NFC North QB Race 2009

[pbmax]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

[Gunakor]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If Rodgers is injured they have to put him on the injury report. So we'll know on Wednesday. They aren't going to hide that with the NFL currently investigating the Brett Favre deal from last season.

In any case, while Cutler looks to be much better than the showing he gave the Packers, I couldn't rate him #1 in the NFCN. 6/5 TD to INT ratio leaves something to be desired. I'd rate Favre at #1 at this point. Cutler and Rodgers I'd have about even. Give the nod to Rodgers because he won the head to head matchup.

[Partial]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

[Partial]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If Rodgers is injured they have to put him on the injury report. So we'll know on Wednesday. They aren't going to hide that with the NFL currently investigating the Brett Favre deal from last season.

In any case, while Cutler looks to be much better than the showing he gave the Packers, I couldn't rate him #1 in the NFCN. 6/5 TD to INT ratio leaves something to be desired. I'd rate Favre at #1 at this point. Cutler and Rodgers I'd have about even. Give the nod to Rodgers because he won the head to head matchup.

I don't buy that teams always put there injured players on the report and are completely truthful about it. Case in point: Brady was listed as questionable every week in 2007 or 2006.

[Gunakor]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

What type of injury do you suppose he has? Watching him on the field, I didn't notice anything unusual. His arm strength seems to be fine, several of his misses the past 2 weeks were overthrows. He still is pretty good with his legs too. Did you see something out of the ordinary that looked like a minor injury?

[Partial]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

What type of injury do you suppose he has? Watching him on the field, I didn't notice anything unusual. His arm strength seems to be fine, several of his misses the past 2 weeks were overthrows. He still is pretty good with his legs too. Did you see something out of the ordinary that looked like a minor injury?

Even on the deep passes without pressure he's throwing it long or short. Perhaps its just a conspiracy theory in my head but I think he's hurt.

[Gunakor]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If Rodgers is injured they have to put him on the injury report. So we'll know on Wednesday. They aren't going to hide that with the NFL currently investigating the Brett Favre deal from last season.

In any case, while Cutler looks to be much better than the showing he gave the Packers, I couldn't rate him #1 in the NFCN. 6/5 TD to INT ratio leaves something to be desired. I'd rate Favre at #1 at this point. Cutler and Rodgers I'd have about even. Give the nod to Rodgers because he won the head to head matchup.

I don't buy that teams always put there injured players on the report and are completely truthful about it. Case in point: Brady was listed as questionable every week in 2007 or 2006.

And Bill Belicheat is your example? I already know that guy is a fucking liar. Please tell me you have a better example than that.

[Partial]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If Rodgers is injured they have to put him on the injury report. So we'll know on Wednesday. They aren't going to hide that with the NFL currently investigating the Brett Favre deal from last season.

In any case, while Cutler looks to be much better than the showing he gave the Packers, I couldn't rate him #1 in the NFCN. 6/5 TD to INT ratio leaves something to be desired. I'd rate Favre at #1 at this point. Cutler and Rodgers I'd have about even. Give the nod to Rodgers because he won the head to head matchup.

I don't buy that teams always put there injured players on the report and are completely truthful about it. Case in point: Brady was listed as questionable every week in 2007 or 2006.

And Bill Belicheat is your example? I already know that guy is a fucking liar. Please tell me you have a better example than that.

I don't have any evidence. I think he's injured. Let's hope so because he has looked a lot better in the past.

[MOBB DEEP]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.
4. Rodgers -- because I hate him

Fixed it for you... go to bed drunky

lol, b/c i hate him

[Rastak]

1 Rodgers 97.2
2 Favre 94.5
3 Cutler 86.2
4 Stafford 57

Race is tightening up a bit.

[Sparkey]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

[ThunderDan]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

You forgot the part where we aren't cool either!

It must be so delightful to live in a made-up world and scream that everyone is a jerk for pointing out reality.

[Partial]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

Actually, not what I'm saying at all. Fine, he's not hurt, he's just bad. He looks worse than average this year. He is the reason the offense has struggled majorly since he is the QB and teams only go as far as a QB will carry them. Cut the crap.

I personally think he is inured because he looks like crap. If he's not injured, then he is just a poor excuse of a quarterback. He has led an inept offense for two games and led an okay one for one game against a highschool JV team. Sure, he hasn't made any mistakes, but he has only made one play. Cutler has made more plays in three games than Rodgers has in 19 now in the NFC north. Sad.

[Bossman641]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

Actually, not what I'm saying at all. Fine, he's not hurt, he's just bad. He looks worse than average this year. He is the reason the offense has struggled majorly since he is the QB and teams only go as far as a QB will carry them. Cut the crap.

It's shit like this that you say that makes people jump all over you. Worse than average? Really? He is the reason? Not the OL whiffing on blocks? Or the receivers dropping numerous balls? Or the running game still getting on track?

Can Rodgers play better? Yes. It is hardly all on him though.

[Zool]

Look people, i know some of us like to argue, but can't you just start ignoring Partial and argue amongst yourselves?