Cutler to the Bears

[Iron Mike]

[Iron Mike]

He is a Bear troll. Bear trolls don't know the meaning of the word logic.

Yous Wackers wont have a chance this yeer.


BEAR DOWN PISS ANDMOLD CLOWNS!!!!!!one!!!!

[The Shadow]

It will be amusing to watch the realization among the Bear Faithful unfold that the addition of Cutler (and the hamstringing of the next 2 drafts) does not miraculously vault the Bears into some kind of prominence.
Bear fans are always worthy of a chuckle.

[sheepshead]

Theyre thinking they have MJ , Sosa and Gale Sayers in pads down here.

[Guiness]

Man, I'm gonna love taking Packer fans money this year. Place the bets when you are ready ladies and gents...lol.

Careful what you wish for! Looking at recent history, I don't know if you want your squad to be beating the Packers this year

When the Pack went 13-3, who were the losses to? 2 to the Bears.
The last time the Bears went 13-3 (1999) who tagged them twice? Yup, Packers!

I know Lovie made his famous quote on Letterman about nothing mattering about beating the Pack, but at what cost?

[cpk1994]

He is a Bear troll. Bear trolls don't know the meaning of the word logic.

Yous Packers wont have a chance this yeer.


BEAR DOWN PISS ANDMOLD CLOWNS!!!!!!one!!!!

So thats what your mom's basement looks like. I see you have gone with a 1980's motif. YOu still get porn on laserdisc too?

[Iron Mike]

It will be amusing to watch the realization among the Bear Faithful unfold that the addition of Cutler (and the hamstringing of the next 2 drafts) does not miraculously vault the Bears into some kind of prominence.
Bear fans are always worthy of a chuckle.

Cutler: vs. Oakland/Kansas City 5-3
Orton: vs. Oakland/Kansas City 0-0

Cutler: vs. Detroit 0-1
Orton: vs. Detroit 4-0

Cutler: vs. playoff teams 3-9
Orton: vs. playoff teams 6-6

Cutler: post season 0-0
Orton: post season 0-1

Cutler: vs teams with a .500 or better winning percentage 9-12
Orton: vs teams with a .500 or better winning percentage 9-11

Cutler: AFC West 6-7
Orton: AFC West 0-0

Cutler: NFC North 1-3
Orton: NFC North 9-5

Cutler: vs AFC 12-14
Orton: vs. AFC 3-4

Cutler: vs. NFC 5-6
Orton: vs. NFC 18-8


I fail to see any sort of amazing upgrade.

[Dabaddestbear]

Cutler is a nice addition for the Bears, but he is not going to make the huge difference many Chicago fans believe. Orton was really looked down upon as mediocre, but in reality he was a very smart, workmanlike player who was greatly respected by his fellow players.
Cutler is going to be much more hit & miss, and I look forward to the first time he screws up (and that may well be opening night!) when radio hosts Doug Buffone, Ed O'Bradovich - and Bear Nation begins roasting their new savior.
Also : the lost draft choices are going to be hamstringing the Bears not only for the next two years, but longer, as they feel the effects of less quality roster additions.
Nothing to get overly concerned with in the NFC North; the Packers still look like the most balanced team.

The best roster additions for the Bears over the past several years have come from 2nd round picks and later. And you speak as if they mortgaged their future in the trade. They gave up 3 picks over two years and got 1 back. They still have 8 picks in this years draft alone!!
Better yet, tell me how have the first round picks over the past years been for the Bears, and after that tell me how any of them equal to the value of a franchise QB?

If that really is the case; I suggest the Bears "give" the Packers their 1st round pick every year because the Bears suck at it. Not one GM in the league would rather have an extra 5th round pick for a 1st. This years draft is very deep and has the potential for a very good top 50+ picks. I'm glad the Bears will only have one pick in that window.

Would you give up Greg Olsen, Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

How about Willie Gault, the fridge, Jim McMahon or Walter Payton from the past?

Yeah, those first rounders suck!!!

