Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arod is a Loser. Stats Do Not Lie.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Tony Oday
    Originally posted by rbaloha
    Originally posted by Partial
    Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
    Premature at this stage. Although Flynn reminds of Hasselbeck.
    an injured middle of the road QB that never won a thing?
    Trade bait for a draft pick.
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by rbaloha
      A-rod's superb fantasy stats mean nothing until winning meaningful games starting with the Cowboys.
      Please tell us which QB with terrible stats you would prefer?
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Partial
        Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
        Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by pbmax
          Originally posted by Partial
          Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
          Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
          Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
          No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Smidgeon
            Originally posted by pbmax
            Originally posted by Partial
            Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
            Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
            Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
            ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

            I'm not an ARod hater.

            True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Partial
              Originally posted by Smidgeon
              Originally posted by pbmax
              Originally posted by Partial
              Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
              Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
              Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
              ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

              I'm not an ARod hater.

              True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
              So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by pbmax
                Originally posted by Partial
                Originally posted by Smidgeon
                Originally posted by pbmax
                Originally posted by Partial
                Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
                Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
                Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
                ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

                I'm not an ARod hater.

                True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
                So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
                I just hope Flynn is good enough to get good trade value.
                No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pbmax
                  Originally posted by Partial
                  Originally posted by Smidgeon
                  Originally posted by pbmax
                  Originally posted by Partial
                  Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
                  Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
                  Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
                  ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

                  I'm not an ARod hater.

                  True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
                  So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
                  I was making a joke bro.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by pbmax
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by Smidgeon
                    Originally posted by pbmax
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
                    Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
                    Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
                    ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

                    I'm not an ARod hater.

                    True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
                    So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
                    I was making a joke bro.
                    No you weren't. You've stated before that we should trade ARod to a "sucker".
                    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by rbaloha
                      A-rod's superb fantasy stats mean nothing until winning meaningful games starting with the Cowboys.

                      The opener against our rival was a meaningful game.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Originally posted by pbmax
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Originally posted by Smidgeon
                        Originally posted by pbmax
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
                        Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
                        Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
                        ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

                        I'm not an ARod hater.

                        True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
                        So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
                        I was making a joke bro.
                        No you weren't. You've stated before that we should trade ARod to a "sucker".
                        Source?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                          Originally posted by Partial
                          Originally posted by pbmax
                          Originally posted by Partial
                          Originally posted by Smidgeon
                          Originally posted by pbmax
                          Originally posted by Partial
                          Snake I've been saying this all along. I'm all for trading him (to a sucker) while his value is high and moving on into the next great era of the G&G, the Matt Flynn era.
                          Until you change your mind in three weeks that he is playing better. Then you will be saying all along that he had greatness in him.
                          Or until Flynn starts playing (for whatever reason) and sucks it up hardcore.
                          ARod is playing decent, not great, but decent. He'd be playing well if he held the ball for less time.

                          I'm not an ARod hater.

                          True statement about Flynn. We have no idea how he turns out but I have a hunch and a hope he's a stud.
                          So it is your contention that we should trade the starter on a hunch that the backup is better?
                          I was making a joke bro.
                          No you weren't. You've stated before that we should trade ARod to a "sucker".
                          It's all clear to me now. Think Andy Kaufman.
                          When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by denverYooper
                            It's all clear to me now. Think Andy Kaufman.
                            Except Partial expects us all to know when his absurdity is real or feigned.
                            "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by SkinBasket
                              Originally posted by denverYooper
                              It's all clear to me now. Think Andy Kaufman.
                              Except Partial expects us all to know when his absurdity is real or feigned.


                              Who would like to play the role of Jerry Lawler? Anyone?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Partial
                                Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                                No you weren't. You've stated before that we should trade ARod to a "sucker".
                                Source?
                                Some poster named Partial was the source. I clearly remember reading it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X