What do the Packers get for Aaron Rodgers?

[run pMc]

Next years round 1 would be nice too. I think it’s you who mentioned that if love stinks, having two firsts next year and a chance to move up in a good QB class is kind of ideal.

I know everyone is thinking we’re gonna get a haul, but I think pick 43 or next years first is about the best we can hope for.

Yeah, I think Caleb Williams or Drake Mays are at least as good as these guys if not (possibly much) better, and there will always be somebody coming out of left field who sets CFB on fire. Maybe Michael Penix, dunno. I think no matter what they will exercise the 5th year option on JL and even if he stinks on ice they have him under contract to trot out there while they draft and bring the next guy along. (I don't think JL will stink.)

Right now they need to focus on surrounding Love with a good OL and skill players, and acquiring as much young talent via Day 1-2 picks (or getting lucky on Day 3) while they unwind from their cap mess. By 2025 they should be in pretty good shape and if JL is any good they could have a window open for a strong playoff run. Starting now it's about developing young players into playmakers and shedding bad contracts.

[red]

so

the jets thought that a player who was in the league for 2 years and demanded to be traded after doing not so much in those 2 years was worth a high second round pick

but the QB who is one year removed from his 4th MVP and who everyone in new york thinks is the final piece to winning a super bowl isn't worth a 1st?

fuck the jets, take them to the fucking cleaners

i'll take their 2 second rounders, but i want a future 1st also if he plays more then 1 season

[Rastak]

so

the jets thought that a player who was in the league for 2 years and demanded to be traded after doing not so much in those 2 years was worth a high second round pick

but the QB who is one year removed from his 4th MVP and who everyone in new york thinks is the final piece to winning a super bowl isn't worth a 1st?

fuck the jets, take them to the fucking cleaners

i'll take their 2 second rounders, but i want a future 1st also if he plays more then 1 season

To play devils advocate, here is a 40yo that seemed to decline and has said publicly he had one foot in retirement this offseason. How much is realistic? It's tricky hence why it isn't done.

[MadScientist]

To play devils advocate, here is a 40yo that seemed to decline and has said publicly he had one foot in retirement this offseason. How much is realistic? It's tricky hence why it isn't done.

Yep, that's pretty much what the Pack-a-Day podcast was saying as well. Given the contract and the possibility of Rodgers not playing more than one year, normally that wouldn't bring much in return, but Rodgers has the potential to take the Jets from missing the playoffs to playing for the Super Bowl, and that's worth a lot. Both teams need this trade to go through so there isn't really much leverage either way.

[Rastak]

Yep, that's pretty much what the Pack-a-Day podcast was saying as well. Given the contract and the possibility of Rodgers not playing more than one year, normally that wouldn't bring much in return, but Rodgers has the potential to take the Jets from missing the playoffs to playing for the Super Bowl, and that's worth a lot. Both teams need this trade to go through so there isn't really much leverage either way.

I can't argue with any of that. All true.

[texaspackerbacker]

I'm going by what Rodgers said. You're the one that's been going on about what Rodgers and the Packers have been thinking. Hilarious.

What did I ever say that remotely was that? I said he's highly unlikely to walk away from $59 million. Is that what you have in mind?

[texaspackerbacker]

Yep, that's pretty much what the Pack-a-Day podcast was saying as well. Given the contract and the possibility of Rodgers not playing more than one year, normally that wouldn't bring much in return, but Rodgers has the potential to take the Jets from missing the playoffs to playing for the Super Bowl, and that's worth a lot. Both teams need this trade to go through so there isn't really much leverage either way.

Correct about what it means to the Jets, but the Packers need for it to NOT go through in order to not go right down the drain.

[sharpe1027]

What did I ever say that remotely was that? I said he's highly unlikely to walk away from $59 million. Is that what you have in mind?

-
I'm fairly sure Rodgers knows he's staying and the Packer brass know he is staying. Rodgers is just stringing along the media shitheads and anybody dumb enough to swallow the media shit.

I'm completely confident that I'm aligned with the thinking of the Packer brass on this topic -
--
I say again, Rodgers isn't gonna be traded, and he isn't gonna retire. If they did want to trade him - which they obviously don't, he wouldn't have much say about where he would go, except maybe to threaten retirement - which clearly would be throwing away so much money that it would be significant even to somebody as rich as he is. All of this trade talk is just ludicrous.

[texaspackerbacker]

-
I'm fairly sure Rodgers knows he's staying and the Packer brass know he is staying. Rodgers is just stringing along the media shitheads and anybody dumb enough to swallow the media shit.

I'm completely confident that I'm aligned with the thinking of the Packer brass on this topic -
--
I say again, Rodgers isn't gonna be traded, and he isn't gonna retire. If they did want to trade him - which they obviously don't, he wouldn't have much say about where he would go, except maybe to threaten retirement - which clearly would be throwing away so much money that it would be significant even to somebody as rich as he is. All of this trade talk is just ludicrous.

The most intelligent sounding post I've seen in here in quite a while hahahaha.

I already copped to being wrong - seemingly anyway - about the trade. Rodgers stringing along the media shitheads? I stand by that - he said as much.

[sharpe1027]

The most intelligent sounding post I've seen in here in quite a while hahahaha.

I already copped to being wrong - seemingly anyway - about the trade. Rodgers stringing along the media shitheads? I stand by that - he said as much.

You asked for examples of where you were claiming to know what Rodgers and the Packers were thinking. I provided them. You hypocritical shithead.

[Fritz]

You asked for examples of where you were claiming to know what Rodgers and the Packers were thinking. I provided them. You hypocritical shithead.

Sharpe, you know it's like arguing with a wall.

So let's get this back on track. Hey, Tex, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers, man? Rodgers said he wants to play for the Jets, and it's all done but the compensation, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers???

[RashanGary]

Sharpe, you know it's like arguing with a wall.

So let's get this back on track. Hey, Tex, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers, man? Rodgers said he wants to play for the Jets, and it's all done but the compensation, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers???

The goat who will play like a goat for 4-10 more years? Clearly 3 firsts and probably more.

[sharpe1027]

Sharpe, you know it's like arguing with a wall.

So let's get this back on track. Hey, Tex, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers, man? Rodgers said he wants to play for the Jets, and it's all done but the compensation, so what do you think the Packers will get for Rodgers???

Yeah. I know, but sometimes I can't help myself.

[sharpe1027]

The goat who will play like a goat for 4-10 more years? Clearly 3 firsts and probably more.

Per Tex, it's so obvious to anyone that's not a shithead Rodgers hater that he's going to play for 5 more years at a near MVP level. He's got to be worth more than that.

[texaspackerbacker]

Another excellent job of quoting hahahaha.