Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I'm buying beans again... and guns.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm buying beans again... and guns.

    I knew this Obama fellow was bad news. And now I have proof:

    Russian Professor Predicts Fall of U.S. in 2010
    Monday, December 29, 2008
    Wall Street Journal

    MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.

    In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

    Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.

    But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

    A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.

    "There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

    Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

    In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

    Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."

    Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

    Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

    The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."

    In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

    "When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

    At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.

    He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

    California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

    "It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.

    Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.

    Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

    The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

    For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

    The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.

    "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

  • #2
    Fuck that. Whyoming and Ohio are useless. Someone else can have them.

    Comment


    • #3
      Looks like you hometown folks are gonna be part of Canada. Enjoy the free healthcare.
      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

      Comment


      • #4
        Now Sarah Palin won't have to look out her window to see Russia. She'll be in Russia.
        I can't run no more
        With that lawless crowd
        While the killers in high places
        Say their prayers out loud
        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
        A thundercloud
        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

        Comment


        • #5
          theres was a game for the old xbox called shattered union that had a civil war scenario where the us split into groups

          and it was damn close to being split up the same way with even the same names

          this guys just ripping off a game

          Comment


          • #6
            The Ruski is a dumb fuck.....China already owns it all and will end up with all of the lower 48...but Alaska will go independent as it should have a long time ago.
            C.H.U.D.

            Comment


            • #7
              You mean you don't get free healthcare and Royal Mounties?
              "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

              Comment


              • #8
                i see it playing out more like this

                the south is convinced by their christian nazi leaders to split again. and we let them go, because what are they really good for? they drag our school stats down, they drag our average iq down, and they do nothing but preach at us.

                so we let the south go this time, and celebrations begin on both sides of the border

                the south then invades mexico, and enslaves the population, forcing them to build the bowie knifes, and tobacco they will need to invade canada.

                they invade canada in the late fall, not smart enough to bring warm cloths or 4-wheel drives, and their invasion quickly bogs down( much like the french and germans in russia). the starving, and freezing army of the south crosses the southern border of canada looking for warmth and more wiskey.

                some hillbilly walks into a bar in milwaukee and begs for a bottle of coors and a pack of winstons, and all hell breaks loose

                thus the start of the second war between noth and south

                Comment


                • #9
                  A big Yeah Right to that (the original)--yours has some possiblities, red.

                  This guy is some refugee from the old KGB, and thus, got his stinking Soviet ass kicked almost a generation ago.

                  The rest of the story, as Paul Harvey would say, is that the Texas Republic portion of this little Risk Game scenario takes over Mexico, takes the southern half of the Atlantic Republic (let the Eurowimps have the rest), recaptures the rest of the west--nuking China in the process, liberates the upper midwest, and goes on to take Canada too, negotiates the return of Alaska, obtaining the mineral rights to Siberia in the process, and agrees not to take military action against the Japs for their temporary occupation of Hawaii in return for reparations of one trillion dollars and turning over controlling interest in Toyota, Honda, and Nissan to GM, Ford, and Chrysler respectively.
                  What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You know Tex has a good point about being American. As much as we may hate each other, we, for the most part, hate everyone else more. Civil war or no, the country isn't going to be divvied up between the rest of the world. Well, maybe the other regions would agree to nuke the "euro" coast and start over, but otherwise I don't think Americans are going to instantaneously stop being American.
                    "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Good book if you are so inclined to this kind of published history....

                      The Battles of Sitka (1802 and 1804) were seminal events in the history of the Tlingit people, in the multicultural history of Alaska, and, ultimately, in the history of America. Anooshi Lingit Aani Ka / Russians in Tlingit America covers the period from the frist arrival of European and American fur traders in Tlingit territory to the establishment of a permanent Russian presence in the Pacific Northwest, presenting transcriptions and English translations of Tlingit oral traditions recorded almost fifty years ago and translations of newly available Russian historical documents. Although independent in origin and transmission, these accounts support one another to a remarkable degree on the main historical points. The Tlingit-Russian conflict is usually presented as a confrontation between "whites," with superior arms, and brave but outnumbered and poorly armed Natives. Northing could be further from the truth. The Tlingits saw themselves as victors even as they formally ceded to the Russian the site of their village and fort, now known as Sitka. Setting aside ancient rules of story ownership, a new generation of Tlingit clan leaders has decided to publish the stories told by their ancestors so that the Tlingit point of view would be known and succeeding generations would not forget their people's history. Including Russian historical documents, travelers' accounts of informal interactions between the formerly warring parties after the battles, and Dr. W. Schuhmacher's work on the role played by British and American skippers, Anooshi Lingit Aani Ka inquires into and provides some answers to the fundamental question, Who owns history? Photographs of objects now in Russian and American museums - from the favorite battle hammer of Tlingit war chief Katlian to the metal ceremonial hat Baranov commissioned for the peace ceremony - enrich the book, along with portraits of key historical figures and eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century charts of Tlingit territory. Also included is the journal of Dmitrii Tarkhanov, a gazetteer, a glossary, and Tlingit and Russian name lists.


                      If these battles turn another way the Hudson Bay company probably ends up with Alaska and it ends up part of Canada.
                      C.H.U.D.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        When was the last major world power that fell off the face of the earth in the matter of one year?

                        Granted, the US certainly could become much weaker in terms of global influence...think France in 1700 and France in 2008. However, the country is not going to break up and become parts of Russia, Canada...and Mexico?!?!

                        That is just fucking hilarious. :P :P Someone needs to get a new supply of vodka...the current batch must be tainted.
                        My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Anarchy is more likely than a realignment.

                          Rich white people will hire Mexicans to riot for them, not knowing how to do it themselves.
                          [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            anybody read "The Man in the High Castle" by Phillip K. Dick? It is about the United States being ruled by Japan and Germany after WWII. A little hard thinking about the 1950's being "the future". The Axis powers weren't so bad, certainly no worse than America during the Reagan years.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              You mean you don't get free healthcare and Royal Mounties?
                              Nothing is free in this world. The health care in Canada is "free" of talented physicians and quality drugs, if anything.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X