Hey Kool-Aid man slow down and read...
I SAID that any GM would give up those first round picks for a franchise ProBowl QB. Now you can try and twist my words, but the quote is there.

And your quote will be the one I will use to point out how many 1st rounders flop in the upcoming years from this draft. And most importantly any one the Packers pick in the 1st.

[Dabaddestbear]

Man, I'm gonna love taking Packer fans money this year. Place the bets when you are ready ladies and gents...lol.

Careful what you wish for! Looking at recent history, I don't know if you want your squad to be beating the Packers this year

When the Pack went 13-3, who were the losses to? 2 to the Bears.
The last time the Bears went 13-3 (1999) who tagged them twice? Yup, Packers!

I know Lovie made his famous quote on Letterman about nothing mattering about beating the Pack, but at what cost?

You know what...you made a good point there.....Hey Viking and Kitty Fans where are ya?!!!

[ThunderDan]

Wow what insightful posts.

[ThunderDan]

Cutler is a nice addition for the Bears, but he is not going to make the huge difference many Chicago fans believe. Orton was really looked down upon as mediocre, but in reality he was a very smart, workmanlike player who was greatly respected by his fellow players.
Cutler is going to be much more hit & miss, and I look forward to the first time he screws up (and that may well be opening night!) when radio hosts Doug Buffone, Ed O'Bradovich - and Bear Nation begins roasting their new savior.
Also : the lost draft choices are going to be hamstringing the Bears not only for the next two years, but longer, as they feel the effects of less quality roster additions.
Nothing to get overly concerned with in the NFC North; the Packers still look like the most balanced team.

The best roster additions for the Bears over the past several years have come from 2nd round picks and later. And you speak as if they mortgaged their future in the trade. They gave up 3 picks over two years and got 1 back. They still have 8 picks in this years draft alone!!
Better yet, tell me how have the first round picks over the past years been for the Bears, and after that tell me how any of them equal to the value of a franchise QB?

If that really is the case; I suggest the Bears "give" the Packers their 1st round pick every year because the Bears suck at it. Not one GM in the league would rather have an extra 5th round pick for a 1st. This years draft is very deep and has the potential for a very good top 50+ picks. I'm glad the Bears will only have one pick in that window.

Would you give up Greg Olsen, Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

How about Willie Gault, the fridge, Jim McMahon or Walter Payton from the past?

Yeah, those first rounders suck!!!

Hey Kool-Aid man slow down and read...
I SAID that any GM would give up those first round picks for a franchise ProBowl QB. Now you can try and twist my words, but the quote is there.

And your quote will be the one I will use to point out how many 1st rounders flop in the upcoming years from this draft. And most importantly any one the Packers pick in the 1st.

Kool-Aid that's funny.... for a 4th grader.

How about we use real stats and not something you believe in your head which isn't true.

You state the Bears have done much better with picks from the 2nd round on. I'm sure you would be happy to give up Urlacher than.

In the last 5 years the Bears have had 42 draft picks of which 4 of them were in the first round. That's less than 10% of the Bears total picks.

The Bears picked Chris Williams, who you go on about how he will be a stud, Greg Olsen, Cedrick Benson and Tommie Harris. I'd say the Bears are batting 75%. That is much higher than any other round they have picked in.

[Dabaddestbear]

Cutler is a nice addition for the Bears, but he is not going to make the huge difference many Chicago fans believe. Orton was really looked down upon as mediocre, but in reality he was a very smart, workmanlike player who was greatly respected by his fellow players.
Cutler is going to be much more hit & miss, and I look forward to the first time he screws up (and that may well be opening night!) when radio hosts Doug Buffone, Ed O'Bradovich - and Bear Nation begins roasting their new savior.
Also : the lost draft choices are going to be hamstringing the Bears not only for the next two years, but longer, as they feel the effects of less quality roster additions.
Nothing to get overly concerned with in the NFC North; the Packers still look like the most balanced team.

