Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers D to Decline in 2010?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    How the hell did this thread get thrown off? There was a reason why it was decided to put the Favre talk into one thread as I recall... something about contentiousness and other threads getting derailed...

    Anyway, here's an article from Bleacher Report, a site that (not unlike a few others that shall remain nameless) requires you to search through the garbage to find some decent content. The article puts forth a good argument that I'm wrong about the pass rush being the biggest problem.

    From BleacherReport.com, your destination for the latest news on your teams and topics in sports.

    Green Bay Packers Needn't Worry About Getting a New Pass Rusher

    Clay Matthews III stepped into the season expected by most to be just a good, solid pick for the Green Bay Packers in 2009. But a candidate for the defensive rookie of the year award? Who would have thought that?

    Ten sacks and multiple forced fumble recoveries seem to indicate that this is more than just good player. He's the real deal, a future Hall of Famer, and a damn good player.

    Packer Nation was so thrilled by this player that they couldn't resist thought of adding a second player like Matthews to increase pressure on opposing quarterbacks. The possibilities would seem limitless.

    Jerry Hughes and Sergio Kindle became favorites for the 23rd pick in the 2010 NFL draft. They got Bulaga instead. Although most Packers fans feel he was wonderful pick, he certainly was not what Packer nation was expecting.

    There were still seven more picks to go, Thompson will pick up a pass rusher later or trade up to get one. Neither happened.

    So why shouldn't Packer nation be nervous about facing Tom Brady, Brett Favre, Romo, or Matt Schaub? Because, it's not the pass rushers fault, it's the secondary.

    The Unseen Pass Rushing Ability

    The Packers produced a measly 13 sacks in their first eight games. Not nearly enough to pressure anyone.

    But after the Tampa Bay game, two things happened. One was the fact that Packers knew that they were better than this, and had to step it up a notch. So they did.

    Second, Aaron Kampman was injured, and sat out during the Cowboy game. He tore a ligament in his leg against the 49ers and was gone for the season.

    Why is Kampman's injury important? It gave way for Brad Jones to show what he's made of.

    Brad Jones is by no means a Clay Matthews. That's for certain.

    But I think that Packer nation has salivated so much at the thought of getting another Clay that they've forgotten that they don't need another Clay Matthews, just another good player. And Brad Jones probably fits that ticket perfectly.

    Plus, Brad Jones might get more help on his part now. Ryan Pickett has been moved to defensive end. Theoretically, Jones will be given a lot more room to get to the quarterback with Pickett now drawing double and even triple teams on his side.

    Pickett is a big guy who weighs 340 pounds in case you didn't know!

    From Romo to Hasselbeck (a seven-game period), the Packers produced an astonishing 24 sacks. That would equate to about 55 sacks in a season.

    I don't know how many of my Packer friends have noticed this fact. But I'm assuming that it wasn't very many. Mostly because of the fact Jerry Hughes was so demanded, and because I don't think I've heard from anyone else that they saw Packers producing so many sacks in the second half of the season. And I mean nobody .

    The Seen Depleted Secondary

    Most cite Kurt Warner, Ben Roethlisberger, and Brett Favre as the three main culprits who exposed the Packers inability to properly rush the quarterback. Personally, I think Smith belongs in that category as well. If you don't think so, then watch the second half of the 49er's game.

    But Warner, Burger King, and Smith all had something that Favre didn't have. And that was a depleted Packers secondary to pick apart.

    It was the fact that the Packers were, at the time, unable to sack the quarterback as to why Favre was able to pass so many touchdowns.

    Warner had more touchdowns than incompletions. He was only sacked once, but some argue that the Cards have the best offensive line in the NFC. That is evident with the fact that Warner was sacked only 26 times in the regular season.

    And Warner had a receiver corps that had three 1,000 yard receivers in 2008. That is sheer evidence of a depleted secondary, not a poor sacking ability.

    Favre's passing stats in the two games against the Packers were 271 yards, and 244 yards. In fact, 14-time sacked Aaron Rodgers was able to get 287 yards, and a career high 384 yards in those games.

    Compare that to Burger King's 503 yards and Warner's 373 yards. And even Alex Smith was able to get more than 200 yards in the second half the game where Al Harris was injured for the rest of the season.

