Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WHICH QUATERBACK PLAYS PLAYS ON THE GREEN BAY PACKERS TEAM LONGER ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    Brady keeps winning Super Bowls at $25M/year, and Rodgers apparently (according to Bretsky) is clamoring for more than the $35M/year he already is making.
    Rodgers isn't married to a billionaire, though.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
      Rodgers isn't married to a billionaire, though.
      Rodgers has already earned around $250,000,000 in his career. He's not hurting for cash.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
        You can give Rodgers more money and extend things out to make sense. That could be good for GB as well as Aaron Rodgers
        Perhaps...but I don't think this is going to provide enough cap space to do anything worthwhile. Rodgers will finish his career with fewer Super Bowl appearances than Favre.

        Jones is gone. The pick of Dillon last year basically guaranteed that. RBs typically only have one shot at a mega deal, so Jones will go for max $$$. I can't blame him. His career could end on the first play of next season. Teams who pay top dollar to RBs usually don't get a good return, so I can't blame the Packers either.
        It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
          Rodgers has already earned around $250,000,000 in his career. He's not hurting for cash.
          The State Farm checks have to double that.
          Originally posted by 3irty1
          This is museum quality stupidity.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
            A CLIP FROM JS
            The problem is if Rodgers is only willing to restructure if the Packers pay him more. Rodgers talked about the uncertainty of the roster after the Packers lost to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in the NFC championship game and included himself in that picture.
            1) He doesn't have to be willing.
            2) He'd be stupid not to let them turn his roster bonus into a signing bonus. He wouldn't just be doing the team a solid. It would be good for him also. That's guaranteed money now over potential money later.

            $250,000,000 in his career. If this guy is mad at Packers management, he's a bigger douche bag than late career Favre.
            Last edited by HarveyWallbangers; 03-13-2021, 02:37 AM.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
              1) He doesn't have to be willing.
              2) He'd be stupid not to let them turn his roster bonus into a signing bonus. He wouldn't just be doing the team a solid. It would be good for him also. That's guaranteed money now over potential money later.

              $250,000,000 in his career. If this guy is mad at Packers management, he's a bigger douche bag than late career Favre.
              I think, for the most part, money is like power, the more you have, the more you turn into a douche bag and/or the older I get, the more cynical I become..

              Comment


              • #52
                The Packers have a pretty good roster, but it probably won't be as good in 2021. That's the way football works.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                  The Packers have a pretty good roster, but it probably won't be as good in 2021. That's the way football works.
                  I think a lot depends on what they come up with at RT. If they have to move Jenkins there, the interior OL could see a dropoff. But if they can keep Jenkins at LG/C they should be fine there. I think Runyan is real. I think Dillon is a very different type of runner than Aaron Jones, but may be just as productive.
                  I can't run no more
                  With that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places
                  Say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                  A thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                    Rodgers IMO wants the security of being in GB long term. Did I ever say anything about about over 35MIL ? You are probably right; but I think the main thing AROD wants is a longer term committment. He's been reportedly nicer to the Luvmachine than Favre was to him....but I don't think he likes that pick much more than Favre liked him
                    They should have tendered Boyle. Then asked Rodgers to tack on 2 years at $25 million each and convert this season to bonus. In the deal we would agree to trade Love before the draft.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                      They should have tendered Boyle. Then asked Rodgers to tack on 2 years at $25 million each and convert this season to bonus. In the deal we would agree to trade Love before the draft.
                      This is such a good idea. Be like, look man we’ll commit to you. But commit to us back. He would never. But it’s funny to think about putting the ball in his court. It’s like when favre was big timing the packers and contemplating retirement instead of coming to offseason work. Of course he wanted the teams commitment but he didn’t even want to show up for the offseason work so the commitment back was optional. A great GM will find a great QB. Period. Everyone is replaceable. No one should be big timing their teammates.
                      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                        The Packers have a pretty good roster, but it probably won't be as good in 2021. That's the way football works.
                        No, that's not automatic. If the team isn't as good, it means the GM isn't doing a good job. Are there gonna be a lot of high priced players sitting at home on Sundays this season because the salary cap went down? Hell no. Smart GMs will figure out a way to make it work. As I have said, as Harvey has said - in great detail, it should be easily doable to keep anybody and everybody worth keeping. Gutekunst has started the process; He needs to get the big 3 restructures done - Rodgers, Z. Smith, and D. Adams - in order to retain Aaron Jones and he should be able to keep Linsley too, although Linsley is probably not gonna make it. It's probably time to ask, WWJD - what would Jerry Jones do?
                        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                          They should have tendered Boyle. Then asked Rodgers to tack on 2 years at $25 million each and convert this season to bonus. In the deal we would agree to trade Love before the draft.
                          As great as that sounds, for some odd reason, cutting Love and I presume trading him too would mean a $7 million cap hit or something like that.
                          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                            They should have tendered Boyle. Then asked Rodgers to tack on 2 years at $25 million each and convert this season to bonus. In the deal we would agree to trade Love before the draft.

                            I could see Rodgers being OK with that. Maybe you even throw him 30MIL a year instead of 25

                            But anybody think Gute would ponder this ?
                            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Or he plays out his contract. We don't need him to restructure.

                              We need adams to restructure. We need to keep him at least 3 more years. Preferably 4
                              All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                              George Orwell

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
                                Or he plays out his contract. We don't need him to restructure.

                                We need adams to restructure. We need to keep him at least 3 more years. Preferably 4
                                I kind of agree with this. Let 12 play out the deal and see where love is at.
                                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X