NAIL IS IN THE COFFIN

[RashanGary]

Nutz, you don't have to criticize others opinions to make yoru points. If they're good enough they'll stand on their own. That is a tactic of someone who's affraid to argue the points.


To the points, Rodgers played better than Favre last preseason adn better in the Dallas game when he took over. Rodgers looked poised, ready and maybe the best player on the field if you go by the 3 quarters that he did play.

Say what you will, but the Packers have more than 4 preseason games and one game that he ouplayed Brett in. They have years of practice and years of coaching/personnel experience. 95% of my opinino comes because I think they know what they're doing and know what a QB is supposed to look like and 5% comes from the fact that he outperformed Brett ever time he was given a chance last year.

Argue the points without the name calling and we can go somewhere. Shwo me why you think MM is unqualified to make this type of decison. Show me how TT is unqualified to make this type of decision. Show me that Rodgers ddin't play great last year. All are relevant points and all point to the possiblity that Rodgers could be everything Favre was last year. You don't even want to consider it though. LIke I said, when it happens I'll be happy to have a conversation as to why I saw it coming but you'll probably back track and give credit to the WR's, GRant, Jackson and the improved line.

[Harlan Huckleby]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

Could you be full of any more shit? I don't think so.

The packers have absolutely no ability to black-ball Favre. That is silly propaganda.

[GrnBay007]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

That appears to be the TT way........at least so far.

You don't want him, release him!!!

[Deputy Nutz]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

Could you be full of any more shit? I don't think so.

The packers have absolutely no ability to black-ball Favre. That is silly propaganda.

Why are you even talking football there is an election in three months.

Well lets answer your stupid little question, how can they black ball him. Refuse to let him compete as for a starting position with their team, and then refuse to trade him or release him. Sit on him until he has no other choice but to go away. Sure the Commish could get involved like Tags did with the Owens situation years ago, but I think that is a very slim chance.

[Harlan Huckleby]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

That appears to be the TT way........at least so far.

You don't want him, release him!!!

you have really drunk deeply of the Favre kool aide.

It is not practical to release him. They are going to trade him or keep him on the roster.


BTW, I don't recall you being in favor of granting Javon Walker an unconditional release when he felt unloved and unhappy.

[RashanGary]

They hoped he would stay retired, but now that he is not they'll do the right thing. They're not going to release him but if a team other than Minny and Chicago want him they'll find a way to get him his wish. If Minny or Chicago want him then he's stuck and probably shouldn't have signed the contract because the Packers do have a job to do that involves beating teh Vikings and Bears.

[RashanGary]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

Could you be full of any more shit? I don't think so.

The packers have absolutely no ability to black-ball Favre. That is silly propaganda.

Why are you even talking football there is an election in three months.

Well lets answer your stupid little question, how can they black ball him. Refuse to let him compete as for a starting position with their team, and then refuse to trade him or release him. Sit on him until he has no other choice but to go away. Sure the Commish could get involved like Tags did with the Owens situation years ago, but I think that is a very slim chance.

When did they ever refuse to trade him? When did they ever say he could'nt compete for a job?

[Deputy Nutz]

So instead you black ball him from playing?

Could you be full of any more shit? I don't think so.

The packers have absolutely no ability to black-ball Favre. That is silly propaganda.

Why are you even talking football there is an election in three months.

Well lets answer your stupid little question, how can they black ball him. Refuse to let him compete as for a starting position with their team, and then refuse to trade him or release him. Sit on him until he has no other choice but to go away. Sure the Commish could get involved like Tags did with the Owens situation years ago, but I think that is a very slim chance.

When did they ever refuse to trade him? When did they ever say he could'nt compete for a job?

there has been no mention of a trade or opening up competition for him as the starter.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Well lets answer your stupid little question, how can they black ball him. Refuse to let him compete as for a starting position with their team, and then refuse to trade him or release him. Sit on him until he has no other choice but to go away.

This is a funny definition of a "black ball": pay somebody 12M dollars to sit on your bench, then treat them like shit so they become a team cancer.

Wish somebody would black ball me! And I'm not talking about interracial sex.

The scenario you paint is totally ridiculous, counter productive for the team, and not going to happen.

[RashanGary]

When did they say the wouldn't trade him? When did they say they wouldn't let him compete?


Use your head, Nutz. Sometimes it works better than your heart.

[GrnBay007]

They hoped he would stay retired, but now that he is not they'll do the right thing. They're not going to release him but if a team other than Minny and Chicago want him they'll find a way to get him his wish. If Minny or Chicago want him then he's stuck and probably shouldn't have signed the contract because the Packers do have a job to do that involves beating teh Vikings and Bears.

They hoped he would stay retired........well, sorry, their dreams didn't come true. If they don't want him, which would mean they believe Rodgers is BETTER, then why would they object to ANY team getting him? Rodgers is the man, according to Packer management, why would they fear BF with the Bears or Vikings would be a threat???????

They don't want him.....let him go.

[Harlan Huckleby]

They hoped he would stay retired, but now that he is not they'll do the right thing. They're not going to release him but if a team other than Minny and Chicago want him they'll find a way to get him his wish. If Minny or Chicago want him then he's stuck and probably shouldn't have signed the contract because the Packers do have a job to do that involves beating teh Vikings and Bears.

They hoped he would stay retired........well, sorry, their dreams didn't come true. If they don't want him, which would mean they believe Rodgers is BETTER, then why would they object to ANY team getting him? Rodgers is the man, according to Packer management, why would they fear BF with the Bears or Vikings would be a threat???????

They don't want him.....let him go.

Again, why weren't you in favor of granting Javon Walker an unconditional release?

[RashanGary]

In one of the internet Greta reports they said they asked Favre what teams he wanted to be traded to. Maybe it's in part two. Not that it even matters because I think this whole blackballing thing is makebelieve anyway, but if they asked that then there really is no doubt (not that common sense shouldn't have alleviated it anyway)

[GrnBay007]

Again, why weren't you in favor of granting Javon Walker an unconditional release?

The whole Walker thing was about MONEY. Have we heard Favre mention ANYTHING about money? NO................he just wants to PLAY. Damn, I never thought I'd hear Packer fans complain about a HOF QB just want to play and be REJECTED. Friends/relatives have called.....even BEAR fans, and said what the hell is going on in GB that they don't want Favre. It's really not that complicated.

[RashanGary]

They hoped he would stay retired, but now that he is not they'll do the right thing. They're not going to release him but if a team other than Minny and Chicago want him they'll find a way to get him his wish. If Minny or Chicago want him then he's stuck and probably shouldn't have signed the contract because the Packers do have a job to do that involves beating teh Vikings and Bears.

They hoped he would stay retired........well, sorry, their dreams didn't come true. If they don't want him, which would mean they believe Rodgers is BETTER, then why would they object to ANY team getting him? Rodgers is the man, according to Packer management, why would they fear BF with the Bears or Vikings would be a threat???????

They don't want him.....let him go.

It's a buisness. If he has value they are going to get it and he's also a good QB. TT called him a first team all pro that can play for a couple three years more. He's obviously not chickenshit, they just moved forward with their starting QB position. Why not release Brady Poppinga or James JOnes. They're not starting either and I'm sure they just want to play too.