    Favre wasn't exposing a terrible secondary, he was exposing a poor pass rushing ability. Anyone who doubts this needs to just watch the highlight in which Favre had over seven seconds to find a receiver.That's right, seven seconds.

    And we all know that even the greatest corner backs can't cover forever.

    So what exactly am I trying to say?

    There Was A Switcheroo

    The Packers didn't have a bad secondary and a bad pass rushing ability at the same time. The fact is that one was bad for the first half of the season, and the other was bad for the second half of the season.

    They just happened to switch so quickly that I don't think anyone noticed.

    The only time the Packers had both a good pass rushing ability and a complete secondary was against the Cowboys, and the first half against the 49ers.

    In that period, a total of 10 points were scored by the opponents, and the opponents quarterback was sacked eight times.

    Aaron Kampman's injury allowed Brad Jones to come in, just around the time that Harris was injured.

    I think Packer Nation just doesn't realize that you don't need someone like Clay Matthews to create enough pressure on quarterbacks. It's almost as though we think there is no such thing as anything in between an elite sacker and someone who can't sack at all.

    The Packers may not have the best pass rushing ability in the league, maybe not even an elite pass rushing ability. But I certainly think they have enough now to get the job done.

    By the start of next season, Jones and Matthews will have a year under their belt, and Harris will be healthy. Harris is making a remarkable recovery.

    This should be enough for the Packers defense to perform like they did in those two games.
    I'm not convinced that some pressure on the QB in those games the defense was shredded wouldn't have made a big difference, but a defensive backfield that included 5th, 6th and 7th options at CB and safeties off the street also played a big role.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Joemailman
      Doesn't the Favre talk belong in the Favre thread?
      I stopped counting the number of times the "F" word appears in this thread when I got to 60.
      "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        Originally posted by JustinHarrell
        Rice > Jennings IMO
        Driver > Barrian IMO
        Harvin > Jones IMO
        Shiancoe last year > super young Finley although Finley has flashed signs of near future greatness.
        I'd give Jennings at least a wash with Rice. I was amazed at how much Rice was single covered last year--even after showing he was ready to break out. The Baltimore game stands out as a prime example when the Ravens tried to cover Rice one-on-one with Frank Walker. Having Favre, Peterson, Harvin, and Berrian as a deep threat opened things up for Rice to get one-on-one coverage.

        I'd agree with Driver and Harvin. Finley actually had better numbers than Shiancoe--when you consider he played 3 fewer games (closer to 4).

        Shiancoe = 56 catches, 566 yards, 10.1 in 16 games (I don't put much credence in his TD catches; not one came outside the redzone; he was very Bubba-like in his TD catches)

        Finley = 55 catches, 676 yards, 12.3 in basically 12 games
        What? They are TE's, the TD's for them ARE SUPPOSED to come in the redzone. It's pretty rare to see 30+ yard TD catches from a TE. As physically gifted as Finley is, I am willing to be most his TD's come in the redzone as well.

        Redzones are built for TE's like finley and Shiancoe. Just saying, no idea why you take that credit away. TD catches in the redzone at times are even more impressive, because it's harder to get open on a much smaller field.

        Comment


        • #94
          I fixed the thread title for you boys. Hammer away.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by vince
            How the hell did this thread get thrown off? There was a reason why it was decided to put the Favre talk into one thread as I recall... something about contentiousness and other threads getting derailed...

            Anyway, here's an article from Bleacher Report, a site that (not unlike a few others that shall remain nameless) requires you to search through the garbage to find some decent content. The article puts forth a good argument that I'm wrong about the pass rush being the biggest problem.

            From BleacherReport.com, your destination for the latest news on your teams and topics in sports.

            Green Bay Packers Needn't Worry About Getting a New Pass Rusher

            Clay Matthews III stepped into the season expected by most to be just a good, solid pick for the Green Bay Packers in 2009. But a candidate for the defensive rookie of the year award? Who would have thought that?

            Ten sacks and multiple forced fumble recoveries seem to indicate that this is more than just good player. He's the real deal, a future Hall of Famer, and a damn good player.

            Packer Nation was so thrilled by this player that they couldn't resist thought of adding a second player like Matthews to increase pressure on opposing quarterbacks. The possibilities would seem limitless.

