Breaking News on Brett Favre!

[Merlin]

It's all about revenge and a bitter man that can't let go. The love affair died and he can't get over it and can't let it go.

I'm going with what we all should know about Brett Favre and that's his love for the game and to compete.

To take it to: It's personal or he has something to prove is dark, as mean and prickly as the personalitys of those that post such garbage. I came to know him as a Packer fan and remain loyal to him as the football player he endeavours to be. To respect his style, spirit and play and for all he wants still hopefully to give to the game.

Favre in a Vikings uniform certainly is intriguiging. I would use different adjectives to describe the hatred he gets on this forum from some nobs that don't have the brains to blow powder to hell. Yes! That's you as it fits.

A suggestion Packerrats:

Let go of the man and lets just see what transpires. It's a free world gents but can we be free of ridicule and ignorance here? I suspect that will challenge the small minded among us.

Nice post Woody...

[Merlin]

Favre is starting to piss me off:


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Looks like Paco has already commented on the article.

Last year, when Favre applied for reinstatement from retirement, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell -- who was responsible for the reinstatement -- saw the potential for a sour scene at Packers training camp and decided to reach out to Favre by phone.

According to sources, Favre explained to Goodell that he had no choice but to ask the Packers to come back in order to force his release if they wouldn't let him compete with Aaron Rodgers for the starting job in Green Bay.

Favre's intention was to be released and join the Minnesota Vikings, the Packers' NFC North rivals.

At one point, according to the source, Favre got passionate on the phone, telling Goodell, "He (Thompson) doesn't want me going to Minnesota because he knows I'll kick his ass twice a year!"

That makes it mere hearsay. Mere hearsay at a time of high emotion for Favre even if he went there. If he went there? Favre like all here is a mere human being and things this time last season were highly charged.

Again, Favre is human.

What can I say? The conspiracy theorists can argue all they want and do revisionist history all they want but facts are facts.
1) TT did not kiss Brett's butt and sign a horde of FAs while Brett was here but that was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Thats just how TT operates. He is no more urgent to sign FAs with Rodgers as QB than he was with Brett. Is he now trying to run Rodgers out of town?

2)The decision to draft Rodgers was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Rodgers was the best player on the board. Brett was 36. Brett had been waffling for a couple years already about retirement. The Packers had no quality backup QB let alone an heir apparant if Brett were to leave. And Rodgers just fell to them. And remember Brett kept the job for 3 years after Rodgers arrived and would have kept it in 2008 had Brett not retired.

3) Brett did in fact retire on his own after the 2007 season. Could the Packers have welcomed him back? Sure. Can people be mad that they did not welcome him back? Of course. But lets not change the procuring cause of the problem which is that Brett decided to "hang em up".

Brett was not forced out. Brett was not run off. Brett was not cut or traded until he himself made the first move by retiring. Folks can argue all you want that the Packers were wrong in trading him or not giving his starting job back or whatever but you cannot change the fact than Brett retired for the entire 2008 offseason and then wanted to come back when camp opened and the Packers said "we've moved on." Brett brought this on himself. Now he is invigorated to "stick it" to Green Bay and TT. That is just how it is. No spinning will change those basic facts

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

[Pacopete4]

Favre is starting to piss me off:


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Looks like Paco has already commented on the article.

Last year, when Favre applied for reinstatement from retirement, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell -- who was responsible for the reinstatement -- saw the potential for a sour scene at Packers training camp and decided to reach out to Favre by phone.

According to sources, Favre explained to Goodell that he had no choice but to ask the Packers to come back in order to force his release if they wouldn't let him compete with Aaron Rodgers for the starting job in Green Bay.

Favre's intention was to be released and join the Minnesota Vikings, the Packers' NFC North rivals.

At one point, according to the source, Favre got passionate on the phone, telling Goodell, "He (Thompson) doesn't want me going to Minnesota because he knows I'll kick his ass twice a year!"

