If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Never with Rodgers. That was during the Favre years. Early in Rodgers career as a starter, one of the writers did an interview with MM and asked what changed going from Favre to Rodgers as his starting QB. At that time he said the basics of the offense had not changed, but as a play caller he had to be mindful of what throws his QBs preferred and were best at. The example he gave was that Favre's favorite was slants, and he was very good at it. He said Rodgers much preferred and was best at outside, sideline throws. MM said his play calling changed to reflect that different QBs are better at different throws.
I have thought about that comment ever since, and have mentioned it here and in conversations when fans ask what happened to the slant. Basically, Rodgers didn't like throwing it.
Was there ever a better WR than Nelson with those sideline catches? He had amazing body control and was a perfect fit for Rodgers. Driver and Jennings were also very good on the borders as well. This would definately explain why Finley didn't thrive here like he should have. He was a middle of the field threat, but not so much on the sideline. Rodgers just couldn't (or wouldn't) get him the ball where he was best at.
He can be elite again but he needs talent at WR that can do what he needs. It’s no longer vice versa. Good point on Finley though they sent a lot of balls his way both pre and post injury. Finley was another guy that rarely won contested balls.
The best illustration in this game was Marcedes catch on a flat route that seemed like it was going for a first. He had a blocker in front but got stopped cold anyway. Never got up a head of steam.
Should have been a first. If they had more of that, offense looks a lot different.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
I mean, I think it's safe to say that the passing game is not near what it has been in the past. But, of all the parts of the passing game that you might address/fix, QB is probably at the bottom of the list.
I mean, I think it's safe to say that the passing game is not near what it has been in the past. But, of all the parts of the passing game that you might address/fix, QB is probably at the bottom of the list.
If he could adapt, he would make the shitty receivers better.
It's weird with Aaron. By my count he's had a couple great games, couple good, and the rest mediocre-bad by his standards. Yet it seems impossible to imagine any other starting QBs in the NFL being 11-3 with this squad. If GB had an "average" guy, like some metrics show Rodgers to be I see 3-5 wins. Say Rivers, Stafford, Carr, Allen(s), etc. Maybe I'm delusional but that's how it feels.
It's weird with Aaron. By my count he's had a couple great games, couple good, and the rest mediocre-bad by his standards. Yet it seems impossible to imagine any other starting QBs in the NFL being 11-3 with this squad. If GB had an "average" guy, like some metrics show Rodgers to be I see 3-5 wins. Say Rivers, Stafford, Carr, Allen(s), etc. Maybe I'm delusional but that's how it feels.
I don't agree. Dude has become a prima donna. Always seems to try to blame other players. We may or may not advance in the playoffs (football is a strange game), but I STRONGLY recommend they start looking at Rodgers replacement.
I don't agree. Dude has become a prima donna. Always seems to try to blame other players. We may or may not advance in the playoffs (football is a strange game), but I STRONGLY recommend they start looking at Rodgers replacement.
Did you see him giving Tonyan an earful when he threw it at his feet instead of running it himself upfield 5 yards for a 1st down?
Comment