OFFICIAL BRETT THE LIVING LEGEND THREAD

[Merlin]

Funny what amuses some people. ie Where and what Brett Favre is doing or up to.

Or which color jersey he is heaving it up to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smhiIIekc8g&feature=player_embedded

I can't imagine how he could possibly top the colossal choke job that ended their season last year, but I'd love to watch him try.

Choke Job? I would say the "choke" were the fumbles and the poor game management that caused them to have too many in the huddle to begin with. The interception was a poor decision but it wasn't what cost them the game by a long shot which to me is the definition of "choke".

If it weren't for a Rodgers interception and fumble, the Cardinals don't score the first, and last points of the game - and according to your logic that isn't a choke job? Forget the fact the defense couldn't stop anything.

[Packerarcher]

Merlin,you have to remember that SC only sees things the way he wants to. He will be anti Brett no matter what,don't let his post's get you worked up. He is deffinately not worth it.

[Scott Campbell]

Merlin,you have to remember that SC only sees things the way he wants to.

And that clip was exactly the way I wanted to see it.

Thanks Bert!

[Scott Campbell]

This is not Detroit man, this is the Superbowl!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNP7oPzXmMY

[Scott Campbell]

With hilarious fan reactions:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoJ_K4Mlt4w

His HOF induction will be a lot more tolerable with this clip playing over, and over, and over.

[hoosier]

This one is amusing: "Thanks for renting Brett Favre to us. You can have him!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjlbP8PCX-o&feature=related

[Scott Campbell]

He will be anti Brett no matter what.......

And what did you think of his last throw? Pretty good stuff - huh? The ole gunslinger!

[ThunderDan]

Merlin,you have to remember that SC only sees things the way he wants to. He will be anti Brett no matter what,don't let his post's get you worked up. He is deffinately not worth it.

Considering that BF is the QB of our most hated rival (at this point in time) Minnesota Vikings, I would hope that all self-respecting Packer fans would be anti-BF at this moment.

[MJZiggy]

Merlin,you have to remember that SC only sees things the way he wants to. He will be anti Brett no matter what,don't let his post's get you worked up. He is deffinately not worth it.

Considering that BF is the QB of our most hated rival (at this point in time) Minnesota Vikings, I would hope that all self-respecting Packer fans would be anti-BF at this moment.

He might be--or he might not. Or he might. But that's not our problem...

[channtheman]

Funny what amuses some people. ie Where and what Brett Favre is doing or up to.

Or which color jersey he is heaving it up to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smhiIIekc8g&feature=player_embedded

I can't imagine how he could possibly top the colossal choke job that ended their season last year, but I'd love to watch him try.

Choke Job? I would say the "choke" were the fumbles and the poor game management that caused them to have too many in the huddle to begin with. The interception was a poor decision but it wasn't what cost them the game by a long shot which to me is the definition of "choke".

If it weren't for a Rodgers interception and fumble, the Cardinals don't score the first, and last points of the game - and according to your logic that isn't a choke job? Forget the fact the defense couldn't stop anything.

I was wondering who would "bite" first!

[channtheman]

Now that Taylor's gone, who is Brent campaigning for the Vikes to sign?

PS - It's Oscar night. Heard that Brent has been nominated for Best Actor! He acts retired...then bam!

How bad did Favre want Taylor back? I really don't want to see Favre go crying back to Greta and talk about how he should have GM duties for the Vikings... actually, yeah I do wan to see that.

[Scott Campbell]

I was wondering who would "bite" first!

Watching those clips seems to take the wind right out of their sails.

[Joemailman]

Word is Favre was trying to convince LT to sign with Minnesota. http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/The...ruit-tomlinson

Funny he would do that if he hasn't decided if he's coming back. Just in case, I guess.

[Scott Campbell]

Word is Favre was trying to convince LT to sign with Minnesota. http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/The...ruit-tomlinson

Funny he would do that if he hasn't decided if he's coming back. Just in case, I guess.

Or maybe that $250K he screwed Tannenbaum and the Jets out of wasn't enough vengeance for him.

[packerbacker1234]

This is not Detroit man, this is the Superbowl!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNP7oPzXmMY

Of course, that comment came after the question of why the vikings were even throwing the ball to begin with - meaning the comment was directed at the coaching decision, not Favre. The earlier comment of why favre didn't run with it was directed at #4, that comment was directed at the coaching staff.

The choke job really fell on the coaches. They were within the kickers wheelhouse and they get a 12 man in the huddle penalty? Then on the next play when they are just barely outside his range where it is indeed worth taking a FG shot still, they decide to throw it where a beat up favre that can barely move at this point is could either A. Be sacked, B. Throw a pick, C. Throw it away and be teh same as if you were before. The correct coaching call would of been a run, and I think the reason they avoided it was the 4 fumbles.

Coaches choked. Say favre throws the ball away: Chances are the FG is missed anyways. Longwell said it was out of his range. Coaches choked, not favre. Favre was just trying to make something happen because his team, according to the kicker, was out of range.

WHY WERE THEY OUT OF RANGE? Oh yeah, the coaches. Nevermind the 4 fumbles that took points off the board.