That makes it mere hearsay. Mere hearsay at a time of high emotion for Favre even if he went there. If he went there? Favre like all here is a mere human being and things this time last season were highly charged.

Again, Favre is human.

What can I say? The conspiracy theorists can argue all they want and do revisionist history all they want but facts are facts.
1) TT did not kiss Brett's butt and sign a horde of FAs while Brett was here but that was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Thats just how TT operates. He is no more urgent to sign FAs with Rodgers as QB than he was with Brett. Is he now trying to run Rodgers out of town?

2)The decision to draft Rodgers was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Rodgers was the best player on the board. Brett was 36. Brett had been waffling for a couple years already about retirement. The Packers had no quality backup QB let alone an heir apparant if Brett were to leave. And Rodgers just fell to them. And remember Brett kept the job for 3 years after Rodgers arrived and would have kept it in 2008 had Brett not retired.

3) Brett did in fact retire on his own after the 2007 season. Could the Packers have welcomed him back? Sure. Can people be mad that they did not welcome him back? Of course. But lets not change the procuring cause of the problem which is that Brett decided to "hang em up".

Brett was not forced out. Brett was not run off. Brett was not cut or traded until he himself made the first move by retiring. Folks can argue all you want that the Packers were wrong in trading him or not giving his starting job back or whatever but you cannot change the fact than Brett retired for the entire 2008 offseason and then wanted to come back when camp opened and the Packers said "we've moved on." Brett brought this on himself. Now he is invigorated to "stick it" to Green Bay and TT. That is just how it is. No spinning will change those basic facts

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

[Chevelle2]

Favre is starting to piss me off:


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Looks like Paco has already commented on the article.

Last year, when Favre applied for reinstatement from retirement, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell -- who was responsible for the reinstatement -- saw the potential for a sour scene at Packers training camp and decided to reach out to Favre by phone.

According to sources, Favre explained to Goodell that he had no choice but to ask the Packers to come back in order to force his release if they wouldn't let him compete with Aaron Rodgers for the starting job in Green Bay.

Favre's intention was to be released and join the Minnesota Vikings, the Packers' NFC North rivals.

At one point, according to the source, Favre got passionate on the phone, telling Goodell, "He (Thompson) doesn't want me going to Minnesota because he knows I'll kick his ass twice a year!"

That makes it mere hearsay. Mere hearsay at a time of high emotion for Favre even if he went there. If he went there? Favre like all here is a mere human being and things this time last season were highly charged.

Again, Favre is human.

What can I say? The conspiracy theorists can argue all they want and do revisionist history all they want but facts are facts.
1) TT did not kiss Brett's butt and sign a horde of FAs while Brett was here but that was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Thats just how TT operates. He is no more urgent to sign FAs with Rodgers as QB than he was with Brett. Is he now trying to run Rodgers out of town?

2)The decision to draft Rodgers was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Rodgers was the best player on the board. Brett was 36. Brett had been waffling for a couple years already about retirement. The Packers had no quality backup QB let alone an heir apparant if Brett were to leave. And Rodgers just fell to them. And remember Brett kept the job for 3 years after Rodgers arrived and would have kept it in 2008 had Brett not retired.

3) Brett did in fact retire on his own after the 2007 season. Could the Packers have welcomed him back? Sure. Can people be mad that they did not welcome him back? Of course. But lets not change the procuring cause of the problem which is that Brett decided to "hang em up".

Brett was not forced out. Brett was not run off. Brett was not cut or traded until he himself made the first move by retiring. Folks can argue all you want that the Packers were wrong in trading him or not giving his starting job back or whatever but you cannot change the fact than Brett retired for the entire 2008 offseason and then wanted to come back when camp opened and the Packers said "we've moved on." Brett brought this on himself. Now he is invigorated to "stick it" to Green Bay and TT. That is just how it is. No spinning will change those basic facts

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

You had me until "least successful GM." Go be a Jets fan, or a Viking fan. Or whichever team your mancrush is going to play for next.

