Originally posted by beveaux1
View Post
Beveaux's two posts on this topic make the most sense to me; his sentiments are echoed by others in this thread. I don't know if I'll have the time or make the time to look it up, but I'd like to see what percentage of Rodgers's throws are over the middle versus toward the sidelines, and also see what depth he most frequently throws to. If in fact Rodgers is loathe to throw short or middling deep over the middle, he's made opposing D coordinators' jobs easier. You still have to have people cover the middle, but you can use more of your resources to cover the sideline areas.
What we have to remember, too, is that Rodgers, like other NFL superstar QB's, has been told for most of his pro career how wonderful he was. Hell, even when he was a junior college QB, he was still considered the best athlete ever coming out of Chico, CA. Then he becomes an All Pro QB, and he's told, over and over and over, that he can do no wrong. Think about it: he got all affronted over being drafted 25th or whatever it was in the first round. As one commentator once said, every NFL athlete is very likely the best athlete in the history of whatever little city or town he came out of. Ever. So when players like Rodgers get to a certain level, they become gods. And gods are never wrong. So no wonder Rodgers would balk at being told he's got to do things differently than he does. He's been encouraged to value his skills, his football IQ, and his opinions regarding running an offense.
Detroit fans often complain that Matt Stafford doesn't stand up enough and demand enough from the Lions' organization. They want him to stand up in the meeting room and call out the coach, tell him the plan won't work, have his guys' backs. But Matt Stafford is not an "A" type personality. He's just not. The down side is that he's not demanding, but the downside of that type of player - like Rodgers - is that they are stubborn and won't accept the idea they might need to change.


Comment