Favre Deal Done?

[DannoMac21]

This truly is a Favre masturbation fest. Now which one of these Favre lovers is secretly John Madden?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'm sure most of your wives change their minds about shit on a daily basis and you still keep her around!

If my girl wanted to bang another producer who I have to work with a couple times a year I'd have a pretty big problem with that ... not insecure, just, you know ...

You gonna let a girl come tween you and the bucks? For shame.

[cpk1994]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

[SkinBasket]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

Maybe if you had called Favre a cunt, you could have just gotten away with not apologizing.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

Maybe if you had called Favre a cunt, you could have just gotten away with not apologizing.

Ziggy noticeable absent lately.

[Bretsky]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

different standards ? What a load of crap. How would you know what an admin is PM'ing people ? Silly to generalize like this with limited knowledge.

You are still around and you've shown plenty of disrespect over time toward other posters.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

different standards ? What a load of crap. How would you know what an admin is PM'ing people ? Silly to generalize like this with limited knowledge.

You are still around and you've shown plenty of disrespect over time toward other posters.

Did you read the thread? From your post, it doesn't appear so.

[Rastak]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

I think it's more based on his impression of a poster being a one trick pony.


Same opinion on same subject interjected into every fucking post.....over and over and over. I will rip this guy, I will rip this poster....rinse and repeat.

Just my guess.

[Bretsky]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

different standards ? What a load of crap. How would you know what an admin is PM'ing people ? Silly to generalize like this with limited knowledge.

You are still around and you've shown plenty of disrespect over time toward other posters.

Did you read the thread? From your post, it doesn't appear so.

Yes, I read it

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Looks like it's open season on cpk. Better strap one on brah.

I can deal with it, if the admin would just be honest and admit that he has different standards for different posters based on wether he likes you or not.

different standards ? What a load of crap. How would you know what an admin is PM'ing people ? Silly to generalize like this with limited knowledge.

You are still around and you've shown plenty of disrespect over time toward other posters.

Did you read the thread? From your post, it doesn't appear so.

Yes, I read it

And, u don't find Snake's post pretty darn personal...and nothing from the admin...just...good post?

Look, Cpk may be a one trick pony...but, the post was personal.

Pretty hard for some of us not to see selective enforcement...especially after posters were banned...and partial called someone a cunt..and didn't suffer one bit for it.

[Rastak]

Body of work is my guess......body of work. Same shit over and over equals kick square in ass.

[bobblehead]

blah, blah, blah is all I hear. The point wasn't to compare Favre with anyone, just to show most all QB's with several playoff runs have comparable numbers to Brett. I just don't get all the bashing. big damn deal, he threw a bunch of picks against the Rams. They were a much better team and he knew they had to score to keep up with that team, as I recall most of those picks came trying to make up a big deficit.....and christ get off this traitor crap already. I'm sure most of your wives change their minds about shit on a daily basis and you still keep her around!

I always get riled up about that Rams game because 3 INTs came after the game was over - the Pack down by at least three scores with about a quarter left. And depending on Schroeder, Favre was responsible for 1 or 2 of the first 3. Favre actually played quite well in that game - the run blocking was for shit, the pass pro not much better, and other guys (Freeman and Schroeder) made mistakes. Stats in football are always troublesome, as are the attempts to determine whether Favre made the receivers better or vice versa. And people routinely forget things like the fact that in 2002 the Packers were 8-1 starting out, but by the time the second half of the playoff loss to Atlanta, they had lost 9 starters to injury, including Driver, Green, Glenn, Sharper, Clifton, Tauscher, Johnson, etc.

Stats never come close to revealing the true story, and in football it's much more the case.

The funny thing about it too as concerns Favre that people don't give him credit for. Brett Favre would be the first one to lay all the blame on himself even when what is written above is so true.

GO PACKERS!

Actually in that particular game he threw Schroeder firmly under the bus...then put it in reverse and backed over him for good measure.

[mraynrand]

blah, blah, blah is all I hear. The point wasn't to compare Favre with anyone, just to show most all QB's with several playoff runs have comparable numbers to Brett. I just don't get all the bashing. big damn deal, he threw a bunch of picks against the Rams. They were a much better team and he knew they had to score to keep up with that team, as I recall most of those picks came trying to make up a big deficit.....and christ get off this traitor crap already. I'm sure most of your wives change their minds about shit on a daily basis and you still keep her around!

I always get riled up about that Rams game because 3 INTs came after the game was over - the Pack down by at least three scores with about a quarter left. And depending on Schroeder, Favre was responsible for 1 or 2 of the first 3. Favre actually played quite well in that game - the run blocking was for shit, the pass pro not much better, and other guys (Freeman and Schroeder) made mistakes. Stats in football are always troublesome, as are the attempts to determine whether Favre made the receivers better or vice versa. And people routinely forget things like the fact that in 2002 the Packers were 8-1 starting out, but by the time the second half of the playoff loss to Atlanta, they had lost 9 starters to injury, including Driver, Green, Glenn, Sharper, Clifton, Tauscher, Johnson, etc.

Stats never come close to revealing the true story, and in football it's much more the case.

The funny thing about it too as concerns Favre that people don't give him credit for. Brett Favre would be the first one to lay all the blame on himself even when what is written above is so true.

GO PACKERS!

Actually in that particular game he threw Schroeder firmly under the bus...then put it in reverse and backed over him for good measure.

Did he?

[SMACKTALKIE]

So................ I have wondered this many times over the last year.

I realize there is no way of getting a solid answer to this question.

But.

Does anyone think this whole Favre to the Vikings thing could have been avoided if TT had somehow acquired Randy Moss?

Just a thought.

[Spaulding]

So................ I have wondered this many times over the last year.

I realize there is no way of getting a solid answer to this question.

But.

Does anyone think this whole Favre to the Vikings thing could have been avoided if TT had somehow acquired Randy Moss?

Just a thought.

Not sure I see it having that much of a bearing even if TT successful trades for Moss in 2007. I guess it's possible Brett doesn't play his annual "Am I gonna retire or not" game and commits to 2008. 2009 is another story though as even with Moss we obviously had issues on defense in 2008 and likely wouldn't have done enough to push far into the playoffs even with Favre and Brett.

The only way I see a correlation IMO is if Moss put the Packers over the Edge in 2007 and we win the SB. Brett might then have ridden into the sunset quite happily and as a Packer legend with everybody's respect. Then again he might have come back in 2008 and when the defense caved and we failed to mirror the 2007 season he might have retired for good this offseason.

Anyways, I wouldn't mind fast forwarding a few years when all the Brett hoopla is mostly behind us.