[Bossman641]

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

Favre apologists always throw this line out there and it makes no sense to me. Has Favre shown anywhere that he didn't pull out all the guns to try and make TT and the organization look bad? No, from his comments last summer and the whispers we have heard since then Favre came with everything he had. Maybe Favre wasn't wronged as much as some of you would wish.

All summer we kept waiting for the bombshell to drop of how TT had screwed Favre over and that's why he was so upset and acting the way he was. Guess what, it never came. You expect me to believe that Favre; who went on Greta, let his family do his talking for him, threw Campen under the bus, badmouthed TT and the organization, was bitching about the Packers all year (according to Jets players), etc..... has some deep, dark secret about the Packers that he is too moral to reveal? Get real.

The Packers stuck to their guns of remaning fairly silent except to correct events in the Favre timeline. Favre stuck to his guns of playing the media game and letting others do the talking for him. Sorry, but when it comes down to who I believe more there's no question it's the organization.

If you have any proof or even theories of why Favre didn't come out with the whole truth I'd love to hear them.

[RashanGary]

Look what Jets players have had to say about Favre. If he didn't have a legacy (money) being protected in GB, you wonder what you would hear out of our lockerroom.


As far as there being two sides, yeah there are two.

One side has lied over and over.

One side has laid out a detailed timetable and has never been shown to be a liar in the course of his entire life. In fact, by those who know Thompson, he is one of the most honest, good persons they have met.

You can choose to believe whoever you want, but many here would call believing a compulsive liar over a stand up man, idiotic. So if there is a general sense that Favre is a liar and Thompson is a good man, don't be shocked. That is a big part of what has been revealed in this whole drama. Thompsons approval rating seems to be at an all time high. Favre's seems to be at an all time low. I think it is what it is and people see it.

If that bothers you, good. Sometimes the truth bothers us but it doesn't mean we should stop telling it.

[cpk1994]

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

Favre apologists always throw this line out there and it makes no sense to me. Has Favre shown anywhere that he didn't pull out all the guns to try and make TT and the organization look bad? No, from his comments last summer and the whispers we have heard since then Favre came with everything he had. Maybe Favre wasn't wronged as much as some of you would wish.

All summer we kept waiting for the bombshell to drop of how TT had screwed Favre over and that's why he was so upset and acting the way he was. Guess what, it never came. You expect me to believe that Favre; who went on Greta, let his family do his talking for him, threw Campen under the bus, badmouthed TT and the organization, was bitching about the Packers all year (according to Jets players), etc..... has some deep, dark secret about the Packers that he is too moral to reveal? Get real.

The Packers stuck to their guns of remaning fairly silent except to correct events in the Favre timeline. Favre stuck to his guns of playing the media game and letting others do the talking for him. Sorry, but when it comes down to who I believe more there's no question it's the organization.

If you have any proof or even theories of why Favre didn't come out with the whole truth I'd love to hear them.

Well said. And thats even without the all out hachet job done on the Packers by BSPN(most notably Gene W. John Clayton, and Mort) and MJS. ESPN didn't even bother to tell the Packers saide of the story. None of their main NFL guys did. It was always "Poor Favre. What a sad victim". Disgusting.

[Pack-man]

Favre reportedly to have arm surgery this week
Retired QB will have biceps tendon repaired; rehab to take 6-8 weeks

NBCSports.com news services
updated 35 minutes ago

Brett Favre will meet with Dr. James Andrews on Tuesday to discuss surgery on his torn right biceps tendon, the St. Paul Pioneer-Press reported Monday, citing no sources.

Favre is expected to undergo the surgery this week and would begin a 6-8 week rehab, the newspaper reported.

If all goes well with the surgery, Favre is expected to sign with the Vikings, the newspaper reported.

[Merlin]

Favre is starting to piss me off:


http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...s&confirm=true

Looks like Paco has already commented on the article.