The best roster additions for the Bears over the past several years have come from 2nd round picks and later. And you speak as if they mortgaged their future in the trade. They gave up 3 picks over two years and got 1 back. They still have 8 picks in this years draft alone!!
Better yet, tell me how have the first round picks over the past years been for the Bears, and after that tell me how any of them equal to the value of a franchise QB?

If that really is the case; I suggest the Bears "give" the Packers their 1st round pick every year because the Bears suck at it. Not one GM in the league would rather have an extra 5th round pick for a 1st. This years draft is very deep and has the potential for a very good top 50+ picks. I'm glad the Bears will only have one pick in that window.

Would you give up Greg Olsen, Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

How about Willie Gault, the fridge, Jim McMahon or Walter Payton from the past?

Yeah, those first rounders suck!!!

Hey Kool-Aid man slow down and read...
I SAID that any GM would give up those first round picks for a franchise ProBowl QB. Now you can try and twist my words, but the quote is there.

And your quote will be the one I will use to point out how many 1st rounders flop in the upcoming years from this draft. And most importantly any one the Packers pick in the 1st.

Kool-Aid that's funny.... for a 4th grader.

How about we use real stats and not something you believe in your head which isn't true.

You state the Bears have done much better with picks from the 2nd round on. I'm sure you would be happy to give up Urlacher than.

In the last 5 years the Bears have had 42 draft picks of which 4 of them were in the first round. That's less than 10% of the Bears total picks.

The Bears picked Chris Williams, who you go on about how he will be a stud, Greg Olsen, Cedrick Benson and Tommie Harris. I'd say the Bears are batting 75%. That is much higher than any other round they have picked in.

Why only do a 5 year span then buddy?
The fact remains that there is no QB in this Draft or next that will make an immediate impact like Cutler. And for a team that needed a QB like forever EVERYONE except Packer fans and some disgruntled Bronco fans says it was a VERY good deal for the Bears. You looking for a sour spot in a sweet apple pie...not possible. Lets just see how you guys draft picks that you like to stockpile each year works out for ya.

[ThunderDan]

Cutler is a nice addition for the Bears, but he is not going to make the huge difference many Chicago fans believe. Orton was really looked down upon as mediocre, but in reality he was a very smart, workmanlike player who was greatly respected by his fellow players.
Cutler is going to be much more hit & miss, and I look forward to the first time he screws up (and that may well be opening night!) when radio hosts Doug Buffone, Ed O'Bradovich - and Bear Nation begins roasting their new savior.
Also : the lost draft choices are going to be hamstringing the Bears not only for the next two years, but longer, as they feel the effects of less quality roster additions.
Nothing to get overly concerned with in the NFC North; the Packers still look like the most balanced team.

The best roster additions for the Bears over the past several years have come from 2nd round picks and later. And you speak as if they mortgaged their future in the trade. They gave up 3 picks over two years and got 1 back. They still have 8 picks in this years draft alone!!
Better yet, tell me how have the first round picks over the past years been for the Bears, and after that tell me how any of them equal to the value of a franchise QB?

If that really is the case; I suggest the Bears "give" the Packers their 1st round pick every year because the Bears suck at it. Not one GM in the league would rather have an extra 5th round pick for a 1st. This years draft is very deep and has the potential for a very good top 50+ picks. I'm glad the Bears will only have one pick in that window.

Would you give up Greg Olsen, Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

How about Willie Gault, the fridge, Jim McMahon or Walter Payton from the past?

Yeah, those first rounders suck!!!

Hey Kool-Aid man slow down and read...
I SAID that any GM would give up those first round picks for a franchise ProBowl QB. Now you can try and twist my words, but the quote is there.

And your quote will be the one I will use to point out how many 1st rounders flop in the upcoming years from this draft. And most importantly any one the Packers pick in the 1st.

Kool-Aid that's funny.... for a 4th grader.

How about we use real stats and not something you believe in your head which isn't true.

You state the Bears have done much better with picks from the 2nd round on. I'm sure you would be happy to give up Urlacher than.