            Jerry Hughes and Sergio Kindle became favorites for the 23rd pick in the 2010 NFL draft. They got Bulaga instead. Although most Packers fans feel he was wonderful pick, he certainly was not what Packer nation was expecting.

            There were still seven more picks to go, Thompson will pick up a pass rusher later or trade up to get one. Neither happened.

            So why shouldn't Packer nation be nervous about facing Tom Brady, Brett Favre, Romo, or Matt Schaub? Because, it's not the pass rushers fault, it's the secondary.

            The Unseen Pass Rushing Ability

            The Packers produced a measly 13 sacks in their first eight games. Not nearly enough to pressure anyone.

            But after the Tampa Bay game, two things happened. One was the fact that Packers knew that they were better than this, and had to step it up a notch. So they did.

            Second, Aaron Kampman was injured, and sat out during the Cowboy game. He tore a ligament in his leg against the 49ers and was gone for the season.

            Why is Kampman's injury important? It gave way for Brad Jones to show what he's made of.

            Brad Jones is by no means a Clay Matthews. That's for certain.

            But I think that Packer nation has salivated so much at the thought of getting another Clay that they've forgotten that they don't need another Clay Matthews, just another good player. And Brad Jones probably fits that ticket perfectly.

            Plus, Brad Jones might get more help on his part now. Ryan Pickett has been moved to defensive end. Theoretically, Jones will be given a lot more room to get to the quarterback with Pickett now drawing double and even triple teams on his side.

            Pickett is a big guy who weighs 340 pounds in case you didn't know!

            From Romo to Hasselbeck (a seven-game period), the Packers produced an astonishing 24 sacks. That would equate to about 55 sacks in a season.

            I don't know how many of my Packer friends have noticed this fact. But I'm assuming that it wasn't very many. Mostly because of the fact Jerry Hughes was so demanded, and because I don't think I've heard from anyone else that they saw Packers producing so many sacks in the second half of the season. And I mean nobody .

            The Seen Depleted Secondary

            Most cite Kurt Warner, Ben Roethlisberger, and Brett Favre as the three main culprits who exposed the Packers inability to properly rush the quarterback. Personally, I think Smith belongs in that category as well. If you don't think so, then watch the second half of the 49er's game.

            But Warner, Burger King, and Smith all had something that Favre didn't have. And that was a depleted Packers secondary to pick apart.

            It was the fact that the Packers were, at the time, unable to sack the quarterback as to why Favre was able to pass so many touchdowns.

            Warner had more touchdowns than incompletions. He was only sacked once, but some argue that the Cards have the best offensive line in the NFC. That is evident with the fact that Warner was sacked only 26 times in the regular season.

            And Warner had a receiver corps that had three 1,000 yard receivers in 2008. That is sheer evidence of a depleted secondary, not a poor sacking ability.

            Favre's passing stats in the two games against the Packers were 271 yards, and 244 yards. In fact, 14-time sacked Aaron Rodgers was able to get 287 yards, and a career high 384 yards in those games.

            Compare that to Burger King's 503 yards and Warner's 373 yards. And even Alex Smith was able to get more than 200 yards in the second half the game where Al Harris was injured for the rest of the season.

            Favre wasn't exposing a terrible secondary, he was exposing a poor pass rushing ability. Anyone who doubts this needs to just watch the highlight in which Favre had over seven seconds to find a receiver.That's right, seven seconds.

            And we all know that even the greatest corner backs can't cover forever.

            So what exactly am I trying to say?

            There Was A Switcheroo

            The Packers didn't have a bad secondary and a bad pass rushing ability at the same time. The fact is that one was bad for the first half of the season, and the other was bad for the second half of the season.

            They just happened to switch so quickly that I don't think anyone noticed.

            The only time the Packers had both a good pass rushing ability and a complete secondary was against the Cowboys, and the first half against the 49ers.

            In that period, a total of 10 points were scored by the opponents, and the opponents quarterback was sacked eight times.

            Aaron Kampman's injury allowed Brad Jones to come in, just around the time that Harris was injured.

            I think Packer Nation just doesn't realize that you don't need someone like Clay Matthews to create enough pressure on quarterbacks. It's almost as though we think there is no such thing as anything in between an elite sacker and someone who can't sack at all.

