I've seen people say hawk is "as good in coverage as our other LBs" as though that's 1) true and 2) something to be proud of.
And I see people saying they'd rather have picked Hawk over VD, even given the results of the past years. Hawk has never been more than just OK. Followig his injury in 2008, he's been an absolute liability in coverage. They hardly even let him cover even the slowest sluggish TEs and Fullbacks. Bollard was almost too much for him. Hawk = Bleah!
http://s453.photobucket.com/albums/q...rent=Bleah.mp4
http://s453.photobucket.com/albums/q...rent=Bleah.mp4



Comment