WHICH QUATERBACK PLAYS PLAYS ON THE GREEN BAY PACKERS TEAM LONGER ??

[bobblehead]

No argument there, but Brady always had a different mindset than Rodgers - maybe the primary reason Rodgers is a better QB past, present, and future. Rodgers could be playing at age 50 and not throw picks like what Brady did. Brady did play pretty damn good, though, which many including I did not expect this past season.

Maybe the reason that Brady has Rings that won't fit on one hand and Rodgers has one shiny bauble.

[texaspackerbacker]

Maybe because we had Ted Thompson as GM and Belichick or whoever made the decisions at New England built a better supporting cast.

[bobblehead]

Wilson may not be Aaron Rodgers, but he made Seattle great. If they lose him without getting somebody great in return, they will not even be a winning team within the next 2 or even 4 or 5 seasons.

Did he make seattle great? Or did he ride a great roster to an Owl as a game manager.

Russell circa 2013: 257 407 63.1 3,357 8.2 26 9 101.2
Marshawn Lynch...same deal: 301 1,257 4.2 43 12 36 316 8.8
Seattle D....same deal: 8th best DVOA EVER!

[RashanGary]

Love is consistent throwing from a broken pocket off platform. He's consistent from a stable platform. He needs to improve consistency throwing from the run. If he gets a little better in all areas, hes mahommes and Rodgers.

[Fritz]

Maybe because we had Ted Thompson as GM and Belichick or whoever made the decisions at New England built a better supporting cast.

Then Brady left and the great supporting cast couldn't support a mouse's nuts.

[RashanGary]

Love is consistent throwing from a broken pocket off platform. He's consistent from a stable platform. He needs to improve consistency throwing from the run. If he gets a little better in all areas, hes mahommes and Rodgers.

That's why you spend a 1 on him, that and he's a ferocious competitor likely to improve through his grind. They have an A+ prospect in Jordan Love

[RashanGary]

The only player in recent years that showed significantly better arm talent from all platforms was Daniel Jones. That kid is a star!

[Bretsky]

That's why you spend a 1 on him, that and he's a ferocious competitor likely to improve through his grind. They have an A+ prospect in Jordan Love

I've listened to a lot of GB reporters who cover GB so I HAVE TO ASK

WHERE are you getting this "ferocious compeitor" stand from ?????

[Bretsky]

Love is consistent throwing from a broken pocket off platform. He's consistent from a stable platform. He needs to improve consistency throwing from the run. If he gets a little better in all areas, hes mahommes and Rodgers.

This is signature worthy to see if you are right down the road......and you've been right about a lot of shit so I hope you are here too. I'm adding it

[RashanGary]

I've listened to a lot of GB reporters who cover GB so I HAVE TO ASK

WHERE are you getting this "ferocious compeitor" stand from ?????

Watching him play football

[RashanGary]

I watched Love vs LSU (I believe that was the top team he played) and he never gave up. Threw some amazing throws under constant pressure. He's a competitor on tape and high character guy by reputation. 41 year old Rodgers or 24 year old Love..... Wait one.more year, make sure he's what you think he is, but I'm going with the 24 year old if they like his development. Rodgers has three more years. It's just enough time to get him.into his 40s, fully develop Love and then negotiate with Love under the franchise tag after year 5. This can go smoothly.

[RashanGary]

Literally the Packers could develop Love for 4 years, still have him on the 5th year option and then franchise tag him for two years. They have more than enough time to let Rodgers play out his deal AND decide if they want Love long term before they invest long term. It's a really good qb situation.

[RashanGary]

One year early but still in the window of ideal QB transition.

[Bretsky]

[QUOTE=RashanGary;1087580]Watching him play football[/QUOTE


OK: I thought you had more. It could be argued after watching most QB's there are great competitors.

I was listening to Wilde and Tauscher last week and they noted impressions they had from interviews. They prefaced it by saying it's no fair to draw the whole picture since last year they didn't have a ton of interaction with players so it was Zoom interview. But they noted Favre and Rodgers always had a presence in front of the cameras and Love lacked that aura. Again it really doesn't mean a lot as it was just their first impression.

[call_me_ishmael]

I personally think it is far more likely that Jordan Love busts then becomes a star but that's just probability talking.