            The Packers may not have the best pass rushing ability in the league, maybe not even an elite pass rushing ability. But I certainly think they have enough now to get the job done.

            By the start of next season, Jones and Matthews will have a year under their belt, and Harris will be healthy. Harris is making a remarkable recovery.

            This should be enough for the Packers defense to perform like they did in those two games.
            I'm not convinced that some pressure on the QB in those games the defense was shredded wouldn't have made a big difference, but a defensive backfield that included 5th, 6th and 7th options at CB and safeties off the street also played a big role.
            That's a pretty good article. You'd think that the Press-Gazette or JSOnline would be the source for logical analysis like that, but nope, we have to dig it up from obscure bloggers.

            It's a little over-simplified, as it mentions Faver only exploiting a lack of pass rush, when he also exploited a backup safety who had only been with the team for two weeks. It wasn't one or the other, but both lack of pass rush and depleted secondary, at least in the first Vikings game.

            Anyway, despite the new title, maybe this thread can still be saved if we all wish really hard! Maybe we can click our heels together or something.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by packerbacker1234
              Originally posted by ThunderDan
              I appreciated what BF did for the Packers but there were a number of NFL QBs who got traded because of BF's endurance.

              Brunnel, Hasselbeck and Brooks. Who knows what they would have done in GB?
              Hasselback you have a good gage fore - as he was starter after he left and is still a starter today. He is a decent QB. Not great, and I am not sure I would be asking him to win a SB for you.

              The others are sort of meh for what we can say. It's a lot of what ifs. But durability aside, Favre did have to continue to play well to keep his job, and he did play well. He just had that tendacy to blow it in the playoffs... sort of like McNabb... except were not philly so we don't chase QB's out.
              Brunnell is a meh??

              He took the EXPANSION Jacksonville Jaguars to the AFC Championship in their 2nd year of existance. After Jacksonville's original season in 1995 they made the playoffs from 96-99 and made the AFC Championship twice in 96 and 99.

              Just think what Brunnell might have done on an established team ready to go on the playoff runs the Packers did in the same time frame.

              I can't say for sure that GB would have done better or worse but stating that only BF could have carried the Pack is ridiculous. Wolf drafted good QB prospects and Mike Holmgren coached them up.
              But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

              -Tim Harmston

              Comment


              • #97
                Brunell played in 3 Probowls. Pretty good career.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Did anyone realize that Tom Copa was from Coon Rapids? He played Center, but I thought he was poorly suited for it.
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    This is just plain dumb:

                    Pickett now drawing double and even triple teams on his side.
                    Triple teams just don't happen. And Pickett isn't getting double teamed unless he unleashes a pass rush heretofore undetected in his game.

                    1. I agree that Jones has not shown all he can do. He was often pulled in teh various nickel/dime packages.

                    2. Secondary was depleted, but even when they held their coverage reasonably well, opposing QBs had far too much time. See Roethlisberger's last pass. The Arizona game was an example where the backs and LBs couldn't do what they were being asked to do.

                    So of that will improve with another year learning not to let receivers release where they should not be allowed to go.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • C.H.U.D.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                        I think Peyton is better than Favre ever was, but that's just one guys opinion.

                        We disagree. I don't know if I've had this conversatin with you, but I've had it with others. It ends the same way, nobody changes their mind.

                        I understand your opinion. You might be right. It's going to take time to see how much that guy is missed. I'm guessing not much at all.


                        Manning couldn't do this when he was 23, much less at 38. Favre is Favre, and makes a lot of plays no one, and I mean no one could ever make at the QB position. He may have his complete screw ups, and playoff melt downs, but more than anything he makes your jaw drop to the floor, and that is what makes him special.

                        Manning, and Brady? Sure they are good, even great but I have never watched P. Manning and saw magic, saw something no one else has ever done on a football field.

                        Another play I have never seen Payton Manning make, at any age, much less at age 40


                        Again, Manning has his own form of greatness, but for my entertainment dollar Favre wins hands down

                        Comment


                        • Manning may not be much of a scrambler or good at ad-libbing once the play starts to breakdown but he is the best at letting his teammates know when they screw up.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                            Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                            I think Peyton is better than Favre ever was, but that's just one guys opinion.

