to Brett, which makes you hypocritical becuase you were the one bitching and moaning about others doing the exact same thing you are doing now! Let Arod run the team and keep Brett the hell out of it.

[Pacopete4]

It's like this every year. We lose a game or two, and the Chicken Littles start wetting the bed.

my thing is, i dont think the sky is falling... this is where i figured this team would be at anyways... a qb away from being a SB contender this season

[th87]

Re: Favre

But let's remember there were a few of us who saw it coming. There were a few of us who said Favre carried this team and that without him things would change. A few of us knew it was Favre and not McCarthy's scheme that led to a great season.

And there were also a few of us who realized just how damn close we were and what we needed to take the next step. Thompson should have been on Favre's door a week after the season ended with a plan to fix our run game problems that NY exploited. There should have been some money commited to at least one of the big name o-lineman that were out there.

1. It was a team effort last year. Favre was simply a big cog in the machine. TT thought replacing the big cog (which only has a year left before it needs replacing) with a slightly smaller cog (which could have years of solid functionality and could grow) would be the more prudent decision. Last year, the line showed up. This year, it hasn't. That's big.

2. We weren't "damn close" last year. We were there. Everything was ours for the taking, but we blew it. Why didn't the run game work? The Giants put 8 in the box on every play. Watch it again. They basically dared Favre to beat them one on one, and he was too inaccurate to do it. Favre (and Harris) lost us that game.

[mission]

It's like this every year. We lose a game or two, and the Chicken Littles start wetting the bed.

my thing is, i dont think the sky is falling... this is where i figured this team would be at anyways... a qb away from being a SB contender this season

so you're wrong then.

because this is hardly a team one QB away from being a SB contender. It takes a lot more than a QB -- it starts on the LOS -- and goes from there.

injuries are definitely not helping us and penalties ... wow... ive never remembered them this bad.

[packerbacker1234]

The Favre trolls are out, and their nipples are hard.

why are we trolls when we were right about the situation.. the packers front office can be wrong in situations and as fans we have that right to be pissed off about it... today was a great telling sign of the difference between what we had and what we have.... and that just fuckin sucks IMO

What I love is the management trolls "guys, the management can't be wrong because this is what they are payed to do!".

I'll always give credit the management knows more about things football related then any fan, but it doesn't mean they are infallible to making mistakes. Letting Favre go is starting to look like a mistake if they wanted to win this year. It's not about seeing what you have in Rodgers - if this is the case with players why don't we just cut Woodson and Harris to see what we have Pat Lee and Tramon Williams as a tandum? Jeese, why didn't the Giants just cut Strahan since he was pretty much "retired" until a week before the season last year?

(to note, Favre retiring, then saying he wants to play a full month before training camp, is a much better situation then having a star player say he doesn't know if he wants to retire or not... and not making a decision until a week before the season starts.)

I don't know if our record would be any better with favre, but one has to assume the offense would be playing much better.

Oh, and I do apologize on my minnesota comments, he did indeed have 2 td's. However, I still stand by my "he didn't win the game". Guess what, Favre didn't win the lastgame for the jets either. Winning to game is when your down late and have to put the team on your back to get the win.

Rodgers hasn't done that yet,a nd he's had three games over the last two seasons in which we needed him to do so.