What do the Packers get for Aaron Rodgers?

[RashanGary]

So the JETS just acquired a 2nd round pick for E Moore, hopefully that is coming to us this year and we get the 1 next year

Picks 42 and 43 equal out to pick 17 on the trade value chart. Maybe they really want 13 and would give up the two seconds.

[sharpe1027]

Rodgers just isn't into you Tex. He doesn't want to be a Packer and the only way it happens he plays for them at this point is if he's just showing up and collecting a paycheck.

[Sparkey]

Getting two 2nds would be really nice. Three top 50 picks.

[RashanGary]

Getting two 2nds would be really nice. Three top 50 picks.

I think it would be 4. We have the 15 and 45 I believe and we’d add the 42 and 43. I kinda like that better than 13 anyway.

[MadtownPacker]

Rodgers just isn't into you Tex. He doesn't want to be a Packer and the only way it happens he plays for them at this point is if he's just showing up and collecting a paycheck.

He broke up with TPB for this:

[texaspackerbacker]

Rodgers just isn't into you Tex. He doesn't want to be a Packer and the only way it happens he plays for them at this point is if he's just showing up and collecting a paycheck.

And you're not a damn hater ...... yeah right.

Amazing how knownothings think they actually know what's in the guy's head.

[Bretsky]

Jets made a trade and now have picks 42 and 43. Could this be the trade for Rodgers?

Packers get pick #13, a Jets 2nd round pick, and next year's second in exchange for pick 17 and KAREN

[Fritz]

Packers get pick #13, a Jets 2nd round pick, and next year's second in exchange for pick 17 and KAREN

So, people, what would you prefer: Bretsky's scenario or the two Jets' second round picks as described earlier?

You want to move up a couple spots in the first and get an added second, or just have the two seconds?

[jklowan]

I would take the 2 seconds this year if there is another pick coming for next next year, preferably another 2nd

[Joemailman]

I think it's unlikely the Packers can get the 13th pick. Can't really blame the Jets for not wanting to give it up given the uncertainty of how long Rodgers will play. The fact that the Jets are apparently the only team interested in Rodgers hurts the Packers here.

[Sparkey]

I think it would be 4. We have the 15 and 45 I believe and we’d add the 42 and 43. I kinda like that better than 13 anyway.

You are correct RG, I completely forgot about their own 2nd.

[run pMc]

I would take the 2 seconds this year if there is another pick coming for next next year, preferably another 2nd

Agree. 2 R2 this year is good draft ammo. If they threw in next years R2 and put conditionals on it that's ok.
Rodgers the player is worth more, but Rodgers' contract and likely 1-2 year rental is probably not.

I think next year's draft will be better overall but there will be some good players available on Day 2 this year.

[sharpe1027]

And you're not a damn hater ...... yeah right.

Amazing how knownothings think they actually know what's in the guy's head.

I'm going by what Rodgers said. You're the one that's been going on about what Rodgers and the Packers have been thinking. Hilarious.

[RashanGary]

Agree. 2 R2 this year is good draft ammo. If they threw in next years R2 and put conditionals on it that's ok.
Rodgers the player is worth more, but Rodgers' contract and likely 1-2 year rental is probably not.

I think next year's draft will be better overall but there will be some good players available on Day 2 this year.

Next years round 1 would be nice too. I think it’s you who mentioned that if love stinks, having two firsts next year and a chance to move up in a good QB class is kind of ideal.

I know everyone is thinking we’re gonna get a haul, but I think pick 43 or next years first is about the best we can hope for.

[Fritz]

Next year's first, even if it's in the mid-twenties, would be a nice haul if they could add one of the Jets' second-rounders this year.