                            We disagree. I don't know if I've had this conversatin with you, but I've had it with others. It ends the same way, nobody changes their mind.

                            I understand your opinion. You might be right. It's going to take time to see how much that guy is missed. I'm guessing not much at all.


                            Manning couldn't do this when he was 23, much less at 38. Favre is Favre, and makes a lot of plays no one, and I mean no one could ever make at the QB position. He may have his complete screw ups, and playoff melt downs, but more than anything he makes your jaw drop to the floor, and that is what makes him special.

                            Manning, and Brady? Sure they are good, even great but I have never watched P. Manning and saw magic, saw something no one else has ever done on a football field.

                            Another play I have never seen Payton Manning make, at any age, much less at age 40


                            Again, Manning has his own form of greatness, but for my entertainment dollar Favre wins hands down
                            Yeah, sometimes with our hate blinders on we can forget exactly why people are just excited when he steps on the field. Yes, he has a long history now of blowing it in the playoffs, but you can't deny that every time he walks on the field, it can be hard to remove your eyes because you may see a play that may never be experienced again. Favre is just special in that way - one of the best improvisers and "play makers" to really ever play the game. Of course, he isn't th ebest with late game decision making per say either.

                            Still, it's plays like that on why he is still one of the most entertaining players in the league. He's still making plays like those in his old age. NFL is just more exciting when he is in it.

                            Oh, to also add to what peyton is known for:



                            Oh, and who can forget is well deserved Super Bowl MVP:



                            1td, 1int, 1 lost fumble. There's your MVP boys.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                              Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                              I think Peyton is better than Favre ever was, but that's just one guys opinion.

                              We disagree. I don't know if I've had this conversatin with you, but I've had it with others. It ends the same way, nobody changes their mind.

                              I understand your opinion. You might be right. It's going to take time to see how much that guy is missed. I'm guessing not much at all.


                              Manning couldn't do this when he was 23, much less at 38. Favre is Favre, and makes a lot of plays no one, and I mean no one could ever make at the QB position. He may have his complete screw ups, and playoff melt downs, but more than anything he makes your jaw drop to the floor, and that is what makes him special.

                              Manning, and Brady? Sure they are good, even great but I have never watched P. Manning and saw magic, saw something no one else has ever done on a football field.

                              Another play I have never seen Payton Manning make, at any age, much less at age 40


                              Again, Manning has his own form of greatness, but for my entertainment dollar Favre wins hands down
                              Bill Russell once said most blocked shots are the result of a defensive breakdown somewhere else. Colledge lost his guy a early and Favre had to bail on this throw. Its a tremendous effort, but its precisely how you live and die with the guy. If he takes a bad step on his run, he could easily have missed the target (possible INT) or gotten hit and lose the ball.

                              In some ways, he is the perfect QB for an otherwise average offense that benefits from risk taking.

                              This play also demonstrates one of the flaws in Colledge's game. Favre has called Lee in to block on the right side. But the Seaturkeys are bluffing here. The threatening LB drops into the middle short zone. On the Left, the OLB on the slot WR/TE blitzes and Clifton gets him. Colledge is now watching the guy on Clifton's inside shoulder AND his own DT. He glances at the DE as he runs a stunt into the middle for too long and cannot recover to block the DT who is going wide into the T-G gap. As it turned out, Wells is available to take the stunting DE and does. Colledge should not have waited.

                              There are only three possible rushers on the right side. With Lee, there is would seem to be no need to slide protection right. But we cannot know the line call. Colledge is faced with two rushers and watches both. Either by assignment or by line call, he should have just been watching one even on stunt. Its also possible no one but Clifton saw that outside blitzer. And so Colledge recognizes that the LT is unavailable too late. Its a nicely designed rush and works to a T with Colledges one moment of hesitation.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • I just watched it a few more times and they did not slide the protection right. Wells, after the snap ignores the DT or Nose on his right shoulder (Spitz takes him) and steps left. Colledge heads left too and then at the last crucial second he takes his eyes off his guy to track the stunting DE. He should have known Wells was available. By adding Lee, they have effectively slid protection left which means Colledge should have taken the wide part of the DE/DT twist knowing Wells was taking the inside move. That freed Clifton to take the wide blitzer.

                                My coaches would have called that thinking too much.
                                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X