2020 Wide Receivers

[bobblehead]

Unless these receivers come out and make me look like a fool this whole thing is a giant fraud cause it stinks.

Make no mistake. You don't need the WR room to help you in this regard.

[bobblehead]

I Completed my evaluation of the Seahawks today and as far as I am concerned you can take them off the list. They aren't winning no Super Bowl this year and probably won't even make the playoffs. Big drop off this year for Seattle and I have them finishing 3rd in their division.

So who is oh great one? Still waiting for the short list. 3 teams, packers aren't serious contenders. which 3 are?

Edit: Oh, but the seahawks took the guy you would have taken with our trade up. Was it a bad move? They were 6" from the division over SF last year and took your chosen top player. Why are they not a contender now?

[GB-Brandon]

So who is oh great one? Still waiting for the short list. 3 teams, packers aren't serious contenders. which 3 are?

Edit: Oh, but the seahawks took the guy you would have taken with our trade up. Was it a bad move? They were 6" from the division over SF last year and took your chosen top player. Why are they not a contender now?

Too many problems on the offensive and defensive lines. Zero pass rush. Too much age on the roster. Age = Injuries. One Rb coming off a fractured hip and the other coming off a torn ACL. I think this will be the end of the Pete Carroll era.

Wilson is gonna be 32 so he is certainly not a spring chicken anymore himself. He will have to win MVP to get this team into the playoffs. I don't see it. After Metcalf and Lockett they have their own receiver issues.

Packers have the better roster from top to bottom. The Seahawks and Packers both over-achieved last season. I see a little more hope for the Packers.

[bobblehead]

Too many problems on the offensive and defensive lines. Zero pass rush. Too much age on the roster. Age = Injuries. One Rb coming off a fractured hip and the other coming off a torn ACL. I think this will be the end of the Pete Carroll era.

Wilson is gonna be 32 so he is certainly not a spring chicken anymore himself. He will have to win MVP to get this team into the playoffs. I don't see it. After Metcalf and Lockett they have their own receiver issues.

Packers have the better roster from top to bottom. The Seahawks and Packers both over-achieved last season. I see a little more hope for the Packers.

I'll push this until opening kickoff. You are narrowing it down. Seahawks and packers are NOT serious contenders. Haven't seen you list ONE single team that is. You alluded to it. Give me a list of serious NFC contenders to win an Owl this year....or is it fixed and you guarantee that SF wins it because "rigged".

[GB-Brandon]

I'll push this until opening kickoff. You are narrowing it down. Seahawks and packers are NOT serious contenders. Haven't seen you list ONE single team that is. You alluded to it. Give me a list of serious NFC contenders to win an Owl this year....or is it fixed and you guarantee that SF wins it because "rigged".

San Francisco
Tampa Bay
New Orleans
Dallas
Philadelphia

I would put all those teams rosters ahead of the Packers right now and legit contenders in the NFC. They have all done a much better job filling holes and fielding a roster to win a Championship this year.

[bobblehead]

San Francisco
Tampa Bay
New Orleans
Dallas
Philadelphia

I would put all those teams rosters ahead of the Packers right now and legit contenders in the NFC. They have all done a much better job filling holes and fielding a roster to win a Championship this year.

Thank you. Tampa's roster isn't that good on D. Overall they are inferior to ours imo. Philadelphia also doesn't enamor me. Dallas is loaded. N.O. is pretty stellar. SF is stacked as well. HOWEVER, we have a better QB than 2 of those 3 teams, so really I only like N.O. Better than GB overall, and they have managed to screw up 2 playoffs in a row.

[RashanGary]

Thank you. Tampa's roster isn't that good on D. Overall they are inferior to ours imo. Philadelphia also doesn't enamor me. Dallas is loaded. N.O. is pretty stellar. SF is stacked as well. HOWEVER, we have a better QB than 2 of those 3 teams, so really I only like N.O. Better than GB overall, and they have managed to screw up 2 playoffs in a row.

Um, Brees fell off bad even before the injury. He’s manning at the end now. Rodgers is clearly better than all 3

[RashanGary]

Something weird happens at the end for these QBs... their release looks in slow motion. Favres last year, Manning’s last two, brees last year and Brady too. It’s over for Brees and Brady IMO.

[RashanGary]

A lot can be said for simple things like snap count, tempo, decision making and a general feel for football that makes life easier for the whole team. Even though I consider those game manager qualities to be on par with arm talent as it pertains to winning, it’s still not enough when you’re competing against guys like Rodgers and Wilson who have it all still. And guys like Jackson and Mahommes who ate quickly getting there plus elite physical talent.

[Upnorth]

San Francisco
Tampa Bay
New Orleans
Dallas
Philadelphia

I would put all those teams rosters ahead of the Packers right now and legit contenders in the NFC. They have all done a much better job filling holes and fielding a roster to win a Championship this year.

Sf and no are both better than us I think however we definitely took the right steps to close with no.
I think we match up with philly better than last year. Tb is interesting but there new qb doesn't really fit ariens down field game anymore and I don't think they are in the playoff hunt.
Dallas is a bit of a wild card with McCarthy. They do concern me but im more concerned with Detroit than Dallas.

[GB-Brandon]

Sf and no are both better than us I think however we definitely took the right steps to close with no.
I think we match up with philly better than last year. Tb is interesting but there new qb doesn't really fit ariens down field game anymore and I don't think they are in the playoff hunt.
Dallas is a bit of a wild card with McCarthy. They do concern me but im more concerned with Detroit than Dallas.

Dallas could very well be getting ready to sign Earl Thomas too.

Detroit Should be a concern. I've seen their roster ranked as high as 12th in the league and they have played the Packers extremely tough. I have them as my sleeper.

[Upnorth]

List of nfcn playoff teams are GB no SF dal as division winners with det and ari as wild cards.

[Bretsky]

Um, Brees fell off bad even before the injury. He’s manning at the end now. Rodgers is clearly better than all 3

Last year Rodgers was to me not nearly as good as past years.

Whether that is him falling off , or not getting surrounded with help is debateable

[texaspackerbacker]

hahahahaha Yet we went 13-3. I do sort of agree with you, though, based on appearances - one reason I expect this year's team and record to be at least as good as last year's.

[bobblehead]

Um, Brees fell off bad even before the injury. He’s manning at the end now. Rodgers is clearly better than all 3

Brees QBR from ESPN crushed Rodgers 71 to 50. Standard rating was 116 to 95. Honestly it wasn't even close. Brees was 2nd to Tannehill and Rodgers was 12th.