Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thompson vs. Belichick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    I've said it many times in several forums, if Thompson hadn't hit it big getting Aaron Rodgers, his reputation and Packer fortunes in general would be EXTREMELY different. Call it luck or call it skill in drafting Rodgers, but without that, we'd be in pretty bad shape given Ted's overall way of doing things.
    100%...Bang On ! Exactly... and please ...hahahaa..I was going to ask:

    Can't we agree on this as factual as it is. It just simply is this:

    Bill Belichick is light years superior to Ted Thompson and any other NFL man when it comes to 'how to get to the Super Bowl and hopefully win'.

    Bill Belichick is highly respected as the greatest mind and all about winning in the NFL. His head is into it 24-7 in terms of what he might do to improve his teams roster. His ability to game plan and manage ..his half time adjustment ability and success...are all 5* STAR qualities.

    You cannot NOT have courage and the nuts to be anywhere even close to the respect and accorded praise that Bill Belichick is awarded by NFL analysts.

    Ted Thompson just doesn't have the go get it attitude Packer fans might expect. We need a GM that studies BB and at least tries to emulate all his best qualities.


    I'm no longer disappointed in Ted Thompson. I've grown to expect little more growth from him. Soon he'll be gone and I can have some real hope the Green Bay Packers may enter an Era of more REAL Super Bowl hope for Packer Nation.
    Last edited by woodbuck27; 04-13-2016, 04:32 PM.
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
      A counterfactual is only useful if it tells you something you did not know.

      Code:
      GM               QB              Team
      John Schneider   Russell Wilson  Seahawks
      Kevin Colbert    Rothliesberger  Steelers
      Bill Parcells    Tony Romo       Cowboys
      Belichick        Tom Brady       Patriots
      Dave Gettleman   Cam Newton      Panthers
      Pollen           Manning         Colts
      Polian           Collins         Panthers
      Polian           Kelly           Bills
      Jerry Reese      Manning         Giants
      Newsome          Flacco          Ravens
      This explains the allergic reaction to Manning
      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by woodbuck27 View Post
        I'm no longer disappointed in Ted Thompson. I've grown to expect little more growth from him. Soon he'll be gone and I can have some real hope the Green Bay Packers may enter an Era of more REAL Super Bowl hope for Packer Nation.
        I just don't know what's wrong with the Packers that they can't land the greatest GM/Coach in modern NFL history. Always sloppy seconds with this organization.
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
          I just don't know what's wrong with the Packers that they can't land the greatest GM/Coach in modern NFL history. Always sloppy seconds with this organization.
          Just wait until the next GM is worse than Thompson.

          Fire Murphy!
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
            I've said it many times in several forums, if Thompson hadn't hit it big getting Aaron Rodgers, his reputation and Packer fortunes in general would be EXTREMELY different. Call it luck or call it skill in drafting Rodgers, but without that, we'd be in pretty bad shape given Ted's overall way of doing things.
            When Rodgers went down a few years ago, we went 2-5-1. That pretty much sums up our overall roster minus the most important player.

            Even though I think the defense has improved the past few years, it has been an achilles heel more often than not since dunderdummy has been here. Add to that the ZBS, soft philosophy underpinning the running game, and it makes it very difficult for this team to be successful, or even average, without a top-flight QB.

            We simply aren't built to take over games in the trenches, consistently shut down another teams offense, or consistently run the ball to take pressure off our QB. If our QB goes down, we're pretty much done.

            Homers would say that is pretty much the case with every team, but I would argue it is much more pronounced with the Packers than any other team. The Broncos won last year's SB essentially without even having a starting caliber QB on their roster. Put Manning and his noodle arm on the Packers, and we probably go 5-11.
            wist

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by wist43 View Post
              When Rodgers went down a few years ago, we went 2-5-1. That pretty much sums up our overall roster minus the most important player.
              Two things I wonder:

              1. Would things have been as bad if Seneca Wallace hadn't gone down, too? Not that he was great, but at least he was experienced.
              2. Would things be as bad with Hundley now as the back-up?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                When Rodgers went down a few years ago, we went 2-5-1. That pretty much sums up our overall roster minus the most important player.
                Did the Colts win 1 or 2 without Manning?