Last year, when Favre applied for reinstatement from retirement, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell -- who was responsible for the reinstatement -- saw the potential for a sour scene at Packers training camp and decided to reach out to Favre by phone.

According to sources, Favre explained to Goodell that he had no choice but to ask the Packers to come back in order to force his release if they wouldn't let him compete with Aaron Rodgers for the starting job in Green Bay.

Favre's intention was to be released and join the Minnesota Vikings, the Packers' NFC North rivals.

At one point, according to the source, Favre got passionate on the phone, telling Goodell, "He (Thompson) doesn't want me going to Minnesota because he knows I'll kick his ass twice a year!"

That makes it mere hearsay. Mere hearsay at a time of high emotion for Favre even if he went there. If he went there? Favre like all here is a mere human being and things this time last season were highly charged.

Again, Favre is human.

What can I say? The conspiracy theorists can argue all they want and do revisionist history all they want but facts are facts.
1) TT did not kiss Brett's butt and sign a horde of FAs while Brett was here but that was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Thats just how TT operates. He is no more urgent to sign FAs with Rodgers as QB than he was with Brett. Is he now trying to run Rodgers out of town?

2)The decision to draft Rodgers was not an attempt to run Brett out of town. Rodgers was the best player on the board. Brett was 36. Brett had been waffling for a couple years already about retirement. The Packers had no quality backup QB let alone an heir apparant if Brett were to leave. And Rodgers just fell to them. And remember Brett kept the job for 3 years after Rodgers arrived and would have kept it in 2008 had Brett not retired.

3) Brett did in fact retire on his own after the 2007 season. Could the Packers have welcomed him back? Sure. Can people be mad that they did not welcome him back? Of course. But lets not change the procuring cause of the problem which is that Brett decided to "hang em up".

Brett was not forced out. Brett was not run off. Brett was not cut or traded until he himself made the first move by retiring. Folks can argue all you want that the Packers were wrong in trading him or not giving his starting job back or whatever but you cannot change the fact than Brett retired for the entire 2008 offseason and then wanted to come back when camp opened and the Packers said "we've moved on." Brett brought this on himself. Now he is invigorated to "stick it" to Green Bay and TT. That is just how it is. No spinning will change those basic facts

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

You had me until "least successful GM." Go be a Jets fan, or a Viking fan. Or whichever team your mancrush is going to play for next.

You must rate success differently then I do. I look at the W's, playoff appearances, etc. and in that regard, he is, it's a fact, it cannot be disputed.

I am a fan of the game and Favre is fun to watch, no matter who he plays for. I thoroughly enjoyed watching him in the AFC last season. This season, if he plays for the Vikings, I won't get as much enjoyment because I am first an foremost a Packer fan and I of course want the Vikings to lose, especially twice to the Packers. That doesn't mean Favre has to play crappy for that to happen, that doesn't mean he still won't be enjoyable to watch. I also will see less football this season because Favre being in the AFC allowed for more games to watch, the Vikings, in our own division, I won't see many of those games unless the Packers aren't playing, and I watched those already anyway, as I did for a NFC North teams that weren't playing when the Packers were.

[Chevelle2]

Well, go get 'em boys!

[Merlin]

There are two sides to this story and you have only provided one, your own take on it. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and no one accept Favre and Thompson can clarify what really happened, they each have stuck to their guns so by taking Thompson's side you are calling Favre a liar, by taking Favre's side you are calling Thompson a liar, by just accepting that you don't know what you don't know, you are being intelligent about the matter which is right where any rational person should be. Favre was and perhaps still is a great player to watch play the game. Just because you follow his career doesn't make you a "hater" of anyone, it just shows your love of the game, contrary to what MANY posters in here believe. If you follow the career of Adrian Paterson, are you a hater? What about Joe Montana? Are you a hater? Why is Favre any different? I don't hear anyone blowing their wad about Ryan Longwell anymore, or hell even Darren Sharper. Why is Favre different? I suspect your disdain for him is why you have an a loyalty for the least successful GM we have had in 20 some years. The facts as you put it are there, look it up, Thompson is NOT a successful GM. "We like who we have here", apparently the record doesn't matter as long as you like your own decisions...