In the last 5 years the Bears have had 42 draft picks of which 4 of them were in the first round. That's less than 10% of the Bears total picks.

The Bears picked Chris Williams, who you go on about how he will be a stud, Greg Olsen, Cedrick Benson and Tommie Harris. I'd say the Bears are batting 75%. That is much higher than any other round they have picked in.

Why only do a 5 year span then buddy?
The fact remains that there is no QB in this Draft or next that will make an immediate impact like Cutler. And for a team that needed a QB like forever EVERYONE except Packer fans and some disgruntled Bronco fans says it was a VERY good deal for the Bears. You looking for a sour spot in a sweet apple pie...not possible. Lets just see how you guys draft picks that you like to stockpile each year works out for ya.

I stopped there because 2/3 of the Bears roster are players with 5 or less years of experience.

[Dabaddestbear]

Cutler is a nice addition for the Bears, but he is not going to make the huge difference many Chicago fans believe. Orton was really looked down upon as mediocre, but in reality he was a very smart, workmanlike player who was greatly respected by his fellow players.
Cutler is going to be much more hit & miss, and I look forward to the first time he screws up (and that may well be opening night!) when radio hosts Doug Buffone, Ed O'Bradovich - and Bear Nation begins roasting their new savior.
Also : the lost draft choices are going to be hamstringing the Bears not only for the next two years, but longer, as they feel the effects of less quality roster additions.
Nothing to get overly concerned with in the NFC North; the Packers still look like the most balanced team.

The best roster additions for the Bears over the past several years have come from 2nd round picks and later. And you speak as if they mortgaged their future in the trade. They gave up 3 picks over two years and got 1 back. They still have 8 picks in this years draft alone!!
Better yet, tell me how have the first round picks over the past years been for the Bears, and after that tell me how any of them equal to the value of a franchise QB?

If that really is the case; I suggest the Bears "give" the Packers their 1st round pick every year because the Bears suck at it. Not one GM in the league would rather have an extra 5th round pick for a 1st. This years draft is very deep and has the potential for a very good top 50+ picks. I'm glad the Bears will only have one pick in that window.

Would you give up Greg Olsen, Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

How about Willie Gault, the fridge, Jim McMahon or Walter Payton from the past?

Yeah, those first rounders suck!!!

Hey Kool-Aid man slow down and read...
I SAID that any GM would give up those first round picks for a franchise ProBowl QB. Now you can try and twist my words, but the quote is there.

And your quote will be the one I will use to point out how many 1st rounders flop in the upcoming years from this draft. And most importantly any one the Packers pick in the 1st.

Kool-Aid that's funny.... for a 4th grader.

How about we use real stats and not something you believe in your head which isn't true.

You state the Bears have done much better with picks from the 2nd round on. I'm sure you would be happy to give up Urlacher than.

In the last 5 years the Bears have had 42 draft picks of which 4 of them were in the first round. That's less than 10% of the Bears total picks.

The Bears picked Chris Williams, who you go on about how he will be a stud, Greg Olsen, Cedrick Benson and Tommie Harris. I'd say the Bears are batting 75%. That is much higher than any other round they have picked in.

Why only do a 5 year span then buddy?
The fact remains that there is no QB in this Draft or next that will make an immediate impact like Cutler. And for a team that needed a QB like forever EVERYONE except Packer fans and some disgruntled Bronco fans says it was a VERY good deal for the Bears. You looking for a sour spot in a sweet apple pie...not possible. Lets just see how you guys draft picks that you like to stockpile each year works out for ya.

I stopped there because 2/3 of the Bears roster are players with 5 or less years of experience.

That cant be true the way most on here is always screaming about how old the Bears team is...lol.
But the reason why that could be so is because most of our draft picks have not been sticking to the team lately. Hence, the good reason to trade a few picks away for a very young probowl QB. Less risk at unproven talent, in return for immediate reward from very proven talent. Fair exchange is no Robbery.

[ThunderDan]

Maybe the reason is because the average NFL career is a little over 3 seasons per the NFLPA website.