Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AR wants out?!
Collapse
X
-
Is bending a little bit such a bad thing?Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostCutting a year kills their leverage with AR next year and reduces his trade value too. Everybody knows the Packers have given up on AR and wish to unload him. I don't see why this is a brilliant move. It's a hell of a concession to keep Rodgers on the team for 2021.
Perhaps the team thought Rodgers might actually retire. That's the best explanation to me.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Looks like the deal is worked out. He's back in GB.
Comment
-
I would just push back and say what a stupid example. How many HOFers are there? Look at how many busts there are instead. Also, where were those players picked? Andy Luck #1, Steve Young #1, etc etc.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostI’m pretty sure NE had around half their defensive starters opt out because of COVID too.
Brady is old as hell and it was probably time for him to move on but look at the ass talent they had two years ago. Was a shit team that got destroyed in playoffsz
Comment
-
Nonsense. This is clearly being reported as they will be trading Rodgers next year.Originally posted by RashanGary View PostIf this deal is real, the next choice the Packers have to make
Give Jordan Love a third year of development behind one of the GOATs (something that can help Loves development)
Or
Take the pick or picks and throw love in the fire with an extra piece or two around him
Comment
-
They might get a #2 for him. Might. Favre yielded two R3 and was younger amazingly.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostBut it's not just swapping Love for Rodgers. You have a chance to pick up a couple very high draft picks, and more importantly, save 30-40 million on the salary cap for a couple years. That can be used to keep their best players or sign free agents. If Love can play. Packers could come out of this looking very good.
Comment
-
Provided Rodgers plays well, they'll get more than that. Probably significantly more. Three big differences: 1) teams aren't afraid to give up draft capital in trades like they were back in 2008, 2) more QBs (Favre was the first with his 2009 season, Manning, Brees and Brady into their 40s) have played well at an old age than in the past, 3) Rodgers played better this year (and probably next year) than Favre did in 2007. Favre was good, but not MVP caliber good. Plus, Favre had two atrocious years leading into 2007. Rodgers was above average the two previous years.Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View PostThey might get a #2 for him. Might. Favre yielded two R3 and was younger amazingly."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Maybe the amount of moola he's earned already is the core root of the problem, I mean the guy shows up last night at Austin Straubel airport in his private plane.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostOne year. Rodgers will never hang around for a second year, his clock is ticking.
The Packers have essentially given up all their bargaining leverage now and then said "we negotiate again in a year." All signs point to the Packers making their peace with the new era. But I suppose it's still possible that Aaron appreciates this kid glove treatment and just decides to finish his career in GB. Maybe Murphy is the wise zen master.

Not only does that much money demotivate him cuz he now has more than 100 lifetimes worth of it, but it has turned him into a DIVA that thinks he's bigger than generations of Packer team management.
Comment
-
Sounds pretty right.Originally posted by Vincenzo View PostMaybe the amount of moola he's earned already is the core root of the problem, I mean the guy shows up last night at Austin Straubel airport in his private plane.
Not only does that much money demotivate him cuz he now has more than 100 lifetimes worth of it, but it has turned him into a DIVA that thinks he's bigger than generations of Packer team management.
Comment
-
Before I get corrected. This looks like I'm saying Favre and Manning played well into their 40s. It was late 30s. I believe Favre had an MVP like season at 39 and Manning at 38, Brees at 40, and Brady at 43.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostFavre was the first with his 2009 season, Manning, Brees and Brady into their 40s"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
In addition to that, Favre had the retirement issue. No one was going to give up a lot to possibly have Favre for only a year. It's a very different situation with Rodgers. Now, there is the issue of which teams Rodgers would be willing to go to. If he wants to play out west, Oakland and Vegas might be the only teams there looking for a QB. Maybe Rams if Stafford doesn't work out. You need at least 2 teams bidding against each other for there to be much market value.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostProvided Rodgers plays well, they'll get more than that. Probably significantly more. Three big differences: 1) teams aren't afraid to give up draft capital in trades like they were back in 2008, 2) more QBs (Favre was the first with his 2009 season, Manning, Brees and Brady into their 40s) have played well at an old age than in the past, 3) Rodgers played better this year (and probably next year) than Favre did in 2007. Favre was good, but not MVP caliber good. Plus, Favre had two atrocious years leading into 2007. Rodgers was above average the two previous years.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Two words:Originally posted by Joemailman View PostIn addition to that, Favre had the retirement issue. No one was going to give up a lot to possibly have Favre for only a year. It's a very different situation with Rodgers. Now, there is the issue of which teams Rodgers would be willing to go to. If he wants to play out west, Oakland and Vegas might be the only teams there looking for a QB. Maybe Rams if Stafford doesn't work out. You need at least 2 teams bidding against each other for there to be much market value.
Matt Stafford
If anyone thinks ARod is worth less than Stafford, they are nuts.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
Nobody pays hard-earned frog skins to watch Gutekunst and Murphy sit in a skybox. I once made the mistake of paying $200 of my minimum-wage earnings to watch Brett Hundley play against the Baltimore Ravens, who slaughtered the Pack 42-0, or something in that manner.Originally posted by Vincenzo View PostMaybe the amount of moola he's earned already is the core root of the problem, I mean the guy shows up last night at Austin Straubel airport in his private plane.
Not only does that much money demotivate him cuz he now has more than 100 lifetimes worth of it, but it has turned him into a DIVA that thinks he's bigger than generations of Packer team management.
12’s the face of the Packers, the race of the Packers. Fuck yeah, 12’s bigger than faceless management.
Comment


Comment