Favre apologists always throw this line out there and it makes no sense to me. Has Favre shown anywhere that he didn't pull out all the guns to try and make TT and the organization look bad? No, from his comments last summer and the whispers we have heard since then Favre came with everything he had. Maybe Favre wasn't wronged as much as some of you would wish.

All summer we kept waiting for the bombshell to drop of how TT had screwed Favre over and that's why he was so upset and acting the way he was. Guess what, it never came. You expect me to believe that Favre; who went on Greta, let his family do his talking for him, threw Campen under the bus, badmouthed TT and the organization, was bitching about the Packers all year (according to Jets players), etc..... has some deep, dark secret about the Packers that he is too moral to reveal? Get real.

The Packers stuck to their guns of remaning fairly silent except to correct events in the Favre timeline. Favre stuck to his guns of playing the media game and letting others do the talking for him. Sorry, but when it comes down to who I believe more there's no question it's the organization.

If you have any proof or even theories of why Favre didn't come out with the whole truth I'd love to hear them.

Sure, if you have any proof or even theories of why Thompson & McCarthy didn't come out with the whole truth I'd love to hear them. That argument in and of itself doesn't have any creditability. Thompson & McCarthy both aren't stupid enough to say what "really" transpired, especially if anything Favre said was true. You are taking a side when neither you nor any of the rest of us have any idea what really happened. Favre had no choice but to attack to save face because of what I believe was a stupid decision to retire and Thompson & McCarthy had no choice but to deny given their respective positions in the organization. Somewhere in the middle is the truth and there was much more going on than what Thompson & McCarthy told the media, Favre probably did embellish/lie about some of it, but it ALL wasn't a lie. Just like Thompson & McCarthy denying it ALL doesn't mean there isn't some truth to some of it. You have taken a side and refuse to acknowledge any opinion other then your own and it's your choice to do so. However, conventional wisdom would say that when you have two sides of a story, both sides will be biased in each sides favor with the truth lying somewhere in the middle. I guess Thompson & McCarthy have no reason to lie, only Favre does, and you think I am an apologist?

I deplore you to look up the word "Hypocrisy"...

[RashanGary]

Favre is a shown liar through all of this and a total phony per the Jet's teammates

McCarthy and Thompson are shown honest men through all of this.



Believe who you want just don't whine about it when the majority think you're an idiot.

[swede]

I deplore you to look up the word "Hypocrisy"...

I deplore you to look up the word "deplore".

[retailguy]

Favre is a shown liar.

McCarthy and Thompson are shown honest men.



Believe who you want.

This is a riot.

Thompson - "We are not rebuilding".

McCarthy - "I'm just putting a coat of paint on my dream house".

Yep. Justin, sometimes you kill me.






DISCLAIMER - None of the above is meant to convey my allegiance for, nor my support for, the idiotic positions taken by my teams former, future HOF quarterback. Though, his whining, sniveling display, does not make Thomspon, McCarthy nor the Packer organization more "honest". LMAO.

[Chevelle2]

Favre is a shown liar.

McCarthy and Thompson are shown honest men.



Believe who you want.

This is a riot.

Thompson - "We are not rebuilding".

McCarthy - "I'm just putting a coat of paint on my dream house".

Yep. Justin, sometimes you kill me.






DISCLAIMER - None of the above is meant to convey my allegiance for, nor my support for, the idiotic positions taken by my teams former, future HOF quarterback. Though, his whining, sniveling display, does not make Thomspon, McCarthy nor the Packer organization more "honest". LMAO.

Brett Favre: "I wont come back, even if I get the itch"

"Its all rumor"

"No Deanna, Im not addicted to pain pills"

etc etc