                Patsies did better but missed playoffs without Brady

                Steelers without Rapeburger - not so hot

                Great QBs sort of have a positive effect on their team.

                It's great that TT hired a guy like Stubby who revived Favre's career and made Rodgers'
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Patler View Post
                  Two things I wonder:

                  1. Would things have been as bad if Seneca Wallace hadn't gone down, too? Not that he was great, but at least he was experienced.
                  2. Would things be as bad with Hundley now as the back-up?
                  The answer is likely no. A lot of people tend to forget the Packers went 2-5-1 with their 3rd and 4th quarterbacks, not their backup quarterback. Good teams can often be competitive with their backup QB, but not their 3rd. In 2014 Arizona won games with Stanton playing after Palmer got hurt. But when Stanton got hurt, they went 1-3, and the win was a 12-6 score.
                  I can't run no more
                  With that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places
                  Say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                  A thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Patler View Post
                    Two things I wonder:

                    1. Would things have been as bad if Seneca Wallace hadn't gone down, too? Not that he was great, but at least he was experienced.
                    2. Would things be as bad with Hundley now as the back-up?
                    My guess on 1 would be, yes... Wallace was a game manager at best; our offense, and indeed our entire team, is built around having an elite QB. Without an elite QB, we're a sub .500 team.

                    On #2?? Who knows... I like Hundley - we'll see. QB is almost impossible to project.
                    wist

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                      My guess on 1 would be, yes... Wallace was a game manager at best; our offense, and indeed our entire team, is built around having an elite QB. Without an elite QB, we're a sub .500 team.

                      On #2?? Who knows... I like Hundley - we'll see. QB is almost impossible to project.
                      I don't think Flynn was much different than Wallace, and over the years GB did fairly well with Flynn on the field. I think they could have done as well with Wallace, which may or may not have meant more W's in the games Tolzien played. Flynn was essentially 2-2-1 that year, and if he had played the whole game, the tie against MN might have been a W.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                        Without an elite QB, we're a sub .500 team.
                        like most teams with elite QBs. Some teams, built around their defense, have been able to win with average QBs, but even these teams mostly needed above average play from the QB to win championships. (e.g. 'recently,' Manning, Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Grossman - almost, )

                        An elite QB covers a lot of flaws, creates a winning climate resulting in lower draft picks, and it's extremely rare to find a team with a backup for an elite QB able to win consistently.
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          But I'll say it again, when comparing TT to BB8, you're comparing him to a guy who is arguably the best football mind in the modern NFL and may go down in history as the greatest NFL coach/GM ever. Not bad company.
                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Seneca Wallace stunk. We might have done a little better with a better back up - if they had gotten Tolzien prepared quicker for example, but my point was and is:

                            The Packer roster overall is substandard outside of Aaron Rodgers - pretty much everywhere. That would be what Ted is remembered for if not for Rodgers. I'm not all that enamored with Belichek either - that record without Brady says a lot about him.
                            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                              But I'll say it again, when comparing TT to BB8, you're comparing him to a guy who is arguably the best football mind in the modern NFL and may go down in history as the greatest NFL coach/GM ever. Not bad company.
                              Even the potentially greatest NFL coach/GM ever won barely 40% of his games for 6+ seasons, until Tom Brady became his QB.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Patler View Post
                                Even the potentially greatest NFL coach/GM ever won barely 40% of his games for 6+ seasons, until Tom Brady became his QB.
                                Sure and the sun warms the planet.

                                BB8 was also responsible for two other Super Bowl wins as an assistant, even stifling the high powered bills offense.
                                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X