Tweet
I don't have insider on ESPN but it seems Westbrook has not been getting many offers and GB might bring in him cheap for a one year deal. I wouldn't mind this at all, I think Westbrook still has a lot of value as a 3rd down back.
-
-
somebody sent me a blurp of that article today; would not get too excited yet. The just was........the longer Westbook sits out there..the more likely it is TT will bring him in for a visit.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER -
Agreed, I believe teams are just waiting until after the draft but TT should jump on a deal for Westbrook before someone else takes him. Westbrook is a high character guy and could be a nice change of pace back with Ryan Grant. Would much rather have Westbrook on a screen play than Grant.Originally posted by BretskyComment
-
This would be a nice pick-up by providing another dimension to an already potent offense.Comment
-
Yes please."I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny MurraughComment
-
This.Originally posted by ND72
Seems like a TT move as he waits for interest...Comment
-
if we could keep him from being hit at all this would be a decent signing
otherwise we would be putting our eggs in a basket that probably won't make it out of preseason.Comment
-
The thread title is off. Wouldn't Rodgers be more likely to throw a screen pass to Westbrook?"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
the thing no one has mentioned that would benefit the packers is....veteran presence in the locker room.
If he can return kicks and punts, and be a positive influence for some young guys his value would be huge.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince LombardiComment
-
With his concussion history, he would be the last guy who should return punts/kicks.Originally posted by bobbleheadComment
-
ya i can't imagine that's the job of a long-time vet...Originally posted by SparkeyComment
-
Yea I don't think he is durable enough to be a return man.Comment
-
With Westbrook's history of concussions I'd pass. If the Packers want a veteran RB presense in the lockerroom all they have to do is make a call to Mr. Green teaching over at De Pere High School.
Comment
-
This is the type of "big name" FA that I would like to see the Packers sign. Someone that hasn't garnered much attention and thus would come cheap, but has a chance of proving himself to be a useful and wily, experienced veteran.
Other teams can keep overpaying for overrated talent. This? This sort of thing, I like.Comment
-
I don't really care where they go at RB. I wouldn't mind a younger guy, wouldn't mind Ahman (mainly because I like him so much), and this is intriguing to me also. Westbrook, when healthy, would give a different dimension than Grant can give the team. How about we resign Ahman, sign Westbrook, and go with four RBs.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted ThompsonComment
Comment