He.... Had.... Plenty.... Of.... Time.... To.... Throw....

[Harlan Huckleby]

sorry for being sensitive, but i hear that line often from various weenies.

[Rastak]

sorry for being sensitive, but i hear that line often from various weenies.

I think you should go back to being the happy bafoon!

(do you recall that line)?

[Harlan Huckleby]

yes, that rings a bell.

[falco]

yes, that rings a bell.

you know what rings a bell for me harlan??? back on JSO when you told me I was the one poster who contributed nothing to the forum, then later claimed LJ hacked your account...i've never forgotten my friend

[Harlan Huckleby]

Well, I wasn;t lying, because I was LJ.

[Rastak]

yes, that rings a bell.

Not sure why I remember that but someone said on JSO you should stop offering serious commentary since you know nothing and should go back to being funny and you said something like" Oh sure, I'll just be the happy bafoon".

[Harlan Huckleby]

it's true that I know less than most about football.

[cpk1994]

it's true that I know less than most about football.

If it makes you feel any better, you are still miles ahead of Woody and Merlin.

[Partial]

it's true that I know less than most about football.

If it makes you feel any better, you are still miles ahead of Woody and Merlin.

This is bs. Stop. Why take a blatant attack when they aren't even referenced? I know I'm guilty of it myself, and we all need to stop this. There is no need for it.

[BallHawk]

Well, I wasn;t lying, because I was LJ.

WHAT???????????

[HarveyWallbangers]

Since 2000, here's the Packers pre-season verses regular season records:
2000 (2-2) vs. (9-7)
2001 (2-2) vs. (12-4)
2002 (3-1) vs. (12-4)
2003 (2-3) vs. (10-6)
2004 (1-3) vs. (10-6)
2005 (2-2) vs. (4-12)
2006 (1-3) vs. (8-8)
2007 (2-2) vs. (13-3)

Since 2000, only one year ('02) were the Packers better than .500 during preseason. Packers were 1-3 twice ('04 and '06).

You even missed this:

1999 (4-0) vs. (8-8) with Ray Rhodes.

I learned a long time ago that preseason doesn't mean a whole lot. You can evaluate individual players, but the rest is a grand scheme by the NFL owners to line their pocketbooks. I think I learned it's meaningless after the Bills went winless a couple of times in the preseason when they were making their 4 consecutive Super Bowl appearances. We go through this every year, win or lose. Don't get too high when they look good in the preseason. Don't get too low when they look bad.

[GrnBay007]

it's true that I know less than most about football.

If it makes you feel any better, you are still miles ahead of Woody and Merlin.

This is bs. Stop. Why take a blatant attack when they aren't even referenced? I know I'm guilty of it myself, and we all need to stop this. There is no need for it.

You are right Partial. No need to attack or insult anyone for their views. Simply agree to disagree in a respectable manner.

[Freak Out]

Since 2000, here's the Packers pre-season verses regular season records:
2000 (2-2) vs. (9-7)
2001 (2-2) vs. (12-4)
2002 (3-1) vs. (12-4)
2003 (2-3) vs. (10-6)
2004 (1-3) vs. (10-6)
2005 (2-2) vs. (4-12)
2006 (1-3) vs. (8-8)
2007 (2-2) vs. (13-3)

Since 2000, only one year ('02) were the Packers better than .500 during preseason. Packers were 1-3 twice ('04 and '06).

You even missed this:

1999 (4-0) vs. (8-8) with Ray Rhodes.

I learned a long time ago that preseason doesn't mean a whole lot. You can evaluate individual players, but the rest is a grand scheme by the NFL owners to line their pocketbooks. I think I learned it's meaningless after the Bills went winless a couple of times in the preseason when they were making their 4 consecutive Super Bowl appearances. We go through this every year, win or lose. Don't get too high when they look good in the preseason. Don't get too low when they look bad.

No injuries. That's the key...working the kinks out without getting people killed. Record means zilch. Were there any this game?

[Zool]

it's true that I know less than most about football.

If it makes you feel any better, you are still miles ahead of Woody and Merlin.

This is bs. Stop. Why take a blatant attack when they aren't even referenced? I know I'm guilty of it myself, and we all need to stop this. There is no need for it.

You are right Partial. No need to attack or insult anyone for their views. Simply agree to disagree in a respectable manner.

NO MORE JOKES!

[LL2]

I'm surprised they didn't have Arod roll-out more often, just to give the rushers something to think about. He throws well on the run. Maybe they wanted to limit game film for other teams to watch.


There were a couple plays where Arod held on to the ball too long. Mostly I think the WHOLE pocket was collapsing so fast he didn't even have a throwing lane.

Arod is not a polished QB, he never started an NFL game in his life. We have to put up with a learning curve, and hope he is good enough to win.

There will be a learning curve and I'm sure most expect one. I wonder how many remember the stinker's Favre had during his first few years, and he had plenty. Many wanted him yanked back in the early 90's. The M3/Rodgers relationship is very similar to the Holmgren/Favre relationship. Holmgren stuck by Favre sink or swim in Favre's early years. I even recall articles stating that by Holmgren and Favre. Hopefully the current coach/QB relationship will produce another 1 or 2 SB wins in the